中国和美国奥拉帕尼辅助靶向治疗BRCA突变her2阴性早期乳腺癌的成本-效用分析

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Chenxia Xu, Jie Zhuang, Jianrong Shen, Hong Sun, Jiaqin Cai, Xiaoxia Wei
{"title":"中国和美国奥拉帕尼辅助靶向治疗BRCA突变her2阴性早期乳腺癌的成本-效用分析","authors":"Chenxia Xu, Jie Zhuang, Jianrong Shen, Hong Sun, Jiaqin Cai, Xiaoxia Wei","doi":"10.1186/s12962-025-00617-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olaparib, an inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), has demonstrated promising outcomes in treating HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer with BRCA mutations. However, a comprehensive evaluation of its cost-effectiveness in the context of the United States and China has yet to be undertaken. This study seeks to fill this research void by performing a thorough cost-utility analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigation takes as its foundation the findings from the OlympiA trial. We obtained survival curves from this trial and used the Weibull distribution function to calculate transition probabilities. Relevant literature provided the necessary data on costs, utility values, and discount rates applicable to both the United States and China. We utilized TreeAge software to construct Markov models for each country, simulating the progression of early-stage breast cancer. These models underwent extensive examination through multi-way analysis, cost-utility analysis, Monte Carlo simulations, one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses, as well as probabilistic sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cost-utility analysis of the Chinese Markov model revealed that the total expenditure for the Olaparib cohort amounted to 384,274.75 RMB, generating 6.41 QALYs. Conversely, the placebo group incurred a total cost of 60,264.10 RMB, resulting in 6.34 QALYs. The Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) between the two cohorts stood at 5,007,332.36 RMB/QALY, which is significantly higher than thrice the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of China in 2022, set at 257,094 RMB. As for the U.S. model, the Olaparib group had a total expenditure of 245,604.01 USD, yielding 7.53 QALYs, while the placebo cohort had a total cost of 93,019.92 USD, generating 7.45 QALYs. The ICUR for the two groups was calculated at 1,891,974.19 USD/QALY, substantially surpassing the U.S. Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) threshold of 150,000 USD/QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When evaluated in the context of healthcare economics in both China and the United States, the implementation of an Olaparib-based treatment strategy for early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer with BRCA mutations does not present a cost-effective solution in either nation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"23 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-utility analysis of olaparib assisted targeted therapy for BRCA mutation HER2-negative early breast cancer in China and in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Chenxia Xu, Jie Zhuang, Jianrong Shen, Hong Sun, Jiaqin Cai, Xiaoxia Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12962-025-00617-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olaparib, an inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), has demonstrated promising outcomes in treating HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer with BRCA mutations. However, a comprehensive evaluation of its cost-effectiveness in the context of the United States and China has yet to be undertaken. This study seeks to fill this research void by performing a thorough cost-utility analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigation takes as its foundation the findings from the OlympiA trial. We obtained survival curves from this trial and used the Weibull distribution function to calculate transition probabilities. Relevant literature provided the necessary data on costs, utility values, and discount rates applicable to both the United States and China. We utilized TreeAge software to construct Markov models for each country, simulating the progression of early-stage breast cancer. These models underwent extensive examination through multi-way analysis, cost-utility analysis, Monte Carlo simulations, one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses, as well as probabilistic sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cost-utility analysis of the Chinese Markov model revealed that the total expenditure for the Olaparib cohort amounted to 384,274.75 RMB, generating 6.41 QALYs. Conversely, the placebo group incurred a total cost of 60,264.10 RMB, resulting in 6.34 QALYs. The Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) between the two cohorts stood at 5,007,332.36 RMB/QALY, which is significantly higher than thrice the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of China in 2022, set at 257,094 RMB. As for the U.S. model, the Olaparib group had a total expenditure of 245,604.01 USD, yielding 7.53 QALYs, while the placebo cohort had a total cost of 93,019.92 USD, generating 7.45 QALYs. The ICUR for the two groups was calculated at 1,891,974.19 USD/QALY, substantially surpassing the U.S. Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) threshold of 150,000 USD/QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When evaluated in the context of healthcare economics in both China and the United States, the implementation of an Olaparib-based treatment strategy for early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer with BRCA mutations does not present a cost-effective solution in either nation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993938/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00617-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00617-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:奥拉帕尼(Olaparib)是一种聚(adp -核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂,在治疗伴有BRCA突变的her2阴性早期乳腺癌方面显示出良好的效果。然而,在美国和中国的背景下,对其成本效益的全面评估尚未进行。本研究试图通过进行彻底的成本效用分析来填补这一研究空白。方法:本研究以奥林匹亚试验结果为基础。我们从该试验中获得生存曲线,并使用威布尔分布函数计算转移概率。相关文献提供了适用于美国和中国的成本、效用值和贴现率的必要数据。我们利用TreeAge软件构建各国的马尔可夫模型,模拟早期乳腺癌的发展。通过多路分析、成本效用分析、蒙特卡罗模拟、单向和双向敏感性分析以及概率敏感性分析,对这些模型进行了广泛的检验。结果:中国马尔可夫模型的成本效用分析显示,奥拉帕尼队列的总支出为384274.75元人民币,产生6.41个qaly。相反,安慰剂组的总成本为60264.10元,qaly为6.34次。两组的增量成本效用比(ICUR)为5007332.36元/QALY,显著高于中国2022年人均国内生产总值(GDP) 257094元的三倍。在美国模型中,奥拉帕尼组总费用为245,604.01美元,产生7.53个QALYs,而安慰剂组总费用为93,019.92美元,产生7.45个QALYs。两组的ICUR计算为1,891,974.19美元/QALY,大大超过了美国的支付意愿(WTP)阈值150,000美元/QALY。结论:在中国和美国的医疗经济学背景下进行评估时,在两国实施基于奥拉帕尼的BRCA突变早期her2阴性乳腺癌治疗策略都不具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-utility analysis of olaparib assisted targeted therapy for BRCA mutation HER2-negative early breast cancer in China and in the United States.

Background: Olaparib, an inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), has demonstrated promising outcomes in treating HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer with BRCA mutations. However, a comprehensive evaluation of its cost-effectiveness in the context of the United States and China has yet to be undertaken. This study seeks to fill this research void by performing a thorough cost-utility analysis.

Methods: This investigation takes as its foundation the findings from the OlympiA trial. We obtained survival curves from this trial and used the Weibull distribution function to calculate transition probabilities. Relevant literature provided the necessary data on costs, utility values, and discount rates applicable to both the United States and China. We utilized TreeAge software to construct Markov models for each country, simulating the progression of early-stage breast cancer. These models underwent extensive examination through multi-way analysis, cost-utility analysis, Monte Carlo simulations, one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses, as well as probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Results: The cost-utility analysis of the Chinese Markov model revealed that the total expenditure for the Olaparib cohort amounted to 384,274.75 RMB, generating 6.41 QALYs. Conversely, the placebo group incurred a total cost of 60,264.10 RMB, resulting in 6.34 QALYs. The Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR) between the two cohorts stood at 5,007,332.36 RMB/QALY, which is significantly higher than thrice the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of China in 2022, set at 257,094 RMB. As for the U.S. model, the Olaparib group had a total expenditure of 245,604.01 USD, yielding 7.53 QALYs, while the placebo cohort had a total cost of 93,019.92 USD, generating 7.45 QALYs. The ICUR for the two groups was calculated at 1,891,974.19 USD/QALY, substantially surpassing the U.S. Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) threshold of 150,000 USD/QALY.

Conclusions: When evaluated in the context of healthcare economics in both China and the United States, the implementation of an Olaparib-based treatment strategy for early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer with BRCA mutations does not present a cost-effective solution in either nation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信