在英国、德国和荷兰,政策支持如何促进综合护理项目的实施、规模和可持续性?给加拿大的教训。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stefanie Tan, Julie Farmer, Walter P Wodchis, Sara Allin
{"title":"在英国、德国和荷兰,政策支持如何促进综合护理项目的实施、规模和可持续性?给加拿大的教训。","authors":"Stefanie Tan, Julie Farmer, Walter P Wodchis, Sara Allin","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated care aims to coordinate the care needs of a population, particularly individuals requiring complex care, across community, primary and secondary care settings. This study explores policy supports for integrated models of care in England, Germany, and The Netherlands to consider the implications for policy transfer for Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed academic and grey literature about integrated models of care across three comparator countries and conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 14 expert informants in Autumn 2023. Results were mapped against a framework for analysis about policy supports and transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Integrated care initiatives varied in scale and scope with local population initiatives (Germany), devolved decision-making initiatives (England), or by addressing population subgroups (Netherlands). There are power and relative funding imbalances between the health and social services sectors that impede collaboration. Voluntary approaches to organisational governance reforms and partnerships with primary care providers promote uptake but policy entrepreneurs are crucial to facilitating implementation. Workforce adaptations and upskilling initiatives can enable interprofessional collaboration and intersectoral knowledge to address implementation gaps. There remain practical challenges with data infrastructure and sharing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Legislation is an important enabling factor for supporting governance. New financing streams can reward collaborative working for interdisciplinary teams. Policymakers at the macro- and meso‑level must support policy from intention to implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"105334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do policy supports enable the implementation, scale, and sustainability of integrated care programs in England, Germany, and The Netherlands? Lessons for Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Tan, Julie Farmer, Walter P Wodchis, Sara Allin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated care aims to coordinate the care needs of a population, particularly individuals requiring complex care, across community, primary and secondary care settings. This study explores policy supports for integrated models of care in England, Germany, and The Netherlands to consider the implications for policy transfer for Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed academic and grey literature about integrated models of care across three comparator countries and conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 14 expert informants in Autumn 2023. Results were mapped against a framework for analysis about policy supports and transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Integrated care initiatives varied in scale and scope with local population initiatives (Germany), devolved decision-making initiatives (England), or by addressing population subgroups (Netherlands). There are power and relative funding imbalances between the health and social services sectors that impede collaboration. Voluntary approaches to organisational governance reforms and partnerships with primary care providers promote uptake but policy entrepreneurs are crucial to facilitating implementation. Workforce adaptations and upskilling initiatives can enable interprofessional collaboration and intersectoral knowledge to address implementation gaps. There remain practical challenges with data infrastructure and sharing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Legislation is an important enabling factor for supporting governance. New financing streams can reward collaborative working for interdisciplinary teams. Policymakers at the macro- and meso‑level must support policy from intention to implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105334\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:综合护理旨在协调人群的护理需求,特别是需要复杂护理的个人,跨越社区、初级和二级保健机构。本研究探讨了英国、德国和荷兰对综合护理模式的政策支持,以考虑对加拿大政策转移的影响。方法:我们回顾了三个比较国关于综合护理模式的学术文献和灰色文献,并于2023年秋季对14名专家进行了深入的定性访谈。结果被映射到一个分析政策支持和转移的框架。结果:综合护理计划在规模和范围上因当地人口计划(德国)、权力下放的决策计划(英国)或针对人口分组(荷兰)而有所不同。卫生和社会服务部门之间存在权力和资金的相对不平衡,阻碍了合作。组织治理改革的自愿方法和与初级保健提供者的伙伴关系促进了吸收,但政策企业家对促进实施至关重要。劳动力适应和提高技能举措可以实现跨专业协作和跨部门知识,以解决实施差距。在数据基础设施和共享方面仍然存在实际挑战。结论:立法是支持治理的重要赋能因素。新的资金流可以奖励跨学科团队的协作工作。宏观和中观层面的政策制定者必须从政策意向到实施都给予支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do policy supports enable the implementation, scale, and sustainability of integrated care programs in England, Germany, and The Netherlands? Lessons for Canada.

Background: Integrated care aims to coordinate the care needs of a population, particularly individuals requiring complex care, across community, primary and secondary care settings. This study explores policy supports for integrated models of care in England, Germany, and The Netherlands to consider the implications for policy transfer for Canada.

Methods: We reviewed academic and grey literature about integrated models of care across three comparator countries and conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 14 expert informants in Autumn 2023. Results were mapped against a framework for analysis about policy supports and transfer.

Results: Integrated care initiatives varied in scale and scope with local population initiatives (Germany), devolved decision-making initiatives (England), or by addressing population subgroups (Netherlands). There are power and relative funding imbalances between the health and social services sectors that impede collaboration. Voluntary approaches to organisational governance reforms and partnerships with primary care providers promote uptake but policy entrepreneurs are crucial to facilitating implementation. Workforce adaptations and upskilling initiatives can enable interprofessional collaboration and intersectoral knowledge to address implementation gaps. There remain practical challenges with data infrastructure and sharing.

Conclusions: Legislation is an important enabling factor for supporting governance. New financing streams can reward collaborative working for interdisciplinary teams. Policymakers at the macro- and meso‑level must support policy from intention to implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信