San Kim, Sehan Park, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Hwan Cho, Dong-Ho Lee
{"title":"评估k线转换对k线阴性后纵韧带颈椎骨化(OPLL)手术结果的预测价值:椎板切除术融合与椎板成形术。","authors":"San Kim, Sehan Park, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Hwan Cho, Dong-Ho Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Laminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty are common treatments for K-line negative cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, the clinical significance of postoperative K-line conversion from negative to positive remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether converting a K-line from negative to positive improves surgical outcomes in patients with cervical OPLL by comparing LF and laminoplasty.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients with cervical myelopathy due to K-line negative OPLL who underwent LF or laminoplasty, with ≥1 year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes included neck and arm pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, neck disability index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, JOA recovery rate, and radiographic parameters (C2-C7 lordosis, modified K-line interval).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared radiographic and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 85 patients with K-line-negative OPLL (39 LF, 46 laminoplasty), postoperative K-line conversion occurred significantly more frequently in the LF group (56.4% vs. 16.8%; p<.001). Although laminoplasty better preserved cervical range of motion and reduced neck pain, LF provided superior neurologic outcomes, as indicated by higher final JOA scores and recovery rates. Patients who achieved K-line conversion had significantly higher rates of favorable clinical outcomes compared to those who did not (58.1% vs. 27.7%; p=.019). Multivariate regression analyses further demonstrated that K-line conversion independently predicted favorable clinical outcomes (odds ratio [OR]: 3.900; p=.023), and LF was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of K-line conversion compared to laminoplasty (OR: 3.683; p=.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with K-line-negative cervical OPLL, postoperative conversion to K-line-positive status is significantly associated with improved neurological outcomes. Although laminoplasty provides advantages regarding neck pain relief and motion preservation, LF more reliably facilitates K-line conversion and suppresses kyphosis, leading to superior clinical outcomes. Careful preoperative evaluation of cervical alignment, combined with surgical strategies aimed at promoting K-line conversion, may optimize surgical results.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the predictive value of K-line conversion in surgical outcomes for K-line negative cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL): laminectomy with fusion versus laminoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"San Kim, Sehan Park, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Hwan Cho, Dong-Ho Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Laminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty are common treatments for K-line negative cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, the clinical significance of postoperative K-line conversion from negative to positive remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether converting a K-line from negative to positive improves surgical outcomes in patients with cervical OPLL by comparing LF and laminoplasty.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients with cervical myelopathy due to K-line negative OPLL who underwent LF or laminoplasty, with ≥1 year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes included neck and arm pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, neck disability index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, JOA recovery rate, and radiographic parameters (C2-C7 lordosis, modified K-line interval).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared radiographic and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 85 patients with K-line-negative OPLL (39 LF, 46 laminoplasty), postoperative K-line conversion occurred significantly more frequently in the LF group (56.4% vs. 16.8%; p<.001). Although laminoplasty better preserved cervical range of motion and reduced neck pain, LF provided superior neurologic outcomes, as indicated by higher final JOA scores and recovery rates. Patients who achieved K-line conversion had significantly higher rates of favorable clinical outcomes compared to those who did not (58.1% vs. 27.7%; p=.019). Multivariate regression analyses further demonstrated that K-line conversion independently predicted favorable clinical outcomes (odds ratio [OR]: 3.900; p=.023), and LF was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of K-line conversion compared to laminoplasty (OR: 3.683; p=.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with K-line-negative cervical OPLL, postoperative conversion to K-line-positive status is significantly associated with improved neurological outcomes. Although laminoplasty provides advantages regarding neck pain relief and motion preservation, LF more reliably facilitates K-line conversion and suppresses kyphosis, leading to superior clinical outcomes. Careful preoperative evaluation of cervical alignment, combined with surgical strategies aimed at promoting K-line conversion, may optimize surgical results.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.015\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:椎板切除术融合(LF)和椎板成形术是治疗k线阴性后纵韧带颈椎骨化(OPLL)的常用方法。然而,术后k线由阴性转为阳性的临床意义尚不清楚。目的:通过比较LF和椎板成形术,确定k线由阴性转为阳性是否能改善颈椎OPLL患者的手术效果。研究设计/设置:回顾性队列研究。患者样本:接受LF或椎板成形术的k线阴性OPLL所致颈脊髓病患者,随访≥1年。结果测量:主要结果包括颈部和手臂疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、颈部残疾指数(NDI)、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、JOA恢复率和影像学参数(C2-C7前伸、改良k线间隔)。方法:比较两组患者的影像学和临床结果。结果:在85例k线阴性OPLL患者(39例LF, 46例椎板成形术)中,LF组术后k线转换发生率明显更高(56.4% vs. 16.8%;结论:在k线阴性的颈椎OPLL患者中,术后转化为k线阳性状态与神经预后的改善显著相关。尽管椎板成形术在缓解颈部疼痛和保持运动方面具有优势,但LF更可靠地促进k线转换和抑制后凸,从而获得更好的临床结果。术前仔细评估颈椎对中,结合旨在促进k线转换的手术策略,可以优化手术效果。证据水平:III。
Evaluating the predictive value of K-line conversion in surgical outcomes for K-line negative cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL): laminectomy with fusion versus laminoplasty.
Background context: Laminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty are common treatments for K-line negative cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). However, the clinical significance of postoperative K-line conversion from negative to positive remains unclear.
Purpose: To determine whether converting a K-line from negative to positive improves surgical outcomes in patients with cervical OPLL by comparing LF and laminoplasty.
Study design/setting: Retrospective cohort study.
Patient sample: Patients with cervical myelopathy due to K-line negative OPLL who underwent LF or laminoplasty, with ≥1 year of follow-up.
Outcome measures: Primary outcomes included neck and arm pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, neck disability index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, JOA recovery rate, and radiographic parameters (C2-C7 lordosis, modified K-line interval).
Methods: We compared radiographic and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups.
Results: Among 85 patients with K-line-negative OPLL (39 LF, 46 laminoplasty), postoperative K-line conversion occurred significantly more frequently in the LF group (56.4% vs. 16.8%; p<.001). Although laminoplasty better preserved cervical range of motion and reduced neck pain, LF provided superior neurologic outcomes, as indicated by higher final JOA scores and recovery rates. Patients who achieved K-line conversion had significantly higher rates of favorable clinical outcomes compared to those who did not (58.1% vs. 27.7%; p=.019). Multivariate regression analyses further demonstrated that K-line conversion independently predicted favorable clinical outcomes (odds ratio [OR]: 3.900; p=.023), and LF was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of K-line conversion compared to laminoplasty (OR: 3.683; p=.033).
Conclusion: In patients with K-line-negative cervical OPLL, postoperative conversion to K-line-positive status is significantly associated with improved neurological outcomes. Although laminoplasty provides advantages regarding neck pain relief and motion preservation, LF more reliably facilitates K-line conversion and suppresses kyphosis, leading to superior clinical outcomes. Careful preoperative evaluation of cervical alignment, combined with surgical strategies aimed at promoting K-line conversion, may optimize surgical results.
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.