开展国际多地点临床试验的考虑。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Laura Beth Kalvas, Mallory A Perry-Eaddy, Amy Cassidy, Onella S Dawkins-Henry, Laurie Lee, Lisa A Asaro, David Wypij, Martha A Q Curley
{"title":"开展国际多地点临床试验的考虑。","authors":"Laura Beth Kalvas, Mallory A Perry-Eaddy, Amy Cassidy, Onella S Dawkins-Henry, Laurie Lee, Lisa A Asaro, David Wypij, Martha A Q Curley","doi":"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Background: Adequately powered randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) provide the highest level of evidence to support nursing interventions that are thought to improve clinical outcomes. To ensure adequate power, recruitment at multiple study sites is often required. Complexity is exponentiated when RCTs are conducted in multiple settings, especially on an international level. Regardless of logistical challenges, funders typically expect subjects to be enrolled within the first year of funding.Objective: To describe essential elements that must be considered when launching a multisite RCT.Methods: Step-by-step review of essential multisite RCT start-up activities using PROSpect, a nurse-led 50+ site international pediatric critical care RCT, as an exemplar. Essential pre- and post-award activities and organizational structure are discussed. The PROSpect launch timeline, with comparisons between United States (U.S.) and international study site initiation, is presented.Results: In the first two years of PROSpect funding (6/15/18-6/14/20), 54 sites in 13 countries spanning five continents initiated study launch activities and subsequently went on to begin subject screening. Of these, 15 sites (28%) began screening within the first funding year and 29 (54%) within the second year. PROSpect enrolled its first subject prior to the end of the first year of funding. Sites completed launch activities within a median of 295 days of receiving an instructional email delineating study launch steps (IQR: 202, 379; range = 151-1,046). International sites (n = 19) required more time to launch than U.S. sites (n = 35; 448 [360, 785] vs 219 [201, 299] days; p < .001).Discussion: Nurses must provide care that is supported by the best available evidence. Multisite RCTs are complex but provide high-quality evidence and can be managed with prospective systematic organization. In PROSpect, international sites took approximately twice as long to activate as U.S. sites. When developing a study start-up timeline, it is important to adjust milestones to accommodate the complexities of launching international sites and maintain momentum throughout the process, as start-up delays can increase risk of trial failure. This paper contributes to recent efforts to demystify and streamline the multisite RCT start-up process for nurse investigators transitioning from conducting single-site to multisite trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":49723,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations in Launching an International Multisite Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Beth Kalvas, Mallory A Perry-Eaddy, Amy Cassidy, Onella S Dawkins-Henry, Laurie Lee, Lisa A Asaro, David Wypij, Martha A Q Curley\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNR.0000000000000826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Background: Adequately powered randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) provide the highest level of evidence to support nursing interventions that are thought to improve clinical outcomes. To ensure adequate power, recruitment at multiple study sites is often required. Complexity is exponentiated when RCTs are conducted in multiple settings, especially on an international level. Regardless of logistical challenges, funders typically expect subjects to be enrolled within the first year of funding.Objective: To describe essential elements that must be considered when launching a multisite RCT.Methods: Step-by-step review of essential multisite RCT start-up activities using PROSpect, a nurse-led 50+ site international pediatric critical care RCT, as an exemplar. Essential pre- and post-award activities and organizational structure are discussed. The PROSpect launch timeline, with comparisons between United States (U.S.) and international study site initiation, is presented.Results: In the first two years of PROSpect funding (6/15/18-6/14/20), 54 sites in 13 countries spanning five continents initiated study launch activities and subsequently went on to begin subject screening. Of these, 15 sites (28%) began screening within the first funding year and 29 (54%) within the second year. PROSpect enrolled its first subject prior to the end of the first year of funding. Sites completed launch activities within a median of 295 days of receiving an instructional email delineating study launch steps (IQR: 202, 379; range = 151-1,046). International sites (n = 19) required more time to launch than U.S. sites (n = 35; 448 [360, 785] vs 219 [201, 299] days; p < .001).Discussion: Nurses must provide care that is supported by the best available evidence. Multisite RCTs are complex but provide high-quality evidence and can be managed with prospective systematic organization. In PROSpect, international sites took approximately twice as long to activate as U.S. sites. When developing a study start-up timeline, it is important to adjust milestones to accommodate the complexities of launching international sites and maintain momentum throughout the process, as start-up delays can increase risk of trial failure. This paper contributes to recent efforts to demystify and streamline the multisite RCT start-up process for nurse investigators transitioning from conducting single-site to multisite trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000826\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:背景:充分支持的随机对照临床试验(RCTs)为护理干预提供了最高水平的证据,这些证据被认为可以改善临床结果。为了确保足够的权力,通常需要在多个研究地点进行招聘。当随机对照试验在多种环境下进行时,特别是在国际层面上进行时,复杂性成倍增加。无论后勤方面的挑战如何,资助者通常希望受试者在资助的第一年内注册。目的:描述开展多位点随机对照试验时必须考虑的基本要素。方法:以PROSpect为例,逐步回顾基本的多站点RCT启动活动,PROSpect是一项由护士主导的50+站点国际儿科危重症RCT。讨论了基本的奖前和奖后活动和组织结构。展望发射时间表,并比较了美国(美国)和国际研究站点启动。结果:在PROSpect资助的前两年(6月15日-6月14日- 20年),横跨五大洲13个国家的54个站点启动了研究启动活动,随后开始了受试者筛选。其中,15家(28%)在第一个资助年度开始筛查,29家(54%)在第二年开始筛查。PROSpect在第一年资助结束前招募了第一位受试者。站点在收到描述研究启动步骤的指导性电子邮件后的295天内完成启动活动(IQR: 202,379;范围= 151- 1046)。国际网站(n = 19)比美国网站(n = 35)需要更多的时间;448日[360,785]vs . 219日[201,299];P < 0.001)。讨论:护士必须提供有最佳证据支持的护理。多地点随机对照试验是复杂的,但提供了高质量的证据,可以通过前瞻性的系统组织进行管理。在PROSpect中,国际网站的激活时间大约是美国网站的两倍。在制定研究启动时间表时,重要的是要调整里程碑,以适应启动国际站点的复杂性,并在整个过程中保持势头,因为启动延迟会增加试验失败的风险。本文有助于最近的努力去神秘化和简化多地点随机对照试验的启动过程,为护士调查员从进行单地点到多地点的试验过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considerations in Launching an International Multisite Clinical Trial.

Abstract: Background: Adequately powered randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) provide the highest level of evidence to support nursing interventions that are thought to improve clinical outcomes. To ensure adequate power, recruitment at multiple study sites is often required. Complexity is exponentiated when RCTs are conducted in multiple settings, especially on an international level. Regardless of logistical challenges, funders typically expect subjects to be enrolled within the first year of funding.Objective: To describe essential elements that must be considered when launching a multisite RCT.Methods: Step-by-step review of essential multisite RCT start-up activities using PROSpect, a nurse-led 50+ site international pediatric critical care RCT, as an exemplar. Essential pre- and post-award activities and organizational structure are discussed. The PROSpect launch timeline, with comparisons between United States (U.S.) and international study site initiation, is presented.Results: In the first two years of PROSpect funding (6/15/18-6/14/20), 54 sites in 13 countries spanning five continents initiated study launch activities and subsequently went on to begin subject screening. Of these, 15 sites (28%) began screening within the first funding year and 29 (54%) within the second year. PROSpect enrolled its first subject prior to the end of the first year of funding. Sites completed launch activities within a median of 295 days of receiving an instructional email delineating study launch steps (IQR: 202, 379; range = 151-1,046). International sites (n = 19) required more time to launch than U.S. sites (n = 35; 448 [360, 785] vs 219 [201, 299] days; p < .001).Discussion: Nurses must provide care that is supported by the best available evidence. Multisite RCTs are complex but provide high-quality evidence and can be managed with prospective systematic organization. In PROSpect, international sites took approximately twice as long to activate as U.S. sites. When developing a study start-up timeline, it is important to adjust milestones to accommodate the complexities of launching international sites and maintain momentum throughout the process, as start-up delays can increase risk of trial failure. This paper contributes to recent efforts to demystify and streamline the multisite RCT start-up process for nurse investigators transitioning from conducting single-site to multisite trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Research
Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Research is a peer-reviewed journal celebrating over 60 years as the most sought-after nursing resource; it offers more depth, more detail, and more of what today''s nurses demand. Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies. Each issue highlights the latest research techniques, quantitative and qualitative studies, and new state-of-the-art methodological strategies, including information not yet found in textbooks. Expert commentaries and briefs are also included. In addition to 6 issues per year, Nursing Research from time to time publishes supplemental content not found anywhere else.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信