癌症和非癌症严重疾病住院患者姑息治疗咨询的疾病和种族差异

Emily E Moin, Brian Bayes, Vanessa Madden, Scott D Halpern, Katherine R Courtright
{"title":"癌症和非癌症严重疾病住院患者姑息治疗咨询的疾病和种族差异","authors":"Emily E Moin, Brian Bayes, Vanessa Madden, Scott D Halpern, Katherine R Courtright","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines recommend timely palliative care consultation (PCC) for hospitalized patients with serious illness, but adherence to such guidelines and variability in access are not well described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study from March 21, 2016 to August 8, 2018 during the usual care period of a cluster-randomized trial at 11 hospitals in 8 US states. We included adults age 45 and older with cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, heart failure, or kidney failure. Exposures included diagnoses, demographics, and hospital characteristics, and outcomes included predicted probability and timing of PCC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 40,074 inpatient encounters (median age 72 years [IQR 62-82], 46.9% male, 22.7% Black, 4.6% Hispanic), the most common serious illness was heart failure (66.0%), followed by COPD (39.3%), kidney failure (12.4%), cancer (12.3%), and dementia (11.6%). The overall rate of PCC was 11.6% (95% CI 11.3%-11.9%), ranging across hospitals from 4.2% (95% CI 3.3%-5.3%) to 23.3% (95% CI 19.6%-27.4%). Patients with dementia (20.6%, 95% CI 19.4%-21.7%) and cancer (19.5%, 95% CI 18.5%-20.7%) received PCC the most, and those with kidney failure the least (8.2%, 95% CI 7.5%-9.0%). Median time to PCC after admission was 3 days (IQR 1-6); patients with heart failure, COPD, and kidney failure received PCC 1 day later at the median compared to cancer and dementia. Predictors of increased odds of receiving PCC included being Black or Asian (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.23; aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.31-2.12, respectively) and being admitted to a hospital with a higher overall rate of PCC orders (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCC was underutilized overall and varied substantially in frequency and timing across hospitals, diseases, and patient race. These findings underscore the need to implement standardized approaches to improve adherence to guideline-recommended PCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disease and Race-Based Differences in Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation in Cancer and Noncancer Serious Illnesses.\",\"authors\":\"Emily E Moin, Brian Bayes, Vanessa Madden, Scott D Halpern, Katherine R Courtright\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines recommend timely palliative care consultation (PCC) for hospitalized patients with serious illness, but adherence to such guidelines and variability in access are not well described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study from March 21, 2016 to August 8, 2018 during the usual care period of a cluster-randomized trial at 11 hospitals in 8 US states. We included adults age 45 and older with cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, heart failure, or kidney failure. Exposures included diagnoses, demographics, and hospital characteristics, and outcomes included predicted probability and timing of PCC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 40,074 inpatient encounters (median age 72 years [IQR 62-82], 46.9% male, 22.7% Black, 4.6% Hispanic), the most common serious illness was heart failure (66.0%), followed by COPD (39.3%), kidney failure (12.4%), cancer (12.3%), and dementia (11.6%). The overall rate of PCC was 11.6% (95% CI 11.3%-11.9%), ranging across hospitals from 4.2% (95% CI 3.3%-5.3%) to 23.3% (95% CI 19.6%-27.4%). Patients with dementia (20.6%, 95% CI 19.4%-21.7%) and cancer (19.5%, 95% CI 18.5%-20.7%) received PCC the most, and those with kidney failure the least (8.2%, 95% CI 7.5%-9.0%). Median time to PCC after admission was 3 days (IQR 1-6); patients with heart failure, COPD, and kidney failure received PCC 1 day later at the median compared to cancer and dementia. Predictors of increased odds of receiving PCC included being Black or Asian (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.23; aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.31-2.12, respectively) and being admitted to a hospital with a higher overall rate of PCC orders (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCC was underutilized overall and varied substantially in frequency and timing across hospitals, diseases, and patient race. These findings underscore the need to implement standardized approaches to improve adherence to guideline-recommended PCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:指南建议对患有严重疾病的住院患者及时进行姑息治疗咨询(PCC),但对此类指南的遵守情况和可及性的差异并没有很好的描述。方法:前瞻性队列研究,于2016年3月21日至2018年8月8日在美国8个州11家医院的常规护理期间进行集群随机试验。我们纳入了45岁及以上患有癌症、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、痴呆、心力衰竭或肾衰竭的成年人。暴露包括诊断、人口统计学和医院特征,结果包括预测PCC的概率和时间。结果:在40,074例住院患者(中位年龄72岁[IQR 62-82],男性46.9%,黑人22.7%,西班牙裔4.6%)中,最常见的严重疾病是心力衰竭(66.0%),其次是COPD(39.3%)、肾衰竭(12.4%)、癌症(12.3%)和痴呆(11.6%)。PCC的总体发生率为11.6% (95% CI 11.3%-11.9%),各医院的PCC发生率从4.2% (95% CI 3.3%-5.3%)到23.3% (95% CI 19.6%-27.4%)不等。痴呆患者(20.6%,95% CI 19.4%-21.7%)和癌症患者(19.5%,95% CI 18.5%-20.7%)接受PCC最多,肾衰竭患者最少(8.2%,95% CI 7.5%-9.0%)。入院后至PCC的中位时间为3天(IQR 1-6);与癌症和痴呆患者相比,心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺病和肾衰竭患者接受PCC的中位数晚1天。预测接受PCC几率增加的因素包括黑人或亚洲人(aOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.23;aOR为1.67,95% CI分别为1.31-2.12),而入住PCC总诊断率较高的医院(aOR为1.11,95% CI为1.08-1.13)。结论:PCC总体上未得到充分利用,并且在医院、疾病和患者种族的频率和时间上存在很大差异。这些发现强调了实施标准化方法以提高指南推荐的PCC依从性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disease and Race-Based Differences in Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation in Cancer and Noncancer Serious Illnesses.

Background: Guidelines recommend timely palliative care consultation (PCC) for hospitalized patients with serious illness, but adherence to such guidelines and variability in access are not well described.

Methods: Prospective cohort study from March 21, 2016 to August 8, 2018 during the usual care period of a cluster-randomized trial at 11 hospitals in 8 US states. We included adults age 45 and older with cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, heart failure, or kidney failure. Exposures included diagnoses, demographics, and hospital characteristics, and outcomes included predicted probability and timing of PCC.

Results: Among 40,074 inpatient encounters (median age 72 years [IQR 62-82], 46.9% male, 22.7% Black, 4.6% Hispanic), the most common serious illness was heart failure (66.0%), followed by COPD (39.3%), kidney failure (12.4%), cancer (12.3%), and dementia (11.6%). The overall rate of PCC was 11.6% (95% CI 11.3%-11.9%), ranging across hospitals from 4.2% (95% CI 3.3%-5.3%) to 23.3% (95% CI 19.6%-27.4%). Patients with dementia (20.6%, 95% CI 19.4%-21.7%) and cancer (19.5%, 95% CI 18.5%-20.7%) received PCC the most, and those with kidney failure the least (8.2%, 95% CI 7.5%-9.0%). Median time to PCC after admission was 3 days (IQR 1-6); patients with heart failure, COPD, and kidney failure received PCC 1 day later at the median compared to cancer and dementia. Predictors of increased odds of receiving PCC included being Black or Asian (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.23; aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.31-2.12, respectively) and being admitted to a hospital with a higher overall rate of PCC orders (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.13).

Conclusion: PCC was underutilized overall and varied substantially in frequency and timing across hospitals, diseases, and patient race. These findings underscore the need to implement standardized approaches to improve adherence to guideline-recommended PCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信