大鼠模型中皮质类固醇注射对肩袖愈合的剂量无关不良反应。

Hikmet Şahin, Yavuz Akalın, Nazan Çevik, Özgür Avci, Harun Sağlıcak, Alpaslan Öztürk
{"title":"大鼠模型中皮质类固醇注射对肩袖愈合的剂量无关不良反应。","authors":"Hikmet Şahin, Yavuz Akalın, Nazan Çevik, Özgür Avci, Harun Sağlıcak, Alpaslan Öztürk","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2025.24075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective: The aim of this experimental study in a rat model was to investigate the biomechanical and histological effects of subacromial corticosteroid injections on the healing of the tendon-bone junction after repair in the rotator cuff tear model. Methods: A total of 48 rats were divided into 3 groups: the control group, the single-dose steroid group, and the 4-dose steroid group. The supraspinatus tendon was completely dissected from the footprint attachment site and repaired. Saline was injected into the subacromial area in the control group, while 0.6 mL-4.8 mg/kg of single-dose methylprednisolone was applied to the single-dose group, and the same dose was applied 4 times at 1-week intervals to the 4-dose steroid group. All animals were allowed unrestricted movement during this period, and all animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation 4 weeks after the last dose in the 4-dose steroid group. Cell shape and the number of apoptotic cells were assessed histopathologically, and the fracture load, maximum stress, and energy absorption were assessed biomechanically. Results: There were no significant differences in terms of cell shape between the groups. There was a significant difference in the mean number of apoptotic cells in the control group and in the single-dose and 4-dose steroid groups (P=.028). There was a 36% reduction in the mean number of apoptotic cells in the steroid groups compared to the control group. In the biomechanical evaluation, no differences were found between the groups in terms of maximum tension or breaking load (n.s.). A significant difference was found when the 3 groups were compared in terms of energy absorption (P=.001). There was a significant difference in energy absorption between the control group and the steroid-treated groups, but there was also a significant difference between the single-dose group and the 4-dose group (P=.038). Conclusion: The administration of corticosteroids was found to have a negative effect on healing at the tendon-bone junction, but this effect did not vary with the number of steroid injections. From a biomechanical perspective, it was observed that the energy absorption at the surgical repair site was lower with corticosteroid administration, and this negative effect increased with the increasing number of injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"59 2","pages":"100-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose-independent adverse effects of corticosteroid injections on rotator cuff healing in a rat model.\",\"authors\":\"Hikmet Şahin, Yavuz Akalın, Nazan Çevik, Özgür Avci, Harun Sağlıcak, Alpaslan Öztürk\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/j.aott.2025.24075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective: The aim of this experimental study in a rat model was to investigate the biomechanical and histological effects of subacromial corticosteroid injections on the healing of the tendon-bone junction after repair in the rotator cuff tear model. Methods: A total of 48 rats were divided into 3 groups: the control group, the single-dose steroid group, and the 4-dose steroid group. The supraspinatus tendon was completely dissected from the footprint attachment site and repaired. Saline was injected into the subacromial area in the control group, while 0.6 mL-4.8 mg/kg of single-dose methylprednisolone was applied to the single-dose group, and the same dose was applied 4 times at 1-week intervals to the 4-dose steroid group. All animals were allowed unrestricted movement during this period, and all animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation 4 weeks after the last dose in the 4-dose steroid group. Cell shape and the number of apoptotic cells were assessed histopathologically, and the fracture load, maximum stress, and energy absorption were assessed biomechanically. Results: There were no significant differences in terms of cell shape between the groups. There was a significant difference in the mean number of apoptotic cells in the control group and in the single-dose and 4-dose steroid groups (P=.028). There was a 36% reduction in the mean number of apoptotic cells in the steroid groups compared to the control group. In the biomechanical evaluation, no differences were found between the groups in terms of maximum tension or breaking load (n.s.). A significant difference was found when the 3 groups were compared in terms of energy absorption (P=.001). There was a significant difference in energy absorption between the control group and the steroid-treated groups, but there was also a significant difference between the single-dose group and the 4-dose group (P=.038). Conclusion: The administration of corticosteroids was found to have a negative effect on healing at the tendon-bone junction, but this effect did not vary with the number of steroid injections. From a biomechanical perspective, it was observed that the energy absorption at the surgical repair site was lower with corticosteroid administration, and this negative effect increased with the increasing number of injections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"volume\":\"59 2\",\"pages\":\"100-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070444/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2025.24075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2025.24075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用大鼠模型研究肩峰下皮质类固醇注射对肩袖撕裂模型修复后肌腱-骨交界处愈合的生物力学和组织学影响。方法:将48只大鼠分为3组:对照组、单剂量类固醇组和4剂量类固醇组。将冈上肌腱从足印附着部位完全剥离并修复。对照组在肩峰下注射生理盐水,单剂量组给予单剂量甲基强的松龙0.6 mL-4.8 mg/kg, 4剂量类固醇组给予相同剂量,每隔1周给予4次。在此期间,所有动物允许不受限制的活动,在4剂量类固醇组最后一次给药后4周,所有动物均以颈椎脱臼处死。组织病理学评估细胞形状和凋亡细胞数量,生物力学评估断裂负荷、最大应力和能量吸收。结果:两组间细胞形态无明显差异。对照组与单剂量和4剂量类固醇组的平均凋亡细胞数比较,差异有统计学意义(P= 0.028)。与对照组相比,类固醇组的平均凋亡细胞数量减少了36%。在生物力学评估中,两组之间在最大张力或断裂载荷方面没有发现差异(n.s.)。3组能量吸收比较差异有统计学意义(P= 0.001)。对照组与类固醇治疗组能量吸收差异有统计学意义,单剂量组与4剂量组能量吸收差异有统计学意义(P= 0.038)。结论:皮质类固醇的使用对肌腱-骨交界处的愈合有负面影响,但这种影响不随类固醇注射次数的增加而变化。从生物力学的角度来看,我们观察到皮质类固醇的使用降低了手术修复部位的能量吸收,并且这种负面影响随着注射次数的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dose-independent adverse effects of corticosteroid injections on rotator cuff healing in a rat model.

Objective: The aim of this experimental study in a rat model was to investigate the biomechanical and histological effects of subacromial corticosteroid injections on the healing of the tendon-bone junction after repair in the rotator cuff tear model. Methods: A total of 48 rats were divided into 3 groups: the control group, the single-dose steroid group, and the 4-dose steroid group. The supraspinatus tendon was completely dissected from the footprint attachment site and repaired. Saline was injected into the subacromial area in the control group, while 0.6 mL-4.8 mg/kg of single-dose methylprednisolone was applied to the single-dose group, and the same dose was applied 4 times at 1-week intervals to the 4-dose steroid group. All animals were allowed unrestricted movement during this period, and all animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation 4 weeks after the last dose in the 4-dose steroid group. Cell shape and the number of apoptotic cells were assessed histopathologically, and the fracture load, maximum stress, and energy absorption were assessed biomechanically. Results: There were no significant differences in terms of cell shape between the groups. There was a significant difference in the mean number of apoptotic cells in the control group and in the single-dose and 4-dose steroid groups (P=.028). There was a 36% reduction in the mean number of apoptotic cells in the steroid groups compared to the control group. In the biomechanical evaluation, no differences were found between the groups in terms of maximum tension or breaking load (n.s.). A significant difference was found when the 3 groups were compared in terms of energy absorption (P=.001). There was a significant difference in energy absorption between the control group and the steroid-treated groups, but there was also a significant difference between the single-dose group and the 4-dose group (P=.038). Conclusion: The administration of corticosteroids was found to have a negative effect on healing at the tendon-bone junction, but this effect did not vary with the number of steroid injections. From a biomechanical perspective, it was observed that the energy absorption at the surgical repair site was lower with corticosteroid administration, and this negative effect increased with the increasing number of injections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信