全身冷冻刺激(WBC)禁忌症。国际制冷学会WBC工作组和多学科专家小组的立场文件。

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2025.1567402
Paolo Capodaglio, Angelo Alito, Benoit Michel Duguè, Romain Bouzigon, Giovanni Lombardi, Elzbieta Dorota Miller, Federica Verme, Giuseppe Modaffari, Paolo Piterà, Ewa Ziemann, Jacopo Maria Fontana
{"title":"全身冷冻刺激(WBC)禁忌症。国际制冷学会WBC工作组和多学科专家小组的立场文件。","authors":"Paolo Capodaglio, Angelo Alito, Benoit Michel Duguè, Romain Bouzigon, Giovanni Lombardi, Elzbieta Dorota Miller, Federica Verme, Giuseppe Modaffari, Paolo Piterà, Ewa Ziemann, Jacopo Maria Fontana","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1567402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole-Body Cryostimulation (WBC) is a treatment that involves short exposures of the entire body to very cold and dry air in specially adapted cryochambers. A growing body of literature suggests the safe application of this technique in medical settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary purpose of this study was to generate an international consensus on the updated contraindications for WBC through an interactive process of questionnaire interspersed with controlled feedback from a steering committee.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study design was based on a systematic review of the literature and Delphi methodology.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Administration of electronic online questionnaires concerning contraindications to WBC.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>A multidisciplinary panel of 48 experts in the fields of rehabilitation, cardiology, neurology, endocrinology, oncology, clinical nutrition or in the clinical application of WBC was invited to participate in this consensus study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases was carried out to identify possible items for inclusion in a form. A two-round Delphi survey was then conducted according to international guidelines, consisting of an electronic online questionnaire. The experts had to rate their agreement with each item in the questionnaires on a 5-point Likert scale. Expert consensus was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 European experts participated in the Delphi survey. The first round consisted of 59 items, 3 of which were discarded after data analysis. The second round was rearranged according to the previous suggestions of the panellists. All 28 experts completed the two rounds. At the end of the survey, consensus was reached and a final list of temporal and absolute contraindications to WBC was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This process resulted in multidisciplinary expert consensus statements on contraindications to WBC. The European experts agreed on most of the decisions and produced a list of contraindications.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>The results provide a robust evidence framework to help clinicians improve clinical practice and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1567402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contraindications to Whole-Body Cryostimulation (WBC). A position paper from the WBC Working Group of the International Institute of Refrigeration and the multidisciplinary expert panel.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Capodaglio, Angelo Alito, Benoit Michel Duguè, Romain Bouzigon, Giovanni Lombardi, Elzbieta Dorota Miller, Federica Verme, Giuseppe Modaffari, Paolo Piterà, Ewa Ziemann, Jacopo Maria Fontana\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fresc.2025.1567402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole-Body Cryostimulation (WBC) is a treatment that involves short exposures of the entire body to very cold and dry air in specially adapted cryochambers. A growing body of literature suggests the safe application of this technique in medical settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary purpose of this study was to generate an international consensus on the updated contraindications for WBC through an interactive process of questionnaire interspersed with controlled feedback from a steering committee.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study design was based on a systematic review of the literature and Delphi methodology.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Administration of electronic online questionnaires concerning contraindications to WBC.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>A multidisciplinary panel of 48 experts in the fields of rehabilitation, cardiology, neurology, endocrinology, oncology, clinical nutrition or in the clinical application of WBC was invited to participate in this consensus study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases was carried out to identify possible items for inclusion in a form. A two-round Delphi survey was then conducted according to international guidelines, consisting of an electronic online questionnaire. The experts had to rate their agreement with each item in the questionnaires on a 5-point Likert scale. Expert consensus was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 European experts participated in the Delphi survey. The first round consisted of 59 items, 3 of which were discarded after data analysis. The second round was rearranged according to the previous suggestions of the panellists. All 28 experts completed the two rounds. At the end of the survey, consensus was reached and a final list of temporal and absolute contraindications to WBC was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This process resulted in multidisciplinary expert consensus statements on contraindications to WBC. The European experts agreed on most of the decisions and produced a list of contraindications.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>The results provide a robust evidence framework to help clinicians improve clinical practice and patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1567402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037594/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1567402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1567402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全身冷冻刺激(WBC)是一种治疗方法,将整个身体短时间暴露在特别适应的冷冻室内非常寒冷和干燥的空气中。越来越多的文献表明这种技术在医疗环境中的安全应用。目的:本研究的主要目的是通过问卷调查的互动过程,与指导委员会的受控反馈相结合,就WBC的最新禁忌症达成国际共识。设计:研究设计基于文献系统回顾和德尔菲法。设置:管理关于白细胞计数禁忌症的电子在线问卷。人群:一个由康复、心脏病学、神经学、内分泌学、肿瘤学、临床营养学或白细胞临床应用领域的48名专家组成的多学科小组被邀请参加这项共识研究。方法:系统检索PubMed、Scopus和Embase数据库,确定可纳入表格的项目。然后根据国际准则进行了两轮德尔菲调查,包括电子在线问卷。专家们必须按照5分的李克特量表对他们对问卷中每个项目的同意程度进行评分。评估专家共识。结果:共有28位欧洲专家参与了德尔菲调查。第一轮共59项,经数据分析,其中3项被丢弃。第二轮根据小组成员之前的建议重新安排。28名专家全部完成了两轮测试。在调查结束时,达成了共识,并确定了WBC的时间和绝对禁忌症的最终清单。结论:这一过程导致了多学科专家对白细胞禁忌症的共识声明。欧洲专家对大多数决定达成一致,并列出了一份禁忌症清单。临床康复影响:结果提供了一个强有力的证据框架,以帮助临床医生改善临床实践和患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contraindications to Whole-Body Cryostimulation (WBC). A position paper from the WBC Working Group of the International Institute of Refrigeration and the multidisciplinary expert panel.

Background: Whole-Body Cryostimulation (WBC) is a treatment that involves short exposures of the entire body to very cold and dry air in specially adapted cryochambers. A growing body of literature suggests the safe application of this technique in medical settings.

Aim: The primary purpose of this study was to generate an international consensus on the updated contraindications for WBC through an interactive process of questionnaire interspersed with controlled feedback from a steering committee.

Design: The study design was based on a systematic review of the literature and Delphi methodology.

Setting: Administration of electronic online questionnaires concerning contraindications to WBC.

Population: A multidisciplinary panel of 48 experts in the fields of rehabilitation, cardiology, neurology, endocrinology, oncology, clinical nutrition or in the clinical application of WBC was invited to participate in this consensus study.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases was carried out to identify possible items for inclusion in a form. A two-round Delphi survey was then conducted according to international guidelines, consisting of an electronic online questionnaire. The experts had to rate their agreement with each item in the questionnaires on a 5-point Likert scale. Expert consensus was assessed.

Results: A total of 28 European experts participated in the Delphi survey. The first round consisted of 59 items, 3 of which were discarded after data analysis. The second round was rearranged according to the previous suggestions of the panellists. All 28 experts completed the two rounds. At the end of the survey, consensus was reached and a final list of temporal and absolute contraindications to WBC was identified.

Conclusions: This process resulted in multidisciplinary expert consensus statements on contraindications to WBC. The European experts agreed on most of the decisions and produced a list of contraindications.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: The results provide a robust evidence framework to help clinicians improve clinical practice and patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信