护理人员护理模式在一般实践中的实施和可接受性:一项混合方法可行性研究。

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mette Kjaergaard Nielsen, Marie Cecilie Vinther, Mai-Britt Guldin, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Anna Mygind
{"title":"护理人员护理模式在一般实践中的实施和可接受性:一项混合方法可行性研究。","authors":"Mette Kjaergaard Nielsen, Marie Cecilie Vinther, Mai-Britt Guldin, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Anna Mygind","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02833-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Being a caregiver can be demanding. Therefore, we developed the Caregiver Care Model for general practice. The model consists of a mandatory dialogue questionnaire, which is used to identify support needs in caregivers, grief-facilitating questions, and an overview of community-based caregiver initiatives for caregivers in need of support. We aimed to test the implementation and acceptability of the model in general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a fixed, convergent, mixed-methods approach to test the model in five general practices in the Central Denmark Region among 40 caregivers. Quantitative data included monitoring data collected by health professionals in an online database at inclusion and after each consultation. Qualitative data were derived from five introductory meetings and semi-structured interviews with ten health professionals. The analysis focused on the implementation (delivery and process) and the health professionals' acceptability of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 40 caregivers participated in the first consultation, and 29 (73%) had two or more consultations. Eight caregivers (20%) were referred to community-based initiatives or a private-practice psychologist. The mandatory dialogue questionnaire was completed by 30 (75%) caregivers prior to the first consultation, and it was rated useful by general practitioners (GPs) and staff in 26 (74%) of encounters. GPs and staff perceived the dialogue questionnaire to be useful to direct the first consultations towards the most relevant issues, whereas the usefulness of the facilitating questions was unclear due to the brief introduction to them. The list of community-based initiatives was considered useful in urban areas, but not in rural areas with long distance to initiatives. Here, support from general practice was needed to promote mental health in caregivers and avoid sick leave.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Caregiver Care Model was in line with core values of general practice and the dialogue questionnaire targeted the consultations on relevant issues for the caregiver. Health professionals provided targeted support, including follow-up consultations and referred a group for community-based initiatives, especially caregivers in urban settings. The findings call for increased focus on caregivers and education of general practitioners and staff to facilitate caregiver reactions in connection with loss and grief.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and acceptability of the Caregiver Care Model in general practice: a mixed-method feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Mette Kjaergaard Nielsen, Marie Cecilie Vinther, Mai-Britt Guldin, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Anna Mygind\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-02833-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Being a caregiver can be demanding. Therefore, we developed the Caregiver Care Model for general practice. The model consists of a mandatory dialogue questionnaire, which is used to identify support needs in caregivers, grief-facilitating questions, and an overview of community-based caregiver initiatives for caregivers in need of support. We aimed to test the implementation and acceptability of the model in general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a fixed, convergent, mixed-methods approach to test the model in five general practices in the Central Denmark Region among 40 caregivers. Quantitative data included monitoring data collected by health professionals in an online database at inclusion and after each consultation. Qualitative data were derived from five introductory meetings and semi-structured interviews with ten health professionals. The analysis focused on the implementation (delivery and process) and the health professionals' acceptability of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 40 caregivers participated in the first consultation, and 29 (73%) had two or more consultations. Eight caregivers (20%) were referred to community-based initiatives or a private-practice psychologist. The mandatory dialogue questionnaire was completed by 30 (75%) caregivers prior to the first consultation, and it was rated useful by general practitioners (GPs) and staff in 26 (74%) of encounters. GPs and staff perceived the dialogue questionnaire to be useful to direct the first consultations towards the most relevant issues, whereas the usefulness of the facilitating questions was unclear due to the brief introduction to them. The list of community-based initiatives was considered useful in urban areas, but not in rural areas with long distance to initiatives. Here, support from general practice was needed to promote mental health in caregivers and avoid sick leave.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Caregiver Care Model was in line with core values of general practice and the dialogue questionnaire targeted the consultations on relevant issues for the caregiver. Health professionals provided targeted support, including follow-up consultations and referred a group for community-based initiatives, especially caregivers in urban settings. The findings call for increased focus on caregivers and education of general practitioners and staff to facilitate caregiver reactions in connection with loss and grief.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044925/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02833-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02833-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:做一名照顾者可能会要求很高。因此,我们为全科医生开发了护理人员护理模型。该模型包括一个强制性的对话问卷,用于确定护理人员的支持需求,促进悲伤的问题,以及对需要支持的护理人员的社区护理人员倡议的概述。我们的目标是在一般实践中测试模型的实现和可接受性。方法:我们使用固定的,收敛的,混合方法的方法来测试该模型在丹麦中部地区的40名护理人员的五个一般做法。定量数据包括卫生专业人员在每次会诊时和会诊后在在线数据库中收集的监测数据。定性数据来自5次介绍性会议和对10名卫生专业人员的半结构化访谈。分析的重点是该模型的实施(交付和过程)以及卫生专业人员对该模型的接受程度。结果:所有40名护理人员参加了第一次咨询,29名(73%)进行了两次或两次以上咨询。八名护理人员(20%)被转介到社区倡议或私人执业心理学家。30名(75%)护理人员在第一次会诊前完成了强制性对话问卷,26次(74%)会诊中全科医生(gp)和工作人员认为问卷有用。全科医生和工作人员认为对话调查表有助于将第一次协商引向最相关的问题,而由于对这些问题的介绍很简短,因此不清楚这些促进性问题是否有用。以社区为基础的倡议清单被认为对城市地区有用,但对距离倡议很远的农村地区则没用。在这方面,需要全科医生的支持,以促进护理人员的心理健康,避免请病假。结论:照护者关怀模式符合全科医学的核心价值观,对话问卷针对的是照护者对相关问题的协商。卫生专业人员提供了有针对性的支持,包括后续咨询,并介绍了一组人参加社区倡议,特别是城市环境中的护理人员。研究结果呼吁加强对照顾者的关注,并对全科医生和工作人员进行教育,以促进照顾者对失去亲人和悲伤的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation and acceptability of the Caregiver Care Model in general practice: a mixed-method feasibility study.

Background: Being a caregiver can be demanding. Therefore, we developed the Caregiver Care Model for general practice. The model consists of a mandatory dialogue questionnaire, which is used to identify support needs in caregivers, grief-facilitating questions, and an overview of community-based caregiver initiatives for caregivers in need of support. We aimed to test the implementation and acceptability of the model in general practice.

Methods: We used a fixed, convergent, mixed-methods approach to test the model in five general practices in the Central Denmark Region among 40 caregivers. Quantitative data included monitoring data collected by health professionals in an online database at inclusion and after each consultation. Qualitative data were derived from five introductory meetings and semi-structured interviews with ten health professionals. The analysis focused on the implementation (delivery and process) and the health professionals' acceptability of the model.

Results: All 40 caregivers participated in the first consultation, and 29 (73%) had two or more consultations. Eight caregivers (20%) were referred to community-based initiatives or a private-practice psychologist. The mandatory dialogue questionnaire was completed by 30 (75%) caregivers prior to the first consultation, and it was rated useful by general practitioners (GPs) and staff in 26 (74%) of encounters. GPs and staff perceived the dialogue questionnaire to be useful to direct the first consultations towards the most relevant issues, whereas the usefulness of the facilitating questions was unclear due to the brief introduction to them. The list of community-based initiatives was considered useful in urban areas, but not in rural areas with long distance to initiatives. Here, support from general practice was needed to promote mental health in caregivers and avoid sick leave.

Conclusion: The Caregiver Care Model was in line with core values of general practice and the dialogue questionnaire targeted the consultations on relevant issues for the caregiver. Health professionals provided targeted support, including follow-up consultations and referred a group for community-based initiatives, especially caregivers in urban settings. The findings call for increased focus on caregivers and education of general practitioners and staff to facilitate caregiver reactions in connection with loss and grief.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信