[职业卫生专业人员清单:评估使用信息和通信技术进行在线访谈的适宜性]。

Yusaku Morita, Tetsuro Ishizawa, Koji Kandabashi, Hiroyuki Saito, Sonoko Sakuragi, Natsu Sasaki, Yukiko Sawada, Go Muto, Ayako Murayama, Chiaki Watanabe, Shigeyuki Kajiki
{"title":"[职业卫生专业人员清单:评估使用信息和通信技术进行在线访谈的适宜性]。","authors":"Yusaku Morita, Tetsuro Ishizawa, Koji Kandabashi, Hiroyuki Saito, Sonoko Sakuragi, Natsu Sasaki, Yukiko Sawada, Go Muto, Ayako Murayama, Chiaki Watanabe, Shigeyuki Kajiki","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2025-003-B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, there is an increased opportunity for occupational health professionals to conduct online interviews. However, to the best of our knowledge, research regarding adaptation to online interviewing is limited. Therefore, we developed a checklist as a reference for decision-making regarding the adaptation of online interviews.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Through online interview-adaptation group work, we identified considerations for adaptation of online interviews, including promoters and barriers. Based on our findings, a prototype version of a checklist was created. Public comments on the prototype were collected, and a survey was conducted to verify the validity of the checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one volunteers participated in the group work, resulting in a prototype checklist consisting of eight major categories and 32 sub-categories. We received 15 public comments on the prototype and 64 responses to the survey. More than 50% of the respondents indicated that online interviews should be avoided or that they would face difficulties if conducted. Based on public comments and additional opinions from the survey, the final version of the checklist was completed.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The final version of the online interview-adaptation checklist was confirmed as valid by experienced occupational health professionals. The checklist will guide appropriate decision-making regarding adaptation to online interviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":94204,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Checklist for occupational health professionals: Assessing suitability for online interviews using information and communication technology].\",\"authors\":\"Yusaku Morita, Tetsuro Ishizawa, Koji Kandabashi, Hiroyuki Saito, Sonoko Sakuragi, Natsu Sasaki, Yukiko Sawada, Go Muto, Ayako Murayama, Chiaki Watanabe, Shigeyuki Kajiki\",\"doi\":\"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2025-003-B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, there is an increased opportunity for occupational health professionals to conduct online interviews. However, to the best of our knowledge, research regarding adaptation to online interviewing is limited. Therefore, we developed a checklist as a reference for decision-making regarding the adaptation of online interviews.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Through online interview-adaptation group work, we identified considerations for adaptation of online interviews, including promoters and barriers. Based on our findings, a prototype version of a checklist was created. Public comments on the prototype were collected, and a survey was conducted to verify the validity of the checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one volunteers participated in the group work, resulting in a prototype checklist consisting of eight major categories and 32 sub-categories. We received 15 public comments on the prototype and 64 responses to the survey. More than 50% of the respondents indicated that online interviews should be avoided or that they would face difficulties if conducted. Based on public comments and additional opinions from the survey, the final version of the checklist was completed.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The final version of the online interview-adaptation checklist was confirmed as valid by experienced occupational health professionals. The checklist will guide appropriate decision-making regarding adaptation to online interviews.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2025-003-B\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2025-003-B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自SARS-CoV-2爆发以来,职业卫生专业人员进行在线访谈的机会增加。然而,据我们所知,关于适应在线面试的研究是有限的。因此,我们制定了一份清单,作为在线面试适应决策的参考。对象和方法:通过在线访谈适应小组工作,我们确定了在线访谈适应的考虑因素,包括促进因素和障碍。基于我们的发现,我们创建了一个检查表的原型版本。收集了公众对原型的意见,并进行了一项调查,以验证清单的有效性。结果:71名志愿者参与了小组工作,形成了一个由8个主要类别和32个小类别组成的原型清单。我们收到了15条关于原型的公众评论和64份调查回复。超过50%的受访者表示应避免进行网上访谈,否则会遇到困难。根据公众意见和来自调查的附加意见,清单的最终版本已经完成。讨论与结论:在线访谈-适应检查表的最终版本经经验丰富的职业卫生专业人员确认有效。该清单将指导有关适应在线面试的适当决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Checklist for occupational health professionals: Assessing suitability for online interviews using information and communication technology].

Objective: Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, there is an increased opportunity for occupational health professionals to conduct online interviews. However, to the best of our knowledge, research regarding adaptation to online interviewing is limited. Therefore, we developed a checklist as a reference for decision-making regarding the adaptation of online interviews.

Subjects and methods: Through online interview-adaptation group work, we identified considerations for adaptation of online interviews, including promoters and barriers. Based on our findings, a prototype version of a checklist was created. Public comments on the prototype were collected, and a survey was conducted to verify the validity of the checklist.

Results: Seventy-one volunteers participated in the group work, resulting in a prototype checklist consisting of eight major categories and 32 sub-categories. We received 15 public comments on the prototype and 64 responses to the survey. More than 50% of the respondents indicated that online interviews should be avoided or that they would face difficulties if conducted. Based on public comments and additional opinions from the survey, the final version of the checklist was completed.

Discussion and conclusion: The final version of the online interview-adaptation checklist was confirmed as valid by experienced occupational health professionals. The checklist will guide appropriate decision-making regarding adaptation to online interviews.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信