Michael J Mauro, Yosuke Minami, Andreas Hochhaus, Elza Lomaia, Sergey Voloshin, Anna Turkina, Dong-Wook Kim, Jane F Apperley, Jorge Cortes, Andre Abdo, Laura Maria Fogliato, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim, Philipp le Coutre, Susanne Saussele, Mario Annunziata, Timothy P Hughes, Naeem Chaudhri, Lynette Chee, Valentin Garcia-Gutierrez, Koji Sasaki, Carla Boquimpani, Shruti Kapoor, Noemi Espurz-Abad, Vishal Dhamal, Delphine Rea
{"title":"在ASCEMBL患者近4年的随访后,阿西米尼在晚期CML-CP中仍优于博舒替尼。","authors":"Michael J Mauro, Yosuke Minami, Andreas Hochhaus, Elza Lomaia, Sergey Voloshin, Anna Turkina, Dong-Wook Kim, Jane F Apperley, Jorge Cortes, Andre Abdo, Laura Maria Fogliato, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim, Philipp le Coutre, Susanne Saussele, Mario Annunziata, Timothy P Hughes, Naeem Chaudhri, Lynette Chee, Valentin Garcia-Gutierrez, Koji Sasaki, Carla Boquimpani, Shruti Kapoor, Noemi Espurz-Abad, Vishal Dhamal, Delphine Rea","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of and disease control afforded by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) has led to increased longevity and thus continued pursuit of alternative therapies that are efficacious and maximize tolerability. The 24- and 96-week analyses from ASCEMBL demonstrated superior efficacy, safety, and tolerability of asciminib compared with bosutinib in later-line therapy, meeting primary and key secondary objectives, respectively. With nearly 4 years of follow-up, data from ASCEMBL continued to demonstrate superior efficacy, better safety, and greater tolerability of asciminib compared with bosutinib. At week 156, the major molecular response (MMR) rates remained higher with asciminib (33.8%) than bosutinib (10.5%); the difference in MMR rates between arms, after adjusting for baseline major cytogenetic response, was 23.2% (95% CI, 13.14%-33.18%; 2-sided P<0.001). Asciminib continued to cause fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (59.6% vs 68.4%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (8.3% vs 27.6%) than bosutinib. This updated analysis also includes patients who switched to asciminib due to lack of efficacy with bosutinib. Two of 25 patients who switched achieved MMR by the end of study, suggesting that earlier incorporation of asciminib, before other TKIs, may improve responses, albeit modestly. These long-term results further solidify asciminib as the therapy of choice for patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 prior TKIs. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03106779.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asciminib remained superior vs bosutinib in late-line CML-CP after nearly 4 years of follow-up in ASCEMBL.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Mauro, Yosuke Minami, Andreas Hochhaus, Elza Lomaia, Sergey Voloshin, Anna Turkina, Dong-Wook Kim, Jane F Apperley, Jorge Cortes, Andre Abdo, Laura Maria Fogliato, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim, Philipp le Coutre, Susanne Saussele, Mario Annunziata, Timothy P Hughes, Naeem Chaudhri, Lynette Chee, Valentin Garcia-Gutierrez, Koji Sasaki, Carla Boquimpani, Shruti Kapoor, Noemi Espurz-Abad, Vishal Dhamal, Delphine Rea\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The efficacy of and disease control afforded by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) has led to increased longevity and thus continued pursuit of alternative therapies that are efficacious and maximize tolerability. The 24- and 96-week analyses from ASCEMBL demonstrated superior efficacy, safety, and tolerability of asciminib compared with bosutinib in later-line therapy, meeting primary and key secondary objectives, respectively. With nearly 4 years of follow-up, data from ASCEMBL continued to demonstrate superior efficacy, better safety, and greater tolerability of asciminib compared with bosutinib. At week 156, the major molecular response (MMR) rates remained higher with asciminib (33.8%) than bosutinib (10.5%); the difference in MMR rates between arms, after adjusting for baseline major cytogenetic response, was 23.2% (95% CI, 13.14%-33.18%; 2-sided P<0.001). Asciminib continued to cause fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (59.6% vs 68.4%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (8.3% vs 27.6%) than bosutinib. This updated analysis also includes patients who switched to asciminib due to lack of efficacy with bosutinib. Two of 25 patients who switched achieved MMR by the end of study, suggesting that earlier incorporation of asciminib, before other TKIs, may improve responses, albeit modestly. These long-term results further solidify asciminib as the therapy of choice for patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 prior TKIs. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03106779.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016042\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Asciminib remained superior vs bosutinib in late-line CML-CP after nearly 4 years of follow-up in ASCEMBL.
The efficacy of and disease control afforded by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) has led to increased longevity and thus continued pursuit of alternative therapies that are efficacious and maximize tolerability. The 24- and 96-week analyses from ASCEMBL demonstrated superior efficacy, safety, and tolerability of asciminib compared with bosutinib in later-line therapy, meeting primary and key secondary objectives, respectively. With nearly 4 years of follow-up, data from ASCEMBL continued to demonstrate superior efficacy, better safety, and greater tolerability of asciminib compared with bosutinib. At week 156, the major molecular response (MMR) rates remained higher with asciminib (33.8%) than bosutinib (10.5%); the difference in MMR rates between arms, after adjusting for baseline major cytogenetic response, was 23.2% (95% CI, 13.14%-33.18%; 2-sided P<0.001). Asciminib continued to cause fewer grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (59.6% vs 68.4%) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (8.3% vs 27.6%) than bosutinib. This updated analysis also includes patients who switched to asciminib due to lack of efficacy with bosutinib. Two of 25 patients who switched achieved MMR by the end of study, suggesting that earlier incorporation of asciminib, before other TKIs, may improve responses, albeit modestly. These long-term results further solidify asciminib as the therapy of choice for patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 prior TKIs. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03106779.
期刊介绍:
Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016.
Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.