副肿瘤和症状评分(PRIMAL)用于预测肾细胞癌患者手术后的总体和癌症特异性生存。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Giacomo Musso, Margaret F Meagher, Kit L Yuen, Benjamin Baker, Omer Baker, Aaron Ahdoot, Dhruv Puri, Mai Dabbas, Natalie Birouty, Cesare Saitta, Melis Guer, Dattatraya Patil, Hajime Tanaka, Masaki Kobayashi, Shohei Fukuda, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Salonia, Umberto Capitanio, Alessandro Larcher, Yasuhisa Fujii, Viraj Master, Ithaar H Derweesh
{"title":"副肿瘤和症状评分(PRIMAL)用于预测肾细胞癌患者手术后的总体和癌症特异性生存。","authors":"Giacomo Musso, Margaret F Meagher, Kit L Yuen, Benjamin Baker, Omer Baker, Aaron Ahdoot, Dhruv Puri, Mai Dabbas, Natalie Birouty, Cesare Saitta, Melis Guer, Dattatraya Patil, Hajime Tanaka, Masaki Kobayashi, Shohei Fukuda, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Salonia, Umberto Capitanio, Alessandro Larcher, Yasuhisa Fujii, Viraj Master, Ithaar H Derweesh","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop the PRIMAL (Prognostic Risk stratification for Integrating Manifestations of symptoms and Abnormal Labs) score to predict prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by integrating clinical presentation, paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS), and abnormal laboratory values at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>5256 T1-T4, N0/1, M0/1 RCC surgical patients from 4 institutions were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative variables included hematuria, visceral pain, nausea/vomiting, thrombocytopenia (<100 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L), hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL), anemia (<11.5 mg/dL for women, <12.5 mg/dL for men), elevated De Ritis Ratio (AST/ALT > 1.25), elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR > 2.27). Patients were stratified into 4 PRIMAL categories (Low = 0, Favorable-intermediate = 1-2, Unfavorable-intermediate = 1-2+anemia, High ≥ 3). Multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed association with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). C-indexes, Receiver operating characteristic curves and Area under curve assessed accuracy of the model towards OS and CSS individually and in combination with the Leibovich score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2513 (48%) patients had low, 1532 (29%) favorable-intermediate, 909 (17%) unfavorable-intermediate, 302 (6%) high PRIMAL score. High score patients exhibited highest hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality (ACM) (HR = 7.71, 95% CI = 5.98-9.93) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) (HR = 8.54, 95% CI = 5.96-12.24). Five-year OS rates were 91%, 82%, 65% and 46%, while CSS rates were 95%, 90%, 76% and 60% for Low, Favorable-Intermediate, Unfavorable-Intermediate and High groups, respectively. PRIMAL achieved C-indexes of 0.70 for OS and 0.74 for CSS prediction. The combined CSS PRIMAL-Leibovich model yielded an AUC of 0.76 (P = 0.02), outperforming individual scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRIMAL is a valuable tool for RCC prognostication, enabling assessment of disease aggressiveness at diagnosis. Including PRIMAL score during initial evaluations enhances stratification, identifying patients with a higher risk disease and aids clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paraneoplastic and symptomatic score (PRIMAL) for prediction of overall and cancer-specific survival after surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Giacomo Musso, Margaret F Meagher, Kit L Yuen, Benjamin Baker, Omer Baker, Aaron Ahdoot, Dhruv Puri, Mai Dabbas, Natalie Birouty, Cesare Saitta, Melis Guer, Dattatraya Patil, Hajime Tanaka, Masaki Kobayashi, Shohei Fukuda, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Salonia, Umberto Capitanio, Alessandro Larcher, Yasuhisa Fujii, Viraj Master, Ithaar H Derweesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop the PRIMAL (Prognostic Risk stratification for Integrating Manifestations of symptoms and Abnormal Labs) score to predict prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by integrating clinical presentation, paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS), and abnormal laboratory values at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>5256 T1-T4, N0/1, M0/1 RCC surgical patients from 4 institutions were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative variables included hematuria, visceral pain, nausea/vomiting, thrombocytopenia (<100 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L), hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL), anemia (<11.5 mg/dL for women, <12.5 mg/dL for men), elevated De Ritis Ratio (AST/ALT > 1.25), elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR > 2.27). Patients were stratified into 4 PRIMAL categories (Low = 0, Favorable-intermediate = 1-2, Unfavorable-intermediate = 1-2+anemia, High ≥ 3). Multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed association with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). C-indexes, Receiver operating characteristic curves and Area under curve assessed accuracy of the model towards OS and CSS individually and in combination with the Leibovich score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2513 (48%) patients had low, 1532 (29%) favorable-intermediate, 909 (17%) unfavorable-intermediate, 302 (6%) high PRIMAL score. High score patients exhibited highest hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality (ACM) (HR = 7.71, 95% CI = 5.98-9.93) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) (HR = 8.54, 95% CI = 5.96-12.24). Five-year OS rates were 91%, 82%, 65% and 46%, while CSS rates were 95%, 90%, 76% and 60% for Low, Favorable-Intermediate, Unfavorable-Intermediate and High groups, respectively. PRIMAL achieved C-indexes of 0.70 for OS and 0.74 for CSS prediction. The combined CSS PRIMAL-Leibovich model yielded an AUC of 0.76 (P = 0.02), outperforming individual scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRIMAL is a valuable tool for RCC prognostication, enabling assessment of disease aggressiveness at diagnosis. Including PRIMAL score during initial evaluations enhances stratification, identifying patients with a higher risk disease and aids clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过综合临床表现、副肿瘤综合征(PNS)和诊断时的异常实验室值,建立原发性肾细胞癌(RCC)的预后风险分层(PRIMAL)评分,预测预后。材料与方法:回顾性分析4所医院5256例T1-T4, N0/1, M0/1 RCC手术患者。术前变量包括血尿、内脏疼痛、恶心/呕吐、血小板减少(9/L)、低白蛋白血症(1.25)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值升高(NLR bb0 2.27)。将患者分为4个PRIMAL类别(低 = 0,有利-中间 = 1-2,不利-中间 = 1-2+贫血,高≥3)。多变量Cox回归和Kaplan-Meier分析评估了总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)的相关性。c指数、受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积分别评估模型对OS和CSS的准确性,并结合Leibovich评分。结果:2513例(48%)患者PRIMAL评分为低,1532例(29%)为良好-中间,909例(17%)为不良-中间,302例(6%)为高。高评分患者的全因死亡率(ACM) (HR = 7.71,95% CI = 5.98-9.93)和癌症特异性死亡率(CSM) (HR = 8.54,95% CI = 5.96-12.24)的风险比最高。5年OS率分别为91%、82%、65%和46%,而低、中、中、高组5年OS率分别为95%、90%、76%和60%。PRIMAL预测OS的c指数为0.70,预测CSS的c指数为0.74。联合CSS pri马尔-莱博维奇模型的AUC为0.76 (P = 0.02),优于个体得分。结论:PRIMAL是一种有价值的预测RCC的工具,可以在诊断时评估疾病的侵袭性。在初始评估中纳入PRIMAL评分可以加强分层,识别高风险患者并有助于临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paraneoplastic and symptomatic score (PRIMAL) for prediction of overall and cancer-specific survival after surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Purpose: To develop the PRIMAL (Prognostic Risk stratification for Integrating Manifestations of symptoms and Abnormal Labs) score to predict prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by integrating clinical presentation, paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS), and abnormal laboratory values at diagnosis.

Materials and methods: 5256 T1-T4, N0/1, M0/1 RCC surgical patients from 4 institutions were analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative variables included hematuria, visceral pain, nausea/vomiting, thrombocytopenia (<100 × 109/L), hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL), anemia (<11.5 mg/dL for women, <12.5 mg/dL for men), elevated De Ritis Ratio (AST/ALT > 1.25), elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR > 2.27). Patients were stratified into 4 PRIMAL categories (Low = 0, Favorable-intermediate = 1-2, Unfavorable-intermediate = 1-2+anemia, High ≥ 3). Multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed association with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). C-indexes, Receiver operating characteristic curves and Area under curve assessed accuracy of the model towards OS and CSS individually and in combination with the Leibovich score.

Results: 2513 (48%) patients had low, 1532 (29%) favorable-intermediate, 909 (17%) unfavorable-intermediate, 302 (6%) high PRIMAL score. High score patients exhibited highest hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality (ACM) (HR = 7.71, 95% CI = 5.98-9.93) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) (HR = 8.54, 95% CI = 5.96-12.24). Five-year OS rates were 91%, 82%, 65% and 46%, while CSS rates were 95%, 90%, 76% and 60% for Low, Favorable-Intermediate, Unfavorable-Intermediate and High groups, respectively. PRIMAL achieved C-indexes of 0.70 for OS and 0.74 for CSS prediction. The combined CSS PRIMAL-Leibovich model yielded an AUC of 0.76 (P = 0.02), outperforming individual scores.

Conclusion: PRIMAL is a valuable tool for RCC prognostication, enabling assessment of disease aggressiveness at diagnosis. Including PRIMAL score during initial evaluations enhances stratification, identifying patients with a higher risk disease and aids clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信