卒中临床医生口腔保健教育干预的特点和效果:一项范围综述。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Ajesh George, Lien Lombardo, Shilpi Ajwani, Rochelle Wynne, Paula Sanchez, Ariana Kong, Bhavya Talluri, Scott William, Caleb Ferguson
{"title":"卒中临床医生口腔保健教育干预的特点和效果:一项范围综述。","authors":"Ajesh George, Lien Lombardo, Shilpi Ajwani, Rochelle Wynne, Paula Sanchez, Ariana Kong, Bhavya Talluri, Scott William, Caleb Ferguson","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the characteristics of oral healthcare education interventions for stroke clinicians and the effectiveness of these interventions in improving the oral health knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and practice among acute stroke clinicians.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review, guided by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Original full-text studies reporting educational oral healthcare interventions for stroke clinicians, including but not limited to nurses, were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were extracted and appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklist aligned to the study methodology. Narrative synthesis was used to describe heterogeneous findings.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Key electronic bibliographic databases including CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest, Pubmed, and Scopus, in addition to grey literature, were searched for studies published between 1st January 2000 and 20th January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies conducted in acute inpatient settings were included: two randomised controlled trials, two mixed-methods studies, and one quality improvement project. Most (n = 4) studies developed complex interventions that included education and other components (products, referral pathways, assessment tools), and were delivered either face-to-face or as an online program. Most studies reported positive changes in oral health knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. There was limited measurement of the acceptability and feasibility of the interventions, with only one study reporting positive feedback from clinicians. There was no evidence to support changes in clinical practice following any of the included interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Existing evidence indicates interventions for stroke clinicians have some potential for building stroke clinicians' capacity to provide adequate oral healthcare. There is however no evidence linking these interventions to optimised patient outcomes. There is a need for research focused on the implementation and dissemination of tailored oral health educational interventions incorporating clinically meaningful outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications for profession/patient care: </strong>Existing oral healthcare educational interventions appear to have a positive effect on stroke clinicians' oral health knowledge, confidence, and attitudes. Educational interventions in oral healthcare are perceived to be acceptable and feasible; however, further research is needed to design and test the effect of new interventions.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Integrated oral healthcare is particularly important for stroke survivors who are at greater risk of preventable aspiration pneumonia. This scoping review highlights the characteristics of existing educational programs for stroke clinicians, their effectiveness, and gaps in existing evidence. Review findings substantiate the need for future research to enhance existing oral healthcare interventions, to translate knowledge acquired from training into clinical practice, and to capture appropriate measures of effect.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The PRISMA-ScR Checklist.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>This review was registered with the Open Science Framework registry (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4BWVF).</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Characteristics and Effectiveness of Oral Healthcare Education Interventions for Stroke Clinicians: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ajesh George, Lien Lombardo, Shilpi Ajwani, Rochelle Wynne, Paula Sanchez, Ariana Kong, Bhavya Talluri, Scott William, Caleb Ferguson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the characteristics of oral healthcare education interventions for stroke clinicians and the effectiveness of these interventions in improving the oral health knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and practice among acute stroke clinicians.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review, guided by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Original full-text studies reporting educational oral healthcare interventions for stroke clinicians, including but not limited to nurses, were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were extracted and appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklist aligned to the study methodology. Narrative synthesis was used to describe heterogeneous findings.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Key electronic bibliographic databases including CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest, Pubmed, and Scopus, in addition to grey literature, were searched for studies published between 1st January 2000 and 20th January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies conducted in acute inpatient settings were included: two randomised controlled trials, two mixed-methods studies, and one quality improvement project. Most (n = 4) studies developed complex interventions that included education and other components (products, referral pathways, assessment tools), and were delivered either face-to-face or as an online program. Most studies reported positive changes in oral health knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. There was limited measurement of the acceptability and feasibility of the interventions, with only one study reporting positive feedback from clinicians. There was no evidence to support changes in clinical practice following any of the included interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Existing evidence indicates interventions for stroke clinicians have some potential for building stroke clinicians' capacity to provide adequate oral healthcare. There is however no evidence linking these interventions to optimised patient outcomes. There is a need for research focused on the implementation and dissemination of tailored oral health educational interventions incorporating clinically meaningful outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications for profession/patient care: </strong>Existing oral healthcare educational interventions appear to have a positive effect on stroke clinicians' oral health knowledge, confidence, and attitudes. Educational interventions in oral healthcare are perceived to be acceptable and feasible; however, further research is needed to design and test the effect of new interventions.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Integrated oral healthcare is particularly important for stroke survivors who are at greater risk of preventable aspiration pneumonia. This scoping review highlights the characteristics of existing educational programs for stroke clinicians, their effectiveness, and gaps in existing evidence. Review findings substantiate the need for future research to enhance existing oral healthcare interventions, to translate knowledge acquired from training into clinical practice, and to capture appropriate measures of effect.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The PRISMA-ScR Checklist.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>This review was registered with the Open Science Framework registry (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4BWVF).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17795\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨急性脑卒中临床医生口腔健康教育干预措施的特点,以及这些干预措施在提高急性脑卒中临床医生口腔健康知识、态度、信心和实践方面的效果。设计:范围审查,由Arksey和O'Malley(2005)框架指导。方法:报告卒中临床医生(包括但不限于护士)教育口腔保健干预的原始全文研究符合纳入条件。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)核对表对纳入的研究进行提取和评价。叙事综合被用来描述异质的发现。数据来源:检索2000年1月1日至2024年1月20日期间发表的研究,检索主要电子书目数据库包括CINAHL、Cochrane、MEDLINE (Ovid)、ProQuest、Pubmed和Scopus,以及灰色文献。结果:在急性住院环境中进行的五项研究被纳入:两项随机对照试验,两项混合方法研究和一项质量改进项目。大多数(n = 4)研究开发了复杂的干预措施,包括教育和其他组成部分(产品、推荐途径、评估工具),并以面对面或在线课程的形式提供。大多数研究报告了口腔健康知识、态度和信心的积极变化。干预措施的可接受性和可行性测量有限,只有一项研究报告了临床医生的积极反馈。没有证据支持在任何纳入的干预措施后临床实践的变化。结论:现有证据表明,卒中临床医生的干预措施具有一定的潜力,可以建立卒中临床医生提供足够的口腔保健的能力。然而,没有证据表明这些干预措施与患者的最佳预后有关。有必要进行研究,重点是实施和传播量身定制的口腔健康教育干预措施,并纳入临床有意义的结果。对专业/患者护理的影响:现有的口腔保健教育干预似乎对卒中临床医生的口腔健康知识、信心和态度有积极的影响。口腔保健教育干预被认为是可接受和可行的;然而,需要进一步的研究来设计和测试新的干预措施的效果。影响:综合口腔保健对中风幸存者尤其重要,他们患可预防吸入性肺炎的风险更大。这一范围综述强调了卒中临床医生现有教育项目的特点、有效性和现有证据的差距。回顾结果证实了未来研究的必要性,以加强现有的口腔保健干预措施,将从培训中获得的知识转化为临床实践,并获得适当的效果衡量标准。报告方法:PRISMA-ScR核对表。方案注册:本综述已在开放科学框架注册中心(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4BWVF)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Characteristics and Effectiveness of Oral Healthcare Education Interventions for Stroke Clinicians: A Scoping Review.

Aims: To explore the characteristics of oral healthcare education interventions for stroke clinicians and the effectiveness of these interventions in improving the oral health knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and practice among acute stroke clinicians.

Design: Scoping review, guided by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework.

Methods: Original full-text studies reporting educational oral healthcare interventions for stroke clinicians, including but not limited to nurses, were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were extracted and appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklist aligned to the study methodology. Narrative synthesis was used to describe heterogeneous findings.

Data sources: Key electronic bibliographic databases including CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest, Pubmed, and Scopus, in addition to grey literature, were searched for studies published between 1st January 2000 and 20th January 2024.

Results: Five studies conducted in acute inpatient settings were included: two randomised controlled trials, two mixed-methods studies, and one quality improvement project. Most (n = 4) studies developed complex interventions that included education and other components (products, referral pathways, assessment tools), and were delivered either face-to-face or as an online program. Most studies reported positive changes in oral health knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. There was limited measurement of the acceptability and feasibility of the interventions, with only one study reporting positive feedback from clinicians. There was no evidence to support changes in clinical practice following any of the included interventions.

Conclusion: Existing evidence indicates interventions for stroke clinicians have some potential for building stroke clinicians' capacity to provide adequate oral healthcare. There is however no evidence linking these interventions to optimised patient outcomes. There is a need for research focused on the implementation and dissemination of tailored oral health educational interventions incorporating clinically meaningful outcomes.

Implications for profession/patient care: Existing oral healthcare educational interventions appear to have a positive effect on stroke clinicians' oral health knowledge, confidence, and attitudes. Educational interventions in oral healthcare are perceived to be acceptable and feasible; however, further research is needed to design and test the effect of new interventions.

Impact: Integrated oral healthcare is particularly important for stroke survivors who are at greater risk of preventable aspiration pneumonia. This scoping review highlights the characteristics of existing educational programs for stroke clinicians, their effectiveness, and gaps in existing evidence. Review findings substantiate the need for future research to enhance existing oral healthcare interventions, to translate knowledge acquired from training into clinical practice, and to capture appropriate measures of effect.

Reporting method: The PRISMA-ScR Checklist.

Protocol registration: This review was registered with the Open Science Framework registry (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4BWVF).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信