关于综合治疗与介入治疗慢性疼痛的争论:远程医疗是否起作用?

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
mHealth Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-24-53
Kush Patel, Leena Mathew, Alopi Patel
{"title":"关于综合治疗与介入治疗慢性疼痛的争论:远程医疗是否起作用?","authors":"Kush Patel, Leena Mathew, Alopi Patel","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The biopsychosocial model of pain acknowledges that pain experiences are shaped by an interplay between biological, psychological, and socio-environmental factors. In clinical practice, two disparate avenues for addressing pain include the widespread interventional paradigm and the rapidly growing holistic model of lifestyle medicine. Traditional pain management often emphasizes pharmacological and invasive approaches. In contrast, lifestyle medicine focuses on optimizing factors such as nutrition, exercise, sleep, stress management, avoidance of toxic substances, and social connectedness to reduce the pain experience. Within the paradigm of lifestyle medicine, specific nutrition plans may help mitigate inflammation, physical activity can alleviate symptoms of chronic pain conditions, and improved sleep can improve pain thresholds. Avoidance of toxic substances like tobacco and illicit drugs, utilization of mind-body stress reduction techniques, and fostering social connections are crucial for enhancing overall well-being and decreasing pain perception. However, there may be some drawbacks to the lifestyle medicine approach. The perception of time investment, the specialized training required for physicians, and the financial aspect can pose significant barriers. Lifestyle medicine is typically more time-intensive, requires more consultation time from physicians and the healthcare team, necessitates stronger adherence from patients, and involves more coaching and follow-up from healthcare providers. The services, treatment, and coaching are often not covered by insurance, which is a financial barrier to providing this kind of care. Despite these challenges, lifestyle medicine offers promising benefits for chronic pain management. Addressing its limitations through telemedicine and integrating it with interventional methods, affords the potential for a comprehensive approach to managing chronic pain in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A debate on integrative <i>vs</i>. interventional approaches to chronic pain: does telemedicine play a role?\",\"authors\":\"Kush Patel, Leena Mathew, Alopi Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/mhealth-24-53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The biopsychosocial model of pain acknowledges that pain experiences are shaped by an interplay between biological, psychological, and socio-environmental factors. In clinical practice, two disparate avenues for addressing pain include the widespread interventional paradigm and the rapidly growing holistic model of lifestyle medicine. Traditional pain management often emphasizes pharmacological and invasive approaches. In contrast, lifestyle medicine focuses on optimizing factors such as nutrition, exercise, sleep, stress management, avoidance of toxic substances, and social connectedness to reduce the pain experience. Within the paradigm of lifestyle medicine, specific nutrition plans may help mitigate inflammation, physical activity can alleviate symptoms of chronic pain conditions, and improved sleep can improve pain thresholds. Avoidance of toxic substances like tobacco and illicit drugs, utilization of mind-body stress reduction techniques, and fostering social connections are crucial for enhancing overall well-being and decreasing pain perception. However, there may be some drawbacks to the lifestyle medicine approach. The perception of time investment, the specialized training required for physicians, and the financial aspect can pose significant barriers. Lifestyle medicine is typically more time-intensive, requires more consultation time from physicians and the healthcare team, necessitates stronger adherence from patients, and involves more coaching and follow-up from healthcare providers. The services, treatment, and coaching are often not covered by insurance, which is a financial barrier to providing this kind of care. Despite these challenges, lifestyle medicine offers promising benefits for chronic pain management. Addressing its limitations through telemedicine and integrating it with interventional methods, affords the potential for a comprehensive approach to managing chronic pain in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"mHealth\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004303/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"mHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-24-53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-24-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疼痛的生物-心理-社会模型承认疼痛体验是由生物、心理和社会环境因素之间的相互作用形成的。在临床实践中,解决疼痛的两种不同途径包括广泛的介入范式和快速增长的生活方式医学的整体模型。传统的疼痛管理通常强调药物和侵入性方法。相反,生活方式医学侧重于优化诸如营养、运动、睡眠、压力管理、避免有毒物质和社会联系等因素,以减少疼痛体验。在生活方式医学的范例中,特定的营养计划可能有助于减轻炎症,体育活动可以减轻慢性疼痛的症状,改善睡眠可以改善疼痛阈值。避免有毒物质,如烟草和非法药物,利用身心减压技术,培养社会联系是提高整体幸福感和减少疼痛感知的关键。然而,生活方式医学方法可能存在一些缺点。对时间投入的认识、医生所需的专业培训以及财务方面都可能构成重大障碍。生活方式医学通常需要更多的时间,需要医生和医疗团队更多的咨询时间,需要患者更强的依从性,并且需要医疗保健提供者提供更多的指导和随访。这些服务、治疗和指导通常不在保险范围内,这是提供此类护理的经济障碍。尽管存在这些挑战,生活方式医学为慢性疼痛管理提供了有希望的好处。通过远程医疗解决其局限性,并将其与介入方法相结合,为未来管理慢性疼痛的综合方法提供了潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A debate on integrative vs. interventional approaches to chronic pain: does telemedicine play a role?

The biopsychosocial model of pain acknowledges that pain experiences are shaped by an interplay between biological, psychological, and socio-environmental factors. In clinical practice, two disparate avenues for addressing pain include the widespread interventional paradigm and the rapidly growing holistic model of lifestyle medicine. Traditional pain management often emphasizes pharmacological and invasive approaches. In contrast, lifestyle medicine focuses on optimizing factors such as nutrition, exercise, sleep, stress management, avoidance of toxic substances, and social connectedness to reduce the pain experience. Within the paradigm of lifestyle medicine, specific nutrition plans may help mitigate inflammation, physical activity can alleviate symptoms of chronic pain conditions, and improved sleep can improve pain thresholds. Avoidance of toxic substances like tobacco and illicit drugs, utilization of mind-body stress reduction techniques, and fostering social connections are crucial for enhancing overall well-being and decreasing pain perception. However, there may be some drawbacks to the lifestyle medicine approach. The perception of time investment, the specialized training required for physicians, and the financial aspect can pose significant barriers. Lifestyle medicine is typically more time-intensive, requires more consultation time from physicians and the healthcare team, necessitates stronger adherence from patients, and involves more coaching and follow-up from healthcare providers. The services, treatment, and coaching are often not covered by insurance, which is a financial barrier to providing this kind of care. Despite these challenges, lifestyle medicine offers promising benefits for chronic pain management. Addressing its limitations through telemedicine and integrating it with interventional methods, affords the potential for a comprehensive approach to managing chronic pain in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信