加拿大区域创伤网络中继发性创伤转移的分析:改进的空间?

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00900-x
Ryan McAleer, Rachel Stephenson, Melissa McGowan, Brodie Nolan, Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt
{"title":"加拿大区域创伤网络中继发性创伤转移的分析:改进的空间?","authors":"Ryan McAleer, Rachel Stephenson, Melissa McGowan, Brodie Nolan, Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00900-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines secondary trauma transfers of critically injured patients to an adult regional trauma centre in a mixed urban-suburban setting, to examine if these could be avoided through the provision of prehospital critical care at the scene of injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cohort study of trauma activations at an adult regional trauma centre in Toronto, Canada, over a 5-year period. We included all secondary trauma transfers of patients who were either admitted to the ICU, had surgery within 4 h of arrival or died within 48 h of admission. Baseline demographics, injury data, geospatial data and interventions provided were extracted from the hospital's trauma registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>659 cases met the inclusion criteria during the five-year study period. 364 (55%) patients underwent secondary transfer from non-trauma centres located in relatively close proximity of 80 km or less. Within this group, patients had a median injury severity score of 22 (IQR 16-29) and the mortality was 17%. 188 (52%) received at least one critical care intervention at the sending facility prior to secondary transfer to the trauma centre. The most frequently performed interventions were emergency anesthesia and intubation (37%), blood transfusion (27%), and finger and/or tube thoracostomy (13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant proportion of critically injured patients in our mixed urban-suburban trauma network are transferred from non-trauma hospitals in relatively close proximity to the trauma centre. Non-trauma hospitals frequently provide time-critical and life-saving interventions prior to secondary transfer. A prehospital critical care scene response for major trauma should be explored as an option to deliver critical care interventions at the scene, followed by direct transport to a trauma centre.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of secondary trauma transfers within a Canadian regional trauma network: room for improvement?\",\"authors\":\"Ryan McAleer, Rachel Stephenson, Melissa McGowan, Brodie Nolan, Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-025-00900-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines secondary trauma transfers of critically injured patients to an adult regional trauma centre in a mixed urban-suburban setting, to examine if these could be avoided through the provision of prehospital critical care at the scene of injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cohort study of trauma activations at an adult regional trauma centre in Toronto, Canada, over a 5-year period. We included all secondary trauma transfers of patients who were either admitted to the ICU, had surgery within 4 h of arrival or died within 48 h of admission. Baseline demographics, injury data, geospatial data and interventions provided were extracted from the hospital's trauma registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>659 cases met the inclusion criteria during the five-year study period. 364 (55%) patients underwent secondary transfer from non-trauma centres located in relatively close proximity of 80 km or less. Within this group, patients had a median injury severity score of 22 (IQR 16-29) and the mortality was 17%. 188 (52%) received at least one critical care intervention at the sending facility prior to secondary transfer to the trauma centre. The most frequently performed interventions were emergency anesthesia and intubation (37%), blood transfusion (27%), and finger and/or tube thoracostomy (13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant proportion of critically injured patients in our mixed urban-suburban trauma network are transferred from non-trauma hospitals in relatively close proximity to the trauma centre. Non-trauma hospitals frequently provide time-critical and life-saving interventions prior to secondary transfer. A prehospital critical care scene response for major trauma should be explored as an option to deliver critical care interventions at the scene, followed by direct transport to a trauma centre.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00900-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00900-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察了在城市-郊区混合环境中,重伤患者向成人区域创伤中心的继发性创伤转移,以检查是否可以通过在损伤现场提供院前重症监护来避免这些转移。方法:这是一项在加拿大多伦多成人区域创伤中心进行的为期5年的创伤激活队列研究。我们纳入了所有继发性创伤转移的患者,这些患者要么住进ICU,在到达后4小时内进行手术,要么在入院后48小时内死亡。基线人口统计数据、伤害数据、地理空间数据和提供的干预措施均来自医院的创伤登记。结果:在5年的研究期间,659例符合纳入标准。364例(55%)患者从距离相对较近的80公里或更短的非创伤中心进行了二次转移。在该组中,患者的中位损伤严重程度评分为22 (IQR 16-29),死亡率为17%。188例(52%)在送往创伤中心之前在送院接受了至少一次重症监护干预。最常见的干预措施是紧急麻醉和插管(37%)、输血(27%)和手指和/或管开胸术(13%)。结论:在我们的城市-郊区混合创伤网络中,有相当大比例的重症患者是从离创伤中心相对较近的非创伤医院转移过来的。非创伤医院经常在二次转院前提供关键时间和挽救生命的干预措施。对于重大创伤,院前重症监护现场反应应作为一种选择,在现场提供重症监护干预,然后直接运送到创伤中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of secondary trauma transfers within a Canadian regional trauma network: room for improvement?

Purpose: This study examines secondary trauma transfers of critically injured patients to an adult regional trauma centre in a mixed urban-suburban setting, to examine if these could be avoided through the provision of prehospital critical care at the scene of injury.

Methods: This is a cohort study of trauma activations at an adult regional trauma centre in Toronto, Canada, over a 5-year period. We included all secondary trauma transfers of patients who were either admitted to the ICU, had surgery within 4 h of arrival or died within 48 h of admission. Baseline demographics, injury data, geospatial data and interventions provided were extracted from the hospital's trauma registry.

Results: 659 cases met the inclusion criteria during the five-year study period. 364 (55%) patients underwent secondary transfer from non-trauma centres located in relatively close proximity of 80 km or less. Within this group, patients had a median injury severity score of 22 (IQR 16-29) and the mortality was 17%. 188 (52%) received at least one critical care intervention at the sending facility prior to secondary transfer to the trauma centre. The most frequently performed interventions were emergency anesthesia and intubation (37%), blood transfusion (27%), and finger and/or tube thoracostomy (13%).

Conclusion: A significant proportion of critically injured patients in our mixed urban-suburban trauma network are transferred from non-trauma hospitals in relatively close proximity to the trauma centre. Non-trauma hospitals frequently provide time-critical and life-saving interventions prior to secondary transfer. A prehospital critical care scene response for major trauma should be explored as an option to deliver critical care interventions at the scene, followed by direct transport to a trauma centre.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信