脊髓损伤患者使用经颅直流电刺激联合运动进行远程康复:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Thanwarat Chantanachai, Irin Apiworajirawit, Pipat Klamruen, Benchaporn Aneksan, Paradee Auvichayapat, Alexandra Lackmy-Vallée, Wanalee Klomjai
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者使用经颅直流电刺激联合运动进行远程康复:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Thanwarat Chantanachai, Irin Apiworajirawit, Pipat Klamruen, Benchaporn Aneksan, Paradee Auvichayapat, Alexandra Lackmy-Vallée, Wanalee Klomjai","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v57.42353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the effects of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise on motor and sensory function, spasticity, functional and transfer performance, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Thirty individuals with SCI were allocated to receive either active transcranial direct current stimulation or sham transcranial direct current stimulation, followed by the same tele-rehabilitation programme, for 12 sessions over 4 weeks (3 sessions/week). Each session included 20 min of transcranial direct current stimulation followed by 1 h of tele-supervised exercise. Primary outcome was the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI). Secondary outcomes included (i) the upper limb muscle strength evaluated by hand-held dynamometer, (ii) spasticity evaluated by H reflex and modified-Modified Ashworth Scale, (iii) functional performance assessed by the spinal cord independence measure III, (iv) transfer performance assessed by the transfer assessment instrument, and (v) quality of life assessed by WHOQOL-BREF. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-way mixed ANOVA revealed an interaction effects between group and time (F(1,18)=4.49, p=0.043) and main effects of time (F(1,18)=7.82, p=0.009). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed a significant improvement only within the active group at 1-month follow-up (p=0.002) for the upper extremity motor scores (UEMS). No significant differences were observed for any of the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of 12 sessions of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise was limited to improved upper limb motor recovery, with after-effect at 1-month post-intervention as compared with exercise alone. No improvements were found in sensory function, spasticity, functional and transfer performance, and quality of life. However, this intervention appeared to be feasible, safe, and well-adhered to and provides insight into the use of transcranial direct current stimulation as a tool for tele-rehabilitation in a spinal cord injury outpatient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"57 ","pages":"jrm42353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tele-rehabilitation using transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise in people with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Thanwarat Chantanachai, Irin Apiworajirawit, Pipat Klamruen, Benchaporn Aneksan, Paradee Auvichayapat, Alexandra Lackmy-Vallée, Wanalee Klomjai\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/jrm.v57.42353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the effects of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise on motor and sensory function, spasticity, functional and transfer performance, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Thirty individuals with SCI were allocated to receive either active transcranial direct current stimulation or sham transcranial direct current stimulation, followed by the same tele-rehabilitation programme, for 12 sessions over 4 weeks (3 sessions/week). Each session included 20 min of transcranial direct current stimulation followed by 1 h of tele-supervised exercise. Primary outcome was the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI). Secondary outcomes included (i) the upper limb muscle strength evaluated by hand-held dynamometer, (ii) spasticity evaluated by H reflex and modified-Modified Ashworth Scale, (iii) functional performance assessed by the spinal cord independence measure III, (iv) transfer performance assessed by the transfer assessment instrument, and (v) quality of life assessed by WHOQOL-BREF. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-way mixed ANOVA revealed an interaction effects between group and time (F(1,18)=4.49, p=0.043) and main effects of time (F(1,18)=7.82, p=0.009). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed a significant improvement only within the active group at 1-month follow-up (p=0.002) for the upper extremity motor scores (UEMS). No significant differences were observed for any of the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of 12 sessions of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise was limited to improved upper limb motor recovery, with after-effect at 1-month post-intervention as compared with exercise alone. No improvements were found in sensory function, spasticity, functional and transfer performance, and quality of life. However, this intervention appeared to be feasible, safe, and well-adhered to and provides insight into the use of transcranial direct current stimulation as a tool for tele-rehabilitation in a spinal cord injury outpatient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"jrm42353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067987/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.42353\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.42353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨家庭经颅直流电刺激联合运动对运动和感觉功能、痉挛、功能和传递性能以及生活质量的影响。设计:前瞻性、双盲、随机、假对照试验。研究对象和方法:30例脊髓损伤患者分别接受主动经颅直流电刺激和假经颅直流电刺激,随后进行相同的远程康复计划,为期4周(3次/周),共12次。每组包括20分钟的经颅直流电刺激和1小时的远程监督运动。主要终点是国际脊髓损伤神经学分类标准(ISNCSCI)。次要结果包括(i)手持式测力仪评估的上肢肌力,(ii) H反射和改良Ashworth量表评估的痉挛,(iii)脊髓独立性测量评估的功能表现,(iv)转移评估仪评估的转移表现,(v) WHOQOL-BREF评估的生活质量。在基线、干预后和1个月随访时评估结果。结果:双因素混合方差分析显示,组与时间之间存在交互作用(F(1,18)=4.49, p=0.043),主要影响因素为时间(F(1,18)=7.82, p=0.009)。Bonferroni事后分析显示,在1个月的随访中,上肢运动评分(UEMS)仅在活动组有显著改善(p=0.002)。在任何次要结果中均未观察到显著差异。结论:12次家庭经颅直流电刺激联合运动的效果仅限于改善上肢运动恢复,干预后1个月的效果与单独运动相比。感觉功能、痉挛、功能和转移表现以及生活质量均未见改善。然而,这种干预似乎是可行的,安全的,并且坚持得很好,并且为经颅直流电刺激作为脊髓损伤门诊人群远程康复的工具提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tele-rehabilitation using transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise in people with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: This study explored the effects of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise on motor and sensory function, spasticity, functional and transfer performance, and quality of life.

Design: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Subjects and methods: Thirty individuals with SCI were allocated to receive either active transcranial direct current stimulation or sham transcranial direct current stimulation, followed by the same tele-rehabilitation programme, for 12 sessions over 4 weeks (3 sessions/week). Each session included 20 min of transcranial direct current stimulation followed by 1 h of tele-supervised exercise. Primary outcome was the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI). Secondary outcomes included (i) the upper limb muscle strength evaluated by hand-held dynamometer, (ii) spasticity evaluated by H reflex and modified-Modified Ashworth Scale, (iii) functional performance assessed by the spinal cord independence measure III, (iv) transfer performance assessed by the transfer assessment instrument, and (v) quality of life assessed by WHOQOL-BREF. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.

Results: Two-way mixed ANOVA revealed an interaction effects between group and time (F(1,18)=4.49, p=0.043) and main effects of time (F(1,18)=7.82, p=0.009). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed a significant improvement only within the active group at 1-month follow-up (p=0.002) for the upper extremity motor scores (UEMS). No significant differences were observed for any of the secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: The effect of 12 sessions of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise was limited to improved upper limb motor recovery, with after-effect at 1-month post-intervention as compared with exercise alone. No improvements were found in sensory function, spasticity, functional and transfer performance, and quality of life. However, this intervention appeared to be feasible, safe, and well-adhered to and provides insight into the use of transcranial direct current stimulation as a tool for tele-rehabilitation in a spinal cord injury outpatient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信