并指释放与植皮或植皮替代品:一项受试者内对照试验。

Deborah C Bohn, Jamie N Price, Susan A Novotny, Tonye S Sylvanus, Ann E Van Heest
{"title":"并指释放与植皮或植皮替代品:一项受试者内对照试验。","authors":"Deborah C Bohn, Jamie N Price, Susan A Novotny, Tonye S Sylvanus, Ann E Van Heest","doi":"10.1177/17531934251334359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed scar healing over a 24-month period after syndactyly release using full-thickness skin autograft or hyaluronic acid matrix skin autograft substitute. A randomized, single-anonymized, within-subject controlled study was used to compare the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid matrix with full-thickness skin autograft, for 40 webs in 18 patients (mean age 1.2 (SD 0.8) years) undergoing syndactyly release. Hyaluronic acid matrix was used on one side of the web and a full-thickness skin autograft on the other. At 12 and 24 months after surgery, healing was assessed using two scar assessment scales and family/surgeon preferences. Results at final follow-up showed that hyaluronic acid matrix and full-thickness skin autograft had no significant differences in scar formation. When compared with full-thickness skin autograft, hyaluronic acid matrix decreases surgical time and has no donor site morbidity; however, there is an open wound for a longer time after operation, with increased requirements for wound care.<b>Level of evidence:</b> II.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"17531934251334359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Syndactyly release with skin graft or skin graft substitute: a within-subject controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Deborah C Bohn, Jamie N Price, Susan A Novotny, Tonye S Sylvanus, Ann E Van Heest\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17531934251334359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study assessed scar healing over a 24-month period after syndactyly release using full-thickness skin autograft or hyaluronic acid matrix skin autograft substitute. A randomized, single-anonymized, within-subject controlled study was used to compare the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid matrix with full-thickness skin autograft, for 40 webs in 18 patients (mean age 1.2 (SD 0.8) years) undergoing syndactyly release. Hyaluronic acid matrix was used on one side of the web and a full-thickness skin autograft on the other. At 12 and 24 months after surgery, healing was assessed using two scar assessment scales and family/surgeon preferences. Results at final follow-up showed that hyaluronic acid matrix and full-thickness skin autograft had no significant differences in scar formation. When compared with full-thickness skin autograft, hyaluronic acid matrix decreases surgical time and has no donor site morbidity; however, there is an open wound for a longer time after operation, with increased requirements for wound care.<b>Level of evidence:</b> II.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17531934251334359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251334359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251334359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了使用全层自体皮肤或透明质酸基质自体皮肤替代物在并指释放后24个月的疤痕愈合情况。一项随机、单匿名、受试者内对照研究用于比较透明质酸基质与全层自体皮肤移植的有效性,对18例(平均年龄1.2岁(SD 0.8)岁)接受并指释放的40例患者的有效性。在网的一侧使用透明质酸基质,另一侧使用全层自体皮肤移植物。术后12个月和24个月,使用两种疤痕评估量表和家庭/外科医生偏好评估愈合情况。最后随访结果显示,透明质酸基质与全层自体皮肤移植在瘢痕形成方面无显著差异。与全层自体皮肤移植相比,透明质酸基质减少了手术时间,无供区并发症;然而,术后开放性创面持续时间较长,对创面护理的要求增加。证据水平:II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Syndactyly release with skin graft or skin graft substitute: a within-subject controlled trial.

This study assessed scar healing over a 24-month period after syndactyly release using full-thickness skin autograft or hyaluronic acid matrix skin autograft substitute. A randomized, single-anonymized, within-subject controlled study was used to compare the effectiveness of hyaluronic acid matrix with full-thickness skin autograft, for 40 webs in 18 patients (mean age 1.2 (SD 0.8) years) undergoing syndactyly release. Hyaluronic acid matrix was used on one side of the web and a full-thickness skin autograft on the other. At 12 and 24 months after surgery, healing was assessed using two scar assessment scales and family/surgeon preferences. Results at final follow-up showed that hyaluronic acid matrix and full-thickness skin autograft had no significant differences in scar formation. When compared with full-thickness skin autograft, hyaluronic acid matrix decreases surgical time and has no donor site morbidity; however, there is an open wound for a longer time after operation, with increased requirements for wound care.Level of evidence: II.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信