心力衰竭患者护理服务的差距:多次再入院患者的定性研究。

Zara Latif, Tracy T Makuvire, Shelli L Feder, A Reshad Garan, Pablo Quintero Pinzon, Haider J Warraich
{"title":"心力衰竭患者护理服务的差距:多次再入院患者的定性研究。","authors":"Zara Latif, Tracy T Makuvire, Shelli L Feder, A Reshad Garan, Pablo Quintero Pinzon, Haider J Warraich","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite significant advances in the management of patients with heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF), readmission rates remain high.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we sought to understand the experiences and gaps in care delivery among heart failure (HF) patients with multiple readmissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with patients admitted with HF exacerbation and who had a prior admission for HF exacerbation within 1 year of the interview. We analyzed the interview contents using thematic analysis. Additionally, we reviewed the medical charts and collected information regarding patients' disease course and treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 24 patients, 54% had HFrEF, and 46% had HFpEF. Two major themes emerged; the first theme was centered on hospital readmissions, which often uncovered gaps in communication and deficiencies in discharge education. Patients expressed frustration with recurrent admissions, identified communication challenges while inpatient, and highlighted the shortcomings of the current discharge education models. The second theme explored the ways in which fragmented understanding of HF as a result of gaps in effective care delivery impacted multiple domains of care spanning the spectrum from initial diagnosis to prognosis. The interviews highlighted important differences between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with HF and recurrent admissions shared multiple gaps in care delivery with important differences noted between HFpEF and HFrEF patients. These findings can inform the design of future targeted interventions to ensure effective care delivery to a high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaps in care delivery for patients with heart failure: A qualitative study of patients with multiple readmissions.\",\"authors\":\"Zara Latif, Tracy T Makuvire, Shelli L Feder, A Reshad Garan, Pablo Quintero Pinzon, Haider J Warraich\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhm.70051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite significant advances in the management of patients with heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF), readmission rates remain high.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we sought to understand the experiences and gaps in care delivery among heart failure (HF) patients with multiple readmissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with patients admitted with HF exacerbation and who had a prior admission for HF exacerbation within 1 year of the interview. We analyzed the interview contents using thematic analysis. Additionally, we reviewed the medical charts and collected information regarding patients' disease course and treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 24 patients, 54% had HFrEF, and 46% had HFpEF. Two major themes emerged; the first theme was centered on hospital readmissions, which often uncovered gaps in communication and deficiencies in discharge education. Patients expressed frustration with recurrent admissions, identified communication challenges while inpatient, and highlighted the shortcomings of the current discharge education models. The second theme explored the ways in which fragmented understanding of HF as a result of gaps in effective care delivery impacted multiple domains of care spanning the spectrum from initial diagnosis to prognosis. The interviews highlighted important differences between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with HF and recurrent admissions shared multiple gaps in care delivery with important differences noted between HFpEF and HFrEF patients. These findings can inform the design of future targeted interventions to ensure effective care delivery to a high-risk population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管在保留和降低射血分数(HFpEF和HFrEF)心力衰竭患者的管理方面取得了重大进展,但再入院率仍然很高。目的:在本研究中,我们试图了解多次再入院的心力衰竭(HF)患者的护理经验和差距。方法:我们采用半结构化访谈对入院的心衰加重患者进行了定性研究,这些患者在访谈后1年内曾因心衰加重入院。我们采用主题分析法对访谈内容进行分析。此外,我们还查阅了病历,收集了有关患者病程和治疗方法的信息。结果:我们的研究纳入了24例患者,其中54%为HFrEF, 46%为HFpEF。出现了两个主要主题;第一个主题以医院再入院为中心,这往往揭示了沟通方面的差距和出院教育方面的不足。患者表达了对反复入院的沮丧,确定了住院期间的沟通挑战,并强调了当前出院教育模式的缺点。第二个主题探讨了由于有效医疗服务的差距,对心衰的零散认识如何影响从初始诊断到预后的多个医疗领域。访谈强调了HFrEF和HFpEF患者之间的重要差异。结论:HFpEF和HFrEF患者在医疗服务方面存在许多差异,HFpEF和HFrEF患者之间存在重要差异。这些发现可以为未来有针对性的干预措施的设计提供信息,以确保向高危人群提供有效的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gaps in care delivery for patients with heart failure: A qualitative study of patients with multiple readmissions.

Background: Despite significant advances in the management of patients with heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF), readmission rates remain high.

Objectives: In this study, we sought to understand the experiences and gaps in care delivery among heart failure (HF) patients with multiple readmissions.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with patients admitted with HF exacerbation and who had a prior admission for HF exacerbation within 1 year of the interview. We analyzed the interview contents using thematic analysis. Additionally, we reviewed the medical charts and collected information regarding patients' disease course and treatments.

Results: Our study included 24 patients, 54% had HFrEF, and 46% had HFpEF. Two major themes emerged; the first theme was centered on hospital readmissions, which often uncovered gaps in communication and deficiencies in discharge education. Patients expressed frustration with recurrent admissions, identified communication challenges while inpatient, and highlighted the shortcomings of the current discharge education models. The second theme explored the ways in which fragmented understanding of HF as a result of gaps in effective care delivery impacted multiple domains of care spanning the spectrum from initial diagnosis to prognosis. The interviews highlighted important differences between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF.

Conclusions: Patients with HF and recurrent admissions shared multiple gaps in care delivery with important differences noted between HFpEF and HFrEF patients. These findings can inform the design of future targeted interventions to ensure effective care delivery to a high-risk population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信