使用Efsitora α胰岛素治疗成人2型糖尿病的新型临床决策支持算法的安全性和功能性:早期可行性研究

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-12 DOI:10.1089/dia.2025.0051
Michelle Katz, Christof Kazda, Jie Xue, Juan Frías, Ronald Brazg, Jit Mitra, Stephanie Gleissner, Eyal Dassau
{"title":"使用Efsitora α胰岛素治疗成人2型糖尿病的新型临床决策支持算法的安全性和功能性:早期可行性研究","authors":"Michelle Katz, Christof Kazda, Jie Xue, Juan Frías, Ronald Brazg, Jit Mitra, Stephanie Gleissner, Eyal Dassau","doi":"10.1089/dia.2025.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> For people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), optimal glycemic control is critical. Digital health interventions are a practical approach to improve T2D self-management. This study explored the safety and functionality of a novel clinical decision-support (CDS) application for individualized dosing of insulin efsitora (efsitora), a once-weekly basal insulin receptor agonist. <b><i>Participants and Methods:</i></b> This was a 16-week, multicenter, open-label early feasibility study in adults with T2D with or without basal insulin. Investigators requested an efsitora dose from the CDS algorithm and either overrode or accepted the recommendation. Dose recommendation overrides (primary endpoint), finger-stick glucose, blinded continuous glucose monitoring metrics, and hypoglycemic events were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Two sequential cohorts consisted of 68 participants; each cohort included insulin-naïve and basal-switch participants. In both cohorts, mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for basal-switch participants ranged from 7.9% to 8.5%. Mean HbA1c for insulin-naïve participants ranged from 8.1% to 8.3%. CDS dosing recommendation overrides occurred for 0.7% of injections for basal-switch participants and for 1.0% of injections for insulin-naïve participants in Cohort 1. For Cohort 2, overrides occurred for 1.3% of injections for insulin-naïve participants, with no overrides for basal-switch participants. HbA1c was significantly reduced <i>(P</i> < 0.05) from baseline to Week 16 in both subgroups for both cohorts. The proportion of participants with fasting blood glucose within the targets increased from baseline to Week 16 in both subgroups for both cohorts. No level 3 hypoglycemia was observed. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The novel CDS algorithm showed promising clinical performance and favorable investigator confidence as determined by a low rate of dose overrides.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"737-746"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Functionality of a Novel Clinical Decision-Support Algorithm with Insulin Efsitora Alfa in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Early Feasibility Study.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Katz, Christof Kazda, Jie Xue, Juan Frías, Ronald Brazg, Jit Mitra, Stephanie Gleissner, Eyal Dassau\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2025.0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> For people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), optimal glycemic control is critical. Digital health interventions are a practical approach to improve T2D self-management. This study explored the safety and functionality of a novel clinical decision-support (CDS) application for individualized dosing of insulin efsitora (efsitora), a once-weekly basal insulin receptor agonist. <b><i>Participants and Methods:</i></b> This was a 16-week, multicenter, open-label early feasibility study in adults with T2D with or without basal insulin. Investigators requested an efsitora dose from the CDS algorithm and either overrode or accepted the recommendation. Dose recommendation overrides (primary endpoint), finger-stick glucose, blinded continuous glucose monitoring metrics, and hypoglycemic events were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Two sequential cohorts consisted of 68 participants; each cohort included insulin-naïve and basal-switch participants. In both cohorts, mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for basal-switch participants ranged from 7.9% to 8.5%. Mean HbA1c for insulin-naïve participants ranged from 8.1% to 8.3%. CDS dosing recommendation overrides occurred for 0.7% of injections for basal-switch participants and for 1.0% of injections for insulin-naïve participants in Cohort 1. For Cohort 2, overrides occurred for 1.3% of injections for insulin-naïve participants, with no overrides for basal-switch participants. HbA1c was significantly reduced <i>(P</i> < 0.05) from baseline to Week 16 in both subgroups for both cohorts. The proportion of participants with fasting blood glucose within the targets increased from baseline to Week 16 in both subgroups for both cohorts. No level 3 hypoglycemia was observed. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The novel CDS algorithm showed promising clinical performance and favorable investigator confidence as determined by a low rate of dose overrides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"737-746\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0051\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于2型糖尿病(T2D)患者来说,最佳的血糖控制是至关重要的。数字卫生干预措施是改善T2D自我管理的一种实用方法。本研究探讨了一种新的临床决策支持(CDS)应用于个体化给药的安全性和功能性,这是每周一次的基础胰岛素受体激动剂。参与者和方法:这是一项为期16周、多中心、开放标签的早期可行性研究,研究对象是有或没有基础胰岛素的成年T2D患者。研究人员要求从CDS算法中获得一个efsitora剂量,并推翻或接受了该建议。评估了剂量推荐优于(主要终点)、指棒血糖、盲法连续血糖监测指标和低血糖事件。结果:两个连续队列包括68名参与者;每个队列包括insulin-naïve和base -switch参与者。在这两个队列中,基线转换参与者的平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)从7.9%到8.5%不等。insulin-naïve参与者的平均HbA1c范围为8.1%至8.3%。在队列1中,基底开关参与者中有0.7%的注射者和insulin-naïve参与者中有1.0%的注射者存在CDS剂量推荐无效。在队列2中,insulin-naïve参与者中有1.3%的注射无效,而基底开关参与者中没有无效。从基线到第16周,两组患者的HbA1c均显著降低(P < 0.05)。在两个队列的两个亚组中,空腹血糖在目标范围内的参与者比例从基线到第16周都有所增加。未见3级低血糖。结论:新的CDS算法具有良好的临床性能和良好的研究者信心,这是由低剂量覆盖率决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Functionality of a Novel Clinical Decision-Support Algorithm with Insulin Efsitora Alfa in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Early Feasibility Study.

Introduction: For people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), optimal glycemic control is critical. Digital health interventions are a practical approach to improve T2D self-management. This study explored the safety and functionality of a novel clinical decision-support (CDS) application for individualized dosing of insulin efsitora (efsitora), a once-weekly basal insulin receptor agonist. Participants and Methods: This was a 16-week, multicenter, open-label early feasibility study in adults with T2D with or without basal insulin. Investigators requested an efsitora dose from the CDS algorithm and either overrode or accepted the recommendation. Dose recommendation overrides (primary endpoint), finger-stick glucose, blinded continuous glucose monitoring metrics, and hypoglycemic events were evaluated. Results: Two sequential cohorts consisted of 68 participants; each cohort included insulin-naïve and basal-switch participants. In both cohorts, mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for basal-switch participants ranged from 7.9% to 8.5%. Mean HbA1c for insulin-naïve participants ranged from 8.1% to 8.3%. CDS dosing recommendation overrides occurred for 0.7% of injections for basal-switch participants and for 1.0% of injections for insulin-naïve participants in Cohort 1. For Cohort 2, overrides occurred for 1.3% of injections for insulin-naïve participants, with no overrides for basal-switch participants. HbA1c was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) from baseline to Week 16 in both subgroups for both cohorts. The proportion of participants with fasting blood glucose within the targets increased from baseline to Week 16 in both subgroups for both cohorts. No level 3 hypoglycemia was observed. Conclusions: The novel CDS algorithm showed promising clinical performance and favorable investigator confidence as determined by a low rate of dose overrides.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信