Shweta Kamat, Britny R Brown, Steven A Cohen, Ami Vyas
{"title":"浸润性乳腺癌患者预防性使用神经激肽-1受体拮抗剂前后的明智选择","authors":"Shweta Kamat, Britny R Brown, Steven A Cohen, Ami Vyas","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the impact of Choosing Wisely (CW) on prophylactic NK1-RA use among women with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study conducted using administrative claims data. The exposure variable was the start of chemotherapy relative to the implementation date for the CW antiemetic measure. The outcome was prophylactic NK1-RA use. Interrupted time series using segmented regression was used to assess the effect of CW on prophylactic NK1-RA use.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (2010-2018) was used. This study included women aged ≥ 18 years with breast cancer with at least one newly initiated claim for low/minimal/moderate emetic risk chemotherapy (n = 25,549).</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The prophylactic use of NK1-RAs among patients with breast cancer receiving low/minimal/moderate emetic risk chemotherapy decreased from 11.1% pre-CW to 7.7% post-CW. Segmented regression analysis showed a significant increase of 0.11 per 100 patients per quarter in the use of prophylactic NK1-RAs prior to CW recommendation (95% CI = 0.10-0.12; p < 0.0001). However, immediately after the CW (occurred in Q4 2013), there was a significant decline in the prophylactic NK1-RA use by 1.03 per 100 patients in Q2 2014 (-0.93 to -1.13; p < 0.0001). For the time after intervention, there was a significant decline in NK1-RA use by 0.37 per 100 patients per quarter in the post-CW period compared to the pre-CW period (95% CI = -0.36 to -0.38; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights a significant but modest decline in the use of prophylactic NK1-RAs. Educational efforts for the dissemination of CW recommendations are needed to facilitate appropriate prophylactic NK1-RAs use.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14626"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist Use Pre- and Post-Choosing Wisely Initiative Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Shweta Kamat, Britny R Brown, Steven A Cohen, Ami Vyas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.14626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the impact of Choosing Wisely (CW) on prophylactic NK1-RA use among women with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study conducted using administrative claims data. The exposure variable was the start of chemotherapy relative to the implementation date for the CW antiemetic measure. The outcome was prophylactic NK1-RA use. Interrupted time series using segmented regression was used to assess the effect of CW on prophylactic NK1-RA use.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (2010-2018) was used. This study included women aged ≥ 18 years with breast cancer with at least one newly initiated claim for low/minimal/moderate emetic risk chemotherapy (n = 25,549).</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The prophylactic use of NK1-RAs among patients with breast cancer receiving low/minimal/moderate emetic risk chemotherapy decreased from 11.1% pre-CW to 7.7% post-CW. Segmented regression analysis showed a significant increase of 0.11 per 100 patients per quarter in the use of prophylactic NK1-RAs prior to CW recommendation (95% CI = 0.10-0.12; p < 0.0001). However, immediately after the CW (occurred in Q4 2013), there was a significant decline in the prophylactic NK1-RA use by 1.03 per 100 patients in Q2 2014 (-0.93 to -1.13; p < 0.0001). For the time after intervention, there was a significant decline in NK1-RA use by 0.37 per 100 patients per quarter in the post-CW period compared to the pre-CW period (95% CI = -0.36 to -0.38; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights a significant but modest decline in the use of prophylactic NK1-RAs. Educational efforts for the dissemination of CW recommendations are needed to facilitate appropriate prophylactic NK1-RAs use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14626\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨明智选择(CW)对乳腺癌妇女预防性使用NK1-RA的影响。研究设置和设计:这是一项使用行政索赔数据进行的回顾性队列研究。暴露变量是相对于CW止吐措施实施日期的化疗开始时间。结果是预防性使用NK1-RA。使用分段回归的中断时间序列来评估CW对预防性使用NK1-RA的影响。数据来源和分析样本:使用Optum的去识别临床信息学数据集市数据库(2010-2018)。该研究纳入了年龄≥18岁的乳腺癌女性,至少有一个新申请的低/最低/中度呕吐风险化疗(n = 25,549)。主要发现:在接受低/轻微/中度呕吐风险化疗的乳腺癌患者中,预防性使用NK1-RAs的比例从连续化疗前的11.1%降至连续化疗后的7.7%。分段回归分析显示,在CW推荐之前,预防性NK1-RAs的使用每季度显著增加0.11 / 100例患者(95% CI = 0.10-0.12;结论:本研究强调了预防性NK1-RAs使用显著但适度的下降。需要开展教育工作,传播化学武器建议,以促进适当的预防性使用NK1-RAs。
Prophylactic Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist Use Pre- and Post-Choosing Wisely Initiative Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer.
Objective: To examine the impact of Choosing Wisely (CW) on prophylactic NK1-RA use among women with breast cancer.
Study setting and design: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted using administrative claims data. The exposure variable was the start of chemotherapy relative to the implementation date for the CW antiemetic measure. The outcome was prophylactic NK1-RA use. Interrupted time series using segmented regression was used to assess the effect of CW on prophylactic NK1-RA use.
Data sources and analytic sample: Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (2010-2018) was used. This study included women aged ≥ 18 years with breast cancer with at least one newly initiated claim for low/minimal/moderate emetic risk chemotherapy (n = 25,549).
Principal findings: The prophylactic use of NK1-RAs among patients with breast cancer receiving low/minimal/moderate emetic risk chemotherapy decreased from 11.1% pre-CW to 7.7% post-CW. Segmented regression analysis showed a significant increase of 0.11 per 100 patients per quarter in the use of prophylactic NK1-RAs prior to CW recommendation (95% CI = 0.10-0.12; p < 0.0001). However, immediately after the CW (occurred in Q4 2013), there was a significant decline in the prophylactic NK1-RA use by 1.03 per 100 patients in Q2 2014 (-0.93 to -1.13; p < 0.0001). For the time after intervention, there was a significant decline in NK1-RA use by 0.37 per 100 patients per quarter in the post-CW period compared to the pre-CW period (95% CI = -0.36 to -0.38; p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: This study highlights a significant but modest decline in the use of prophylactic NK1-RAs. Educational efforts for the dissemination of CW recommendations are needed to facilitate appropriate prophylactic NK1-RAs use.
期刊介绍:
Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.