{"title":"腹主动脉瘤血管内修复后囊预充预防II型内漏的临床研究。","authors":"Jia-Xin Wang, Zong-Wei Liu, Jian-Tao Zhang, Heng-Hao Zhu, Xin-Yuan Jiao, Jia-Yin Guo, Jia-Xue Bi, Xiang-Chen Dai","doi":"10.1177/15266028251335771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of sac prefilling (SP) with fibrin glue and/or a coil to prevent type II endoleaks (T2ELs) after endovascular aneurysm repair. The main outcome measure was prevalence of incidence of T2ELs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, this is a retrospective observational study on patients treated in our institution. Patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair between January 2017 and July 2022 were included and divided into the endovascular aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair with SP groups. Additionally, all patients were divided into high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) groups based on their risk for T2ELs. The prevalence of incidence of T2ELs at 1 year postoperatively was the main effectiveness index, and the colorectal ischemia complication rate was the main safety index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 431 patients were included in this clinical study. The endovascular aneurysm repair group and SP group comprised 383 patients and 48 patients, respectively. No statistically significant differences between these groups were observed. The HR group included 282 patients; 246 of these patients were in the HR endovascular aneurysm repair group, and 36 were in the HR SP group. The prevalence of incidence of T2ELs in the endovascular aneurysm repair group was higher than that of the SP group at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (15.4% vs 2.8% and 13.2% vs 0%); statistically significant differences between these groups were observed (p = 0.039 and p = 0.032). The postoperative follow-up period was 60 months. A Kaplan-Meier curve analysis indicated that the cumulative T2EL incidence rate of the endovascular aneurysm repair group was significantly higher than that of the SP group (p = 0.011). The LR group included a total of 149 patients; 137 of these patients were in the endovascular aneurysm repair group, and 12 were in the SP group. No statistically significant differences between these groups were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm who are at HR for T2ELs, SP could effectively, and safely prevent postoperative T2ELs.Clinical ImpactThis study points out that in patients with AAA, the sac prefilling technique is more suitable for patients with high-risk factors, so the operator should evaluate the patient's anatomical condition more thoroughly before EVAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251335771"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Study of the Results of Sac Prefilling Performed to Prevent Type II Endoleaks After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Jia-Xin Wang, Zong-Wei Liu, Jian-Tao Zhang, Heng-Hao Zhu, Xin-Yuan Jiao, Jia-Yin Guo, Jia-Xue Bi, Xiang-Chen Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15266028251335771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of sac prefilling (SP) with fibrin glue and/or a coil to prevent type II endoleaks (T2ELs) after endovascular aneurysm repair. The main outcome measure was prevalence of incidence of T2ELs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, this is a retrospective observational study on patients treated in our institution. Patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair between January 2017 and July 2022 were included and divided into the endovascular aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair with SP groups. Additionally, all patients were divided into high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) groups based on their risk for T2ELs. The prevalence of incidence of T2ELs at 1 year postoperatively was the main effectiveness index, and the colorectal ischemia complication rate was the main safety index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 431 patients were included in this clinical study. The endovascular aneurysm repair group and SP group comprised 383 patients and 48 patients, respectively. No statistically significant differences between these groups were observed. The HR group included 282 patients; 246 of these patients were in the HR endovascular aneurysm repair group, and 36 were in the HR SP group. The prevalence of incidence of T2ELs in the endovascular aneurysm repair group was higher than that of the SP group at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (15.4% vs 2.8% and 13.2% vs 0%); statistically significant differences between these groups were observed (p = 0.039 and p = 0.032). The postoperative follow-up period was 60 months. A Kaplan-Meier curve analysis indicated that the cumulative T2EL incidence rate of the endovascular aneurysm repair group was significantly higher than that of the SP group (p = 0.011). The LR group included a total of 149 patients; 137 of these patients were in the endovascular aneurysm repair group, and 12 were in the SP group. No statistically significant differences between these groups were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm who are at HR for T2ELs, SP could effectively, and safely prevent postoperative T2ELs.Clinical ImpactThis study points out that in patients with AAA, the sac prefilling technique is more suitable for patients with high-risk factors, so the operator should evaluate the patient's anatomical condition more thoroughly before EVAR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15266028251335771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251335771\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251335771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究探讨纤维蛋白胶和/或线圈囊预填充(SP)预防血管内动脉瘤修复后II型内漏(T2ELs)的有效性和安全性。主要结局指标为t2el发病率。方法:首先,对我院收治的患者进行回顾性观察性研究。纳入2017年1月至2022年7月接受血管内动脉瘤修复的患者,分为血管内动脉瘤修复组和血管内动脉瘤联合SP修复组。此外,所有患者根据其t2el风险分为高风险(HR)和低风险(LR)组。术后1年t2el发生率为主要有效性指标,结直肠缺血并发症发生率为主要安全性指标。结果:本临床研究共纳入431例患者。血管内动脉瘤修复组383例,SP组48例。两组间无统计学差异。HR组包括282例患者;其中HR血管内动脉瘤修复组246例,HR SP组36例。术后6个月和12个月,血管内动脉瘤修复组T2ELs患病率高于SP组(15.4% vs 2.8%, 13.2% vs 0%);两组间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.039和p = 0.032)。术后随访60个月。Kaplan-Meier曲线分析显示,血管内动脉瘤修复组T2EL累计发生率显著高于SP组(p = 0.011)。LR组共纳入149例患者;其中血管内动脉瘤修复组137例,SP组12例。两组间无统计学差异。结论:对于处于高危期的腹主动脉瘤患者,SP可以有效、安全地预防术后t2el。本研究指出,在AAA患者中,囊预填充技术更适合有高危因素的患者,因此在EVAR前,术者应更彻底地评估患者的解剖情况。
Clinical Study of the Results of Sac Prefilling Performed to Prevent Type II Endoleaks After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.
Objectives: This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of sac prefilling (SP) with fibrin glue and/or a coil to prevent type II endoleaks (T2ELs) after endovascular aneurysm repair. The main outcome measure was prevalence of incidence of T2ELs.
Methods: First, this is a retrospective observational study on patients treated in our institution. Patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair between January 2017 and July 2022 were included and divided into the endovascular aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair with SP groups. Additionally, all patients were divided into high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) groups based on their risk for T2ELs. The prevalence of incidence of T2ELs at 1 year postoperatively was the main effectiveness index, and the colorectal ischemia complication rate was the main safety index.
Results: A total of 431 patients were included in this clinical study. The endovascular aneurysm repair group and SP group comprised 383 patients and 48 patients, respectively. No statistically significant differences between these groups were observed. The HR group included 282 patients; 246 of these patients were in the HR endovascular aneurysm repair group, and 36 were in the HR SP group. The prevalence of incidence of T2ELs in the endovascular aneurysm repair group was higher than that of the SP group at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (15.4% vs 2.8% and 13.2% vs 0%); statistically significant differences between these groups were observed (p = 0.039 and p = 0.032). The postoperative follow-up period was 60 months. A Kaplan-Meier curve analysis indicated that the cumulative T2EL incidence rate of the endovascular aneurysm repair group was significantly higher than that of the SP group (p = 0.011). The LR group included a total of 149 patients; 137 of these patients were in the endovascular aneurysm repair group, and 12 were in the SP group. No statistically significant differences between these groups were observed.
Conclusions: For patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm who are at HR for T2ELs, SP could effectively, and safely prevent postoperative T2ELs.Clinical ImpactThis study points out that in patients with AAA, the sac prefilling technique is more suitable for patients with high-risk factors, so the operator should evaluate the patient's anatomical condition more thoroughly before EVAR.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.