B E Del Águila-Rodríguez, R E Vargas-Morales, L Nieto-Lucio
{"title":"[单纯钢板与双钢板治疗外伤性耻骨联合移位的疗效]。","authors":"B E Del Águila-Rodríguez, R E Vargas-Morales, L Nieto-Lucio","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>traumatic diastasis of the pubic symphysis (PSD) is an uncommon but disabling injury, associated with implications on morbidity and mortality. Depending on the severity, the treatment can be conservative or surgical, this latter method can be single plate (SP) or double plate (DP) osteosynthesis, with sparse information and without consensus on which of these fixation techniques to use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to determine the functional outcome and post-surgical complications of SP and DP in the treatment of PSD.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>retrospective comparative observational study of a cohort of 40 patients with PSD, divided into two groups of 20 patients each, post-operated with SP (group 1) and DP (group 2) according to the Tile classification. For the functional outcome, we used the Majeed scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the median age is 38 years-old, with a predominance of males in 67.5%. According to each comorbidity, type of fracture, hospital stay, distance of pubic diastasis, operating vacuum and surgical time, there are no significant differences, p > 0.05. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) was present in 60 and 25% of patients with SP and DP, respectively, p < 0.05. There were no differences in functional outcome or post-surgical complications between the two groups, p > 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>fixation with SP and DP are equally effective, both in functional outcome and post-surgical complications in the treatment of PSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":101296,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"39 2","pages":"71-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effectiveness of simple plate and double plates in the treatment of the traumatic diastasis of pubic symphysis].\",\"authors\":\"B E Del Águila-Rodríguez, R E Vargas-Morales, L Nieto-Lucio\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>traumatic diastasis of the pubic symphysis (PSD) is an uncommon but disabling injury, associated with implications on morbidity and mortality. Depending on the severity, the treatment can be conservative or surgical, this latter method can be single plate (SP) or double plate (DP) osteosynthesis, with sparse information and without consensus on which of these fixation techniques to use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to determine the functional outcome and post-surgical complications of SP and DP in the treatment of PSD.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>retrospective comparative observational study of a cohort of 40 patients with PSD, divided into two groups of 20 patients each, post-operated with SP (group 1) and DP (group 2) according to the Tile classification. For the functional outcome, we used the Majeed scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the median age is 38 years-old, with a predominance of males in 67.5%. According to each comorbidity, type of fracture, hospital stay, distance of pubic diastasis, operating vacuum and surgical time, there are no significant differences, p > 0.05. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) was present in 60 and 25% of patients with SP and DP, respectively, p < 0.05. There were no differences in functional outcome or post-surgical complications between the two groups, p > 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>fixation with SP and DP are equally effective, both in functional outcome and post-surgical complications in the treatment of PSD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"volume\":\"39 2\",\"pages\":\"71-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
外伤性耻骨联合分离(PSD)是一种罕见但致残性的损伤,与发病率和死亡率相关。根据严重程度,治疗可采用保守或手术,后一种方法可采用单钢板(SP)或双钢板(DP)植骨,但信息较少,对于使用哪一种固定技术尚无共识。目的:探讨SP和DP治疗PSD的功能结局及术后并发症。材料与方法:对40例PSD患者进行回顾性比较观察研究,将其分为两组,每组20例,术后按Tile分级分别采用SP(1组)和DP(2组)。对于功能结果,我们使用Majeed量表。结果:中位年龄38岁,男性居多,占67.5%。按各合并症、骨折类型、住院时间、耻骨离体距离、手术真空度、手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义,p < 0.05。SP和DP分别有60%和25%的患者存在外伤性脑损伤(TBI), p < 0.05。两组功能结局及术后并发症无差异,p < 0.05。结论:在治疗PSD的功能结局和术后并发症方面,SP和DP固定同样有效。
[Effectiveness of simple plate and double plates in the treatment of the traumatic diastasis of pubic symphysis].
Introduction: traumatic diastasis of the pubic symphysis (PSD) is an uncommon but disabling injury, associated with implications on morbidity and mortality. Depending on the severity, the treatment can be conservative or surgical, this latter method can be single plate (SP) or double plate (DP) osteosynthesis, with sparse information and without consensus on which of these fixation techniques to use.
Objective: to determine the functional outcome and post-surgical complications of SP and DP in the treatment of PSD.
Material and methods: retrospective comparative observational study of a cohort of 40 patients with PSD, divided into two groups of 20 patients each, post-operated with SP (group 1) and DP (group 2) according to the Tile classification. For the functional outcome, we used the Majeed scale.
Results: the median age is 38 years-old, with a predominance of males in 67.5%. According to each comorbidity, type of fracture, hospital stay, distance of pubic diastasis, operating vacuum and surgical time, there are no significant differences, p > 0.05. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) was present in 60 and 25% of patients with SP and DP, respectively, p < 0.05. There were no differences in functional outcome or post-surgical complications between the two groups, p > 0.05.
Conclusions: fixation with SP and DP are equally effective, both in functional outcome and post-surgical complications in the treatment of PSD.