Ryan McAleer, Rachel Stephenson, Melissa McGowan, Brodie Nolan, Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt
{"title":"加拿大区域创伤网络中继发性创伤转移的分析:改进的空间?","authors":"Ryan McAleer, Rachel Stephenson, Melissa McGowan, Brodie Nolan, Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00900-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines secondary trauma transfers of critically injured patients to an adult regional trauma centre in a mixed urban-suburban setting, to examine if these could be avoided through the provision of prehospital critical care at the scene of injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cohort study of trauma activations at an adult regional trauma centre in Toronto, Canada, over a 5-year period. We included all secondary trauma transfers of patients who were either admitted to the ICU, had surgery within 4 h of arrival or died within 48 h of admission. Baseline demographics, injury data, geospatial data and interventions provided were extracted from the hospital's trauma registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>659 cases met the inclusion criteria during the five-year study period. 364 (55%) patients underwent secondary transfer from non-trauma centres located in relatively close proximity of 80 km or less. Within this group, patients had a median injury severity score of 22 (IQR 16-29) and the mortality was 17%. 188 (52%) received at least one critical care intervention at the sending facility prior to secondary transfer to the trauma centre. The most frequently performed interventions were emergency anesthesia and intubation (37%), blood transfusion (27%), and finger and/or tube thoracostomy (13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant proportion of critically injured patients in our mixed urban-suburban trauma network are transferred from non-trauma hospitals in relatively close proximity to the trauma centre. Non-trauma hospitals frequently provide time-critical and life-saving interventions prior to secondary transfer. A prehospital critical care scene response for major trauma should be explored as an option to deliver critical care interventions at the scene, followed by direct transport to a trauma centre.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of secondary trauma transfers within a Canadian regional trauma network: room for improvement?\",\"authors\":\"Ryan McAleer, Rachel Stephenson, Melissa McGowan, Brodie Nolan, Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-025-00900-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines secondary trauma transfers of critically injured patients to an adult regional trauma centre in a mixed urban-suburban setting, to examine if these could be avoided through the provision of prehospital critical care at the scene of injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cohort study of trauma activations at an adult regional trauma centre in Toronto, Canada, over a 5-year period. We included all secondary trauma transfers of patients who were either admitted to the ICU, had surgery within 4 h of arrival or died within 48 h of admission. Baseline demographics, injury data, geospatial data and interventions provided were extracted from the hospital's trauma registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>659 cases met the inclusion criteria during the five-year study period. 364 (55%) patients underwent secondary transfer from non-trauma centres located in relatively close proximity of 80 km or less. Within this group, patients had a median injury severity score of 22 (IQR 16-29) and the mortality was 17%. 188 (52%) received at least one critical care intervention at the sending facility prior to secondary transfer to the trauma centre. The most frequently performed interventions were emergency anesthesia and intubation (37%), blood transfusion (27%), and finger and/or tube thoracostomy (13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant proportion of critically injured patients in our mixed urban-suburban trauma network are transferred from non-trauma hospitals in relatively close proximity to the trauma centre. Non-trauma hospitals frequently provide time-critical and life-saving interventions prior to secondary transfer. A prehospital critical care scene response for major trauma should be explored as an option to deliver critical care interventions at the scene, followed by direct transport to a trauma centre.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00900-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00900-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of secondary trauma transfers within a Canadian regional trauma network: room for improvement?
Purpose: This study examines secondary trauma transfers of critically injured patients to an adult regional trauma centre in a mixed urban-suburban setting, to examine if these could be avoided through the provision of prehospital critical care at the scene of injury.
Methods: This is a cohort study of trauma activations at an adult regional trauma centre in Toronto, Canada, over a 5-year period. We included all secondary trauma transfers of patients who were either admitted to the ICU, had surgery within 4 h of arrival or died within 48 h of admission. Baseline demographics, injury data, geospatial data and interventions provided were extracted from the hospital's trauma registry.
Results: 659 cases met the inclusion criteria during the five-year study period. 364 (55%) patients underwent secondary transfer from non-trauma centres located in relatively close proximity of 80 km or less. Within this group, patients had a median injury severity score of 22 (IQR 16-29) and the mortality was 17%. 188 (52%) received at least one critical care intervention at the sending facility prior to secondary transfer to the trauma centre. The most frequently performed interventions were emergency anesthesia and intubation (37%), blood transfusion (27%), and finger and/or tube thoracostomy (13%).
Conclusion: A significant proportion of critically injured patients in our mixed urban-suburban trauma network are transferred from non-trauma hospitals in relatively close proximity to the trauma centre. Non-trauma hospitals frequently provide time-critical and life-saving interventions prior to secondary transfer. A prehospital critical care scene response for major trauma should be explored as an option to deliver critical care interventions at the scene, followed by direct transport to a trauma centre.