髌骨股关节置换的机器人技术——关节置换术的一个进步?]

Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1007/s00132-025-04653-4
Mara Hold, Henning Windhagen, Lars-Rene Tuecking
{"title":"髌骨股关节置换的机器人技术——关节置换术的一个进步?]","authors":"Mara Hold, Henning Windhagen, Lars-Rene Tuecking","doi":"10.1007/s00132-025-04653-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At 0.2% of all knee replacements implanted in Germany, patellofemoral joint arthroplasty (PFA) account for only a small proportion. However, the potential in the population appears to be significantly greater. In recent years, several robotic-assisted surgical procedures have been developed to increase precision in the implantation of endoprostheses. MAKO® SYSTEM: At present, the Mako® system from Stryker is the only system that can implant an isolated patellofemoral joint replacement robotically. It can be used to analyze and adequately address complex anatomies such as trochlear dysplasia. The system provides support by simulating the positioning of the prosthesis and the exact execution of the plan by aligning the saw or reamer with haptic feedback.</p><p><strong>Study situation: </strong>Studies on robotic-assisted PFA are rare but indicate improved precision with a robotic-assisted procedure. Despite that, an improved clinical and radiological outcome could not be demonstrated in a comparative study.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>A cost-benefit analysis should be discussed here, as should the necessary learning curve. In principle, robotic-assisted implantation of PFA appears to be a promising procedure. However, a superiority of this procedure over conventional methods cannot be postulated at the present time.</p>","PeriodicalId":74375,"journal":{"name":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"457-465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Robotics for patellofemoral joint replacement-a step forward in arthroplasty?]\",\"authors\":\"Mara Hold, Henning Windhagen, Lars-Rene Tuecking\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00132-025-04653-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At 0.2% of all knee replacements implanted in Germany, patellofemoral joint arthroplasty (PFA) account for only a small proportion. However, the potential in the population appears to be significantly greater. In recent years, several robotic-assisted surgical procedures have been developed to increase precision in the implantation of endoprostheses. MAKO® SYSTEM: At present, the Mako® system from Stryker is the only system that can implant an isolated patellofemoral joint replacement robotically. It can be used to analyze and adequately address complex anatomies such as trochlear dysplasia. The system provides support by simulating the positioning of the prosthesis and the exact execution of the plan by aligning the saw or reamer with haptic feedback.</p><p><strong>Study situation: </strong>Studies on robotic-assisted PFA are rare but indicate improved precision with a robotic-assisted procedure. Despite that, an improved clinical and radiological outcome could not be demonstrated in a comparative study.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>A cost-benefit analysis should be discussed here, as should the necessary learning curve. In principle, robotic-assisted implantation of PFA appears to be a promising procedure. However, a superiority of this procedure over conventional methods cannot be postulated at the present time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"457-465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-025-04653-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-025-04653-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在德国所有膝关节置换术中,髌骨股骨关节置换术(PFA)仅占0.2%。然而,人口中的潜力似乎要大得多。近年来,一些机器人辅助的外科手术已经被开发出来,以提高内假体植入的精度。MAKO®SYSTEM:目前,Stryker公司的MAKO®系统是唯一可以机器人植入孤立髌骨关节置换术的系统。它可以用来分析和充分解决复杂的解剖,如滑车发育不良。该系统通过模拟假体的定位和通过调整锯或铰刀的触觉反馈来精确执行计划来提供支持。研究现状:机器人辅助PFA的研究很少,但表明机器人辅助手术可以提高精度。尽管如此,临床和放射学结果的改善并不能在比较研究中得到证实。展望:这里应该讨论成本效益分析,以及必要的学习曲线。原则上,机器人辅助PFA植入似乎是一个有前途的过程。然而,目前还不能假设这种方法比传统方法优越。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Robotics for patellofemoral joint replacement-a step forward in arthroplasty?]

Background: At 0.2% of all knee replacements implanted in Germany, patellofemoral joint arthroplasty (PFA) account for only a small proportion. However, the potential in the population appears to be significantly greater. In recent years, several robotic-assisted surgical procedures have been developed to increase precision in the implantation of endoprostheses. MAKO® SYSTEM: At present, the Mako® system from Stryker is the only system that can implant an isolated patellofemoral joint replacement robotically. It can be used to analyze and adequately address complex anatomies such as trochlear dysplasia. The system provides support by simulating the positioning of the prosthesis and the exact execution of the plan by aligning the saw or reamer with haptic feedback.

Study situation: Studies on robotic-assisted PFA are rare but indicate improved precision with a robotic-assisted procedure. Despite that, an improved clinical and radiological outcome could not be demonstrated in a comparative study.

Outlook: A cost-benefit analysis should be discussed here, as should the necessary learning curve. In principle, robotic-assisted implantation of PFA appears to be a promising procedure. However, a superiority of this procedure over conventional methods cannot be postulated at the present time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信