选择和试验史对精神分裂症谱系障碍因果知觉的影响。

IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Kai Streiling, Rasmus Schülke, Benjamin Straube, Loes C J van Dam
{"title":"选择和试验史对精神分裂症谱系障碍因果知觉的影响。","authors":"Kai Streiling, Rasmus Schülke, Benjamin Straube, Loes C J van Dam","doi":"10.1038/s41537-025-00614-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceiving causality is a low-level, immediate cognitive process based on temporal and spatial cues relating to sensory events and could be viewed as a perceptual judgement. Perceptual judgements in general are affected by a choice- and trial history bias, however, it is not yet fully understood how such a bias integrates into the perception of causality. Here, we investigate judgements of perceptual causality in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder (SSD) as a perceptual decision process with systematic influences from past choices and experiences. We analysed previously collected data from a causality-judgement experiment using Michotte launching events and examined differences between patients with SSD (SSDs) and healthy control participants (HCs). We did this on several levels to shed light on known dysfunctions in the judgement of cause-effect relations in SSD, such as the jumping-to-conclusions bias. Using multiple Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models (GLMMs) revealed a significant direct influence of the choice-history for both participant groups. Trial-history (previous stimulus experiences) on the other hand appears to exert a more subtle influence on the current choice by modulating the effect of choice-history and current spatial and temporal properties. Regarding the stimulus of a given trial, SSDs relied more on spatial properties and less on temporal properties than HCs. Furthermore, an analysis of effects across time suggested an increasing reliance on previous choices for SSDs, and a decreasing effect for HCs. This hints towards a potentially maladaptive pattern which might contribute to biased causal attributions in SSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":74758,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":"11 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice- and trial-history effects on causality perception in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Kai Streiling, Rasmus Schülke, Benjamin Straube, Loes C J van Dam\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41537-025-00614-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Perceiving causality is a low-level, immediate cognitive process based on temporal and spatial cues relating to sensory events and could be viewed as a perceptual judgement. Perceptual judgements in general are affected by a choice- and trial history bias, however, it is not yet fully understood how such a bias integrates into the perception of causality. Here, we investigate judgements of perceptual causality in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder (SSD) as a perceptual decision process with systematic influences from past choices and experiences. We analysed previously collected data from a causality-judgement experiment using Michotte launching events and examined differences between patients with SSD (SSDs) and healthy control participants (HCs). We did this on several levels to shed light on known dysfunctions in the judgement of cause-effect relations in SSD, such as the jumping-to-conclusions bias. Using multiple Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models (GLMMs) revealed a significant direct influence of the choice-history for both participant groups. Trial-history (previous stimulus experiences) on the other hand appears to exert a more subtle influence on the current choice by modulating the effect of choice-history and current spatial and temporal properties. Regarding the stimulus of a given trial, SSDs relied more on spatial properties and less on temporal properties than HCs. Furthermore, an analysis of effects across time suggested an increasing reliance on previous choices for SSDs, and a decreasing effect for HCs. This hints towards a potentially maladaptive pattern which might contribute to biased causal attributions in SSD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006371/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-025-00614-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-025-00614-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感知因果关系是一种低级的、即时的认知过程,它基于与感官事件相关的时间和空间线索,可以被视为一种感知判断。一般来说,感性判断受到选择和试验历史偏差的影响,然而,这种偏差如何与因果关系的感知相结合尚不完全清楚。在这里,我们研究了精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)的知觉因果关系判断作为一个知觉决策过程,受到过去的选择和经验的系统影响。我们分析了先前从Michotte启动事件的因果判断实验中收集的数据,并检查了SSD患者(SSD)和健康对照参与者(hc)之间的差异。我们在几个层面上这样做,以阐明SSD中因果关系判断的已知功能障碍,例如直接得出结论的偏见。使用多个广义线性混合效应模型(glmm)揭示了两个参与者群体的选择历史的显著直接影响。另一方面,试验历史(以前的刺激经历)似乎通过调节选择历史和当前空间和时间特性的影响,对当前的选择施加更微妙的影响。对于给定试验的刺激,ssd比hc更多地依赖于空间特性,而较少依赖于时间特性。此外,一项跨时间的影响分析表明,人们越来越依赖于以前选择的ssd,而对hc的影响越来越小。这暗示了一种潜在的适应不良模式,可能会导致SSD中有偏见的因果归因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choice- and trial-history effects on causality perception in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder.

Perceiving causality is a low-level, immediate cognitive process based on temporal and spatial cues relating to sensory events and could be viewed as a perceptual judgement. Perceptual judgements in general are affected by a choice- and trial history bias, however, it is not yet fully understood how such a bias integrates into the perception of causality. Here, we investigate judgements of perceptual causality in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder (SSD) as a perceptual decision process with systematic influences from past choices and experiences. We analysed previously collected data from a causality-judgement experiment using Michotte launching events and examined differences between patients with SSD (SSDs) and healthy control participants (HCs). We did this on several levels to shed light on known dysfunctions in the judgement of cause-effect relations in SSD, such as the jumping-to-conclusions bias. Using multiple Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models (GLMMs) revealed a significant direct influence of the choice-history for both participant groups. Trial-history (previous stimulus experiences) on the other hand appears to exert a more subtle influence on the current choice by modulating the effect of choice-history and current spatial and temporal properties. Regarding the stimulus of a given trial, SSDs relied more on spatial properties and less on temporal properties than HCs. Furthermore, an analysis of effects across time suggested an increasing reliance on previous choices for SSDs, and a decreasing effect for HCs. This hints towards a potentially maladaptive pattern which might contribute to biased causal attributions in SSD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信