比较两种基因表达谱检测与标准护理在识别低前哨淋巴结阳性风险皮肤黑色素瘤患者中的应用

Cancer diagnosis & prognosis Pub Date : 2025-05-03 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.21873/cdp.10438
Peter A Prieto, Laura K Ferris, Michael J Guenther
{"title":"比较两种基因表达谱检测与标准护理在识别低前哨淋巴结阳性风险皮肤黑色素瘤患者中的应用","authors":"Peter A Prieto, Laura K Ferris, Michael J Guenther","doi":"10.21873/cdp.10438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for cutaneous melanoma (CM) recommend avoiding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) when the positivity risk is <5%, considering SLNB when the risk is 5-10%, or offering SLNB when the risk is >10%. Most patients undergoing SLNB have a negative result, showing that reliance upon the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T-stage alone results in most patients undergoing an unnecessary, negative, unreliable, invasive procedure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two gene expression profile (GEP) tests, the CP-GEP and the 31-GEP, have been developed to identify patients at low risk of SLN positivity who may consider avoiding SLNB. We analyzed the accuracy of the CP-GEP and 31-GEP in identifying patients with <5% risk of SLN positivity across the five validation studies of the CP-GEP and four validation studies of the 31-GEP in T1-T2 tumors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients considered low risk by the CP-GEP had an SLN positivity rate of 6.2%, higher than the risk threshold of 5% used by the NCCN to guide SLNB decisions. In contrast, patients considered low risk by the 31-GEP or i31-SLNB had a 2.8% SLN positivity rate, a substantial improvement over AJCC-staging guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the CP-GEP did not perform as well as AJCC, while the 31-GEP performed better than AJCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72510,"journal":{"name":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","volume":"5 3","pages":"261-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Two Gene Expression Profile Tests to Standard of Care for Identifying Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma at Low Risk of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity.\",\"authors\":\"Peter A Prieto, Laura K Ferris, Michael J Guenther\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/cdp.10438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for cutaneous melanoma (CM) recommend avoiding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) when the positivity risk is <5%, considering SLNB when the risk is 5-10%, or offering SLNB when the risk is >10%. Most patients undergoing SLNB have a negative result, showing that reliance upon the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T-stage alone results in most patients undergoing an unnecessary, negative, unreliable, invasive procedure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two gene expression profile (GEP) tests, the CP-GEP and the 31-GEP, have been developed to identify patients at low risk of SLN positivity who may consider avoiding SLNB. We analyzed the accuracy of the CP-GEP and 31-GEP in identifying patients with <5% risk of SLN positivity across the five validation studies of the CP-GEP and four validation studies of the 31-GEP in T1-T2 tumors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients considered low risk by the CP-GEP had an SLN positivity rate of 6.2%, higher than the risk threshold of 5% used by the NCCN to guide SLNB decisions. In contrast, patients considered low risk by the 31-GEP or i31-SLNB had a 2.8% SLN positivity rate, a substantial improvement over AJCC-staging guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the CP-GEP did not perform as well as AJCC, while the 31-GEP performed better than AJCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"261-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046662/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10438\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)皮肤黑色素瘤(CM)指南建议当阳性风险为10%时避免前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)。大多数接受SLNB的患者结果为阴性,这表明仅依赖美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)的t期治疗导致大多数患者接受了不必要的、阴性的、不可靠的、侵入性的手术。材料和方法:已经开发了两种基因表达谱(GEP)测试,CP-GEP和31-GEP,用于识别可能考虑避免SLNB的低风险SLN阳性患者。我们分析了CP-GEP和31-GEP识别SLNB患者的准确性。结果:CP-GEP认为低风险患者的SLN阳性率为6.2%,高于NCCN用于指导SLNB决策的风险阈值5%。相比之下,31-GEP或i31-SLNB认为低风险的患者有2.8%的SLN阳性率,比ajcc分期指导有很大改善。结论:总体而言,CP-GEP的疗效不如AJCC,而31-GEP的疗效优于AJCC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Two Gene Expression Profile Tests to Standard of Care for Identifying Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma at Low Risk of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity.

Background/aim: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for cutaneous melanoma (CM) recommend avoiding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) when the positivity risk is <5%, considering SLNB when the risk is 5-10%, or offering SLNB when the risk is >10%. Most patients undergoing SLNB have a negative result, showing that reliance upon the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T-stage alone results in most patients undergoing an unnecessary, negative, unreliable, invasive procedure.

Materials and methods: Two gene expression profile (GEP) tests, the CP-GEP and the 31-GEP, have been developed to identify patients at low risk of SLN positivity who may consider avoiding SLNB. We analyzed the accuracy of the CP-GEP and 31-GEP in identifying patients with <5% risk of SLN positivity across the five validation studies of the CP-GEP and four validation studies of the 31-GEP in T1-T2 tumors.

Results: Patients considered low risk by the CP-GEP had an SLN positivity rate of 6.2%, higher than the risk threshold of 5% used by the NCCN to guide SLNB decisions. In contrast, patients considered low risk by the 31-GEP or i31-SLNB had a 2.8% SLN positivity rate, a substantial improvement over AJCC-staging guidance.

Conclusion: Overall, the CP-GEP did not perform as well as AJCC, while the 31-GEP performed better than AJCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信