Chongshan Gu, Yingjian He, Nan Zhang, Yiqiang Liu, Jinfeng Li, Tianfeng Wang, Tie Fan, Zhaoqing Fan, Tao Ouyang
{"title":"绝经前激素反应性和her2阴性淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者新辅助内分泌治疗与新辅助化疗的非逊色随机试验。","authors":"Chongshan Gu, Yingjian He, Nan Zhang, Yiqiang Liu, Jinfeng Li, Tianfeng Wang, Tie Fan, Zhaoqing Fan, Tao Ouyang","doi":"10.1177/10732748251339958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesNeoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) has demonstrated efficacy in postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive and HER2-negative breast cancer. However, few data are available on NET in premenopausal women. This trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) with NET in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized study, premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer were recruited. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either NCT or NET with goserelin and tamoxifen, followed by goserelin and anastrozole. The primary purpose was to evaluate the non-inferiority of NET to NCT using a clinical response rate assessed by ultrasound.ResultsA total of 68 patients were assigned to receive either NCT (n = 31) or NET (n = 37). The clinical response rate was 16.1% for NCT and 35.1% for NET (estimated difference 19.0%, 95%CI: -1.1%-39.1%, non-inferior <i>P</i> = 0.002). The rates of breast-conserving surgery were not significantly different between the NCT and NET groups (90.3% vs 83.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.494).ConclusionsA 35.1% clinical response rate was observed in premenopausal patients after NET. However, this study was underpowered to conclude the non-inferiority of NET to NCT because of its early closure.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02535221.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251339958"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Non-Inferior Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone-Responsive and HER2-Negative Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Chongshan Gu, Yingjian He, Nan Zhang, Yiqiang Liu, Jinfeng Li, Tianfeng Wang, Tie Fan, Zhaoqing Fan, Tao Ouyang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10732748251339958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesNeoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) has demonstrated efficacy in postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive and HER2-negative breast cancer. However, few data are available on NET in premenopausal women. This trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) with NET in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized study, premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer were recruited. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either NCT or NET with goserelin and tamoxifen, followed by goserelin and anastrozole. The primary purpose was to evaluate the non-inferiority of NET to NCT using a clinical response rate assessed by ultrasound.ResultsA total of 68 patients were assigned to receive either NCT (n = 31) or NET (n = 37). The clinical response rate was 16.1% for NCT and 35.1% for NET (estimated difference 19.0%, 95%CI: -1.1%-39.1%, non-inferior <i>P</i> = 0.002). The rates of breast-conserving surgery were not significantly different between the NCT and NET groups (90.3% vs 83.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.494).ConclusionsA 35.1% clinical response rate was observed in premenopausal patients after NET. However, this study was underpowered to conclude the non-inferiority of NET to NCT because of its early closure.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02535221.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Control\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"10732748251339958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062642/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251339958\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251339958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的新辅助内分泌治疗(NET)对绝经后激素反应性和her2阴性乳腺癌患者的疗效已被证实。然而,很少有关于绝经前妇女NET的数据。该试验旨在比较新辅助化疗(NCT)和NET对激素反应性、her2阴性和淋巴结阴性乳腺癌绝经前患者的疗效。方法在这项前瞻性、随机研究中,招募了绝经前激素反应性、her2阴性和淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者。纳入的患者被随机分配(1:1)接受NCT或NET联合戈舍雷林和他莫昔芬,然后是戈舍雷林和阿那曲唑。主要目的是通过超声评估临床反应率来评估NET对NCT的非劣效性。结果共68例患者被分为NCT组(n = 31)和NET组(n = 37)。NCT的临床缓解率为16.1%,NET为35.1%(估计差异为19.0%,95%CI: -1.1%-39.1%,非劣效P = 0.002)。NCT组和NET组保乳手术率差异无统计学意义(90.3% vs 83.8%, P = 0.494)。结论绝经前患者经NET治疗后的临床有效率为35.1%。然而,由于早期关闭,本研究不足以得出NET对NCT的非劣效性结论。临床试验注册:clinicaltrials .gov NCT02535221。
A Non-Inferior Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone-Responsive and HER2-Negative Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer.
ObjectivesNeoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) has demonstrated efficacy in postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive and HER2-negative breast cancer. However, few data are available on NET in premenopausal women. This trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) with NET in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer.MethodsIn this prospective, randomized study, premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative breast cancer were recruited. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either NCT or NET with goserelin and tamoxifen, followed by goserelin and anastrozole. The primary purpose was to evaluate the non-inferiority of NET to NCT using a clinical response rate assessed by ultrasound.ResultsA total of 68 patients were assigned to receive either NCT (n = 31) or NET (n = 37). The clinical response rate was 16.1% for NCT and 35.1% for NET (estimated difference 19.0%, 95%CI: -1.1%-39.1%, non-inferior P = 0.002). The rates of breast-conserving surgery were not significantly different between the NCT and NET groups (90.3% vs 83.8%, P = 0.494).ConclusionsA 35.1% clinical response rate was observed in premenopausal patients after NET. However, this study was underpowered to conclude the non-inferiority of NET to NCT because of its early closure.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02535221.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.