围产期心理健康多模式健康干预的随机对照试验

Ellen Goldstein, Mariam Keita, Christabel Koomson, Nathan Tintle, Kirby Adlam, Erin Farah, Mary Dawn Koenig
{"title":"围产期心理健康多模式健康干预的随机对照试验","authors":"Ellen Goldstein, Mariam Keita, Christabel Koomson, Nathan Tintle, Kirby Adlam, Erin Farah, Mary Dawn Koenig","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence has shown that pregnant women who report high rates of psychologic stress are at increased risk for perinatal complications. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a multimodal wellness intervention (MWI) composed of motivational interviewing and mental wellness skills to examine feasibility and acceptability of MWI and to compare changes in subjective measures of psychological and socioemotional outcomes among pregnant women through early postpartum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March 2023 and February 2024, eligible pregnant individuals aged 18 and older, at 10 to 24 weeks' gestation, and English-speaking were recruited from a university-affiliated federally qualified health center (FQHC) in a large metropolitan area. Forty participants were randomized 1:1 to 4 weekly individual (45-60 minutes) virtual sessions of MWI or prenatal education control. Patient-reported perinatal distress and wellness indicators were interview-administered at baseline, postintervention, 2 months postintervention, and 6 weeks postpartum. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05718479).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) age of participants was 27.9 (5.7) years. Most participants identified as Black or African American (70%) pregnant women, with three-quarters being seen for prenatal services at an FQHC. The mean (SD) number of completed intervention sessions was 3.3 (1.3), with 75% of participants completing all 4 sessions. All participants reported being satisfied with the intervention, with 73% who were very satisfied and 86.7% who found the program very useful. MWI versus prenatal education demonstrated medium- to large-sized effects on reducing anxiety from mild to minimal symptoms and resulted in significantly increased health-promoting behaviors (eg, exercise, sleep, nutrition) at follow-up timepoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that MWI was feasible and acceptable, in addition to demonstrating larger reductions in anxiety and greater increases in health-promoting behaviors compared to prenatal education among pregnant women. Further exploration of efficacy outcomes would require a larger sample size to detect more precise effects of MWI on psychological and socioemotional functioning during the perinatal period.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multimodal Wellness Intervention for Perinatal Mental Health.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Goldstein, Mariam Keita, Christabel Koomson, Nathan Tintle, Kirby Adlam, Erin Farah, Mary Dawn Koenig\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.13754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence has shown that pregnant women who report high rates of psychologic stress are at increased risk for perinatal complications. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a multimodal wellness intervention (MWI) composed of motivational interviewing and mental wellness skills to examine feasibility and acceptability of MWI and to compare changes in subjective measures of psychological and socioemotional outcomes among pregnant women through early postpartum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March 2023 and February 2024, eligible pregnant individuals aged 18 and older, at 10 to 24 weeks' gestation, and English-speaking were recruited from a university-affiliated federally qualified health center (FQHC) in a large metropolitan area. Forty participants were randomized 1:1 to 4 weekly individual (45-60 minutes) virtual sessions of MWI or prenatal education control. Patient-reported perinatal distress and wellness indicators were interview-administered at baseline, postintervention, 2 months postintervention, and 6 weeks postpartum. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05718479).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) age of participants was 27.9 (5.7) years. Most participants identified as Black or African American (70%) pregnant women, with three-quarters being seen for prenatal services at an FQHC. The mean (SD) number of completed intervention sessions was 3.3 (1.3), with 75% of participants completing all 4 sessions. All participants reported being satisfied with the intervention, with 73% who were very satisfied and 86.7% who found the program very useful. MWI versus prenatal education demonstrated medium- to large-sized effects on reducing anxiety from mild to minimal symptoms and resulted in significantly increased health-promoting behaviors (eg, exercise, sleep, nutrition) at follow-up timepoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that MWI was feasible and acceptable, in addition to demonstrating larger reductions in anxiety and greater increases in health-promoting behaviors compared to prenatal education among pregnant women. Further exploration of efficacy outcomes would require a larger sample size to detect more precise effects of MWI on psychological and socioemotional functioning during the perinatal period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有证据表明,报告心理应激率高的孕妇发生围产期并发症的风险增加。我们进行了一项由动机性访谈和心理健康技能组成的多模式健康干预(MWI)的试点随机对照试验(RCT),以检验MWI的可行性和可接受性,并比较孕妇在产后早期心理和社会情绪结果的主观测量的变化。方法:在2023年3月至2024年2月期间,在大城市地区的大学附属联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)招募了年龄在18岁及以上、妊娠10至24周、说英语的符合条件的孕妇。40名参与者被随机分为1:1至4周(45-60分钟)的MWI或产前教育控制虚拟会议。在基线、干预后、干预后2个月和产后6周对患者报告的围产期窘迫和健康指标进行访谈。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT05718479)。结果:参与者的平均(SD)年龄为27.9(5.7)岁。大多数参与者被确定为黑人或非裔美国人(70%)孕妇,其中四分之三在FQHC接受产前服务。完成干预疗程的平均(SD)数为3.3(1.3),75%的参与者完成了所有4个疗程。所有参与者都对干预表示满意,73%的人非常满意,86.7%的人认为该计划非常有用。MWI与产前教育相比,在将焦虑从轻微症状减少到轻微症状方面显示出中等到较大的效果,并在随访时间点显著增加了促进健康的行为(如运动、睡眠、营养)。结论:研究结果表明,与产前教育相比,MWI不仅能显著减少孕妇的焦虑,还能显著增加孕妇的健康促进行为,而且是可行和可接受的。进一步探索疗效结果将需要更大的样本量,以检测围产期MWI对心理和社会情绪功能的更精确影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multimodal Wellness Intervention for Perinatal Mental Health.

Introduction: Evidence has shown that pregnant women who report high rates of psychologic stress are at increased risk for perinatal complications. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a multimodal wellness intervention (MWI) composed of motivational interviewing and mental wellness skills to examine feasibility and acceptability of MWI and to compare changes in subjective measures of psychological and socioemotional outcomes among pregnant women through early postpartum.

Methods: Between March 2023 and February 2024, eligible pregnant individuals aged 18 and older, at 10 to 24 weeks' gestation, and English-speaking were recruited from a university-affiliated federally qualified health center (FQHC) in a large metropolitan area. Forty participants were randomized 1:1 to 4 weekly individual (45-60 minutes) virtual sessions of MWI or prenatal education control. Patient-reported perinatal distress and wellness indicators were interview-administered at baseline, postintervention, 2 months postintervention, and 6 weeks postpartum. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05718479).

Results: The mean (SD) age of participants was 27.9 (5.7) years. Most participants identified as Black or African American (70%) pregnant women, with three-quarters being seen for prenatal services at an FQHC. The mean (SD) number of completed intervention sessions was 3.3 (1.3), with 75% of participants completing all 4 sessions. All participants reported being satisfied with the intervention, with 73% who were very satisfied and 86.7% who found the program very useful. MWI versus prenatal education demonstrated medium- to large-sized effects on reducing anxiety from mild to minimal symptoms and resulted in significantly increased health-promoting behaviors (eg, exercise, sleep, nutrition) at follow-up timepoints.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that MWI was feasible and acceptable, in addition to demonstrating larger reductions in anxiety and greater increases in health-promoting behaviors compared to prenatal education among pregnant women. Further exploration of efficacy outcomes would require a larger sample size to detect more precise effects of MWI on psychological and socioemotional functioning during the perinatal period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信