多学科团队在医生糖尿病和合并症管理中的获益和障碍:一项定性双中心研究。

Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26335565251336425
Jonas D Andersen, Stine J Bugge, Mette J Rothmann, Sisse H Laursen, Stine Hangaard
{"title":"多学科团队在医生糖尿病和合并症管理中的获益和障碍:一项定性双中心研究。","authors":"Jonas D Andersen, Stine J Bugge, Mette J Rothmann, Sisse H Laursen, Stine Hangaard","doi":"10.1177/26335565251336425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The dynamics of working within multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) to manage diabetes and comorbidities remain underexplored. Investigating physicians' experiences provide insights into the benefits and challenges of MDTs in this complex context, paving the way for improving current practices and shaping future interventions to better address the needs of this patient population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore perceived benefits and barriers of MDTs in the management of people with diabetes and comorbidities among physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven semi-structured interviews (duration 26-38 min) were conducted online among physicians. Criterion sampling of physicians from relevant medical specialties and with experience from MDTs were included. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) benefits of MDT, (2) challenges related to MDT, (3) the need for MDTs and cross-sectorial work, and (4) prerequisites for successful MDTs. Improved professional learning and relationships, enhanced capacity leverage, and optimized treatment were some of the major benefits. Siloed healthcare systems and cultures and resource demanding MDTs were considered barriers. Composition and outline of the MDTs, including the role of general practitioners (GPs), were considered important aspects of MDTs. The increase in multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and complexity in patient pathways necessitates MDTs and cross-sectorial work.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate several benefits and barriers of MDTs. MDTs and cross-sectorial work are needed prospectively in healthcare and hold the potential to embrace some of the challenges encountered by people with diabetes and comorbidities. Understanding and incorporating experiences of physicians could inform future improvements in care management.</p>","PeriodicalId":73843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","volume":"15 ","pages":"26335565251336425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived benefits and barriers of multidisciplinary teams in the management of diabetes and comorbidities among physicians: A qualitative double-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Jonas D Andersen, Stine J Bugge, Mette J Rothmann, Sisse H Laursen, Stine Hangaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26335565251336425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The dynamics of working within multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) to manage diabetes and comorbidities remain underexplored. Investigating physicians' experiences provide insights into the benefits and challenges of MDTs in this complex context, paving the way for improving current practices and shaping future interventions to better address the needs of this patient population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore perceived benefits and barriers of MDTs in the management of people with diabetes and comorbidities among physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven semi-structured interviews (duration 26-38 min) were conducted online among physicians. Criterion sampling of physicians from relevant medical specialties and with experience from MDTs were included. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) benefits of MDT, (2) challenges related to MDT, (3) the need for MDTs and cross-sectorial work, and (4) prerequisites for successful MDTs. Improved professional learning and relationships, enhanced capacity leverage, and optimized treatment were some of the major benefits. Siloed healthcare systems and cultures and resource demanding MDTs were considered barriers. Composition and outline of the MDTs, including the role of general practitioners (GPs), were considered important aspects of MDTs. The increase in multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and complexity in patient pathways necessitates MDTs and cross-sectorial work.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate several benefits and barriers of MDTs. MDTs and cross-sectorial work are needed prospectively in healthcare and hold the potential to embrace some of the challenges encountered by people with diabetes and comorbidities. Understanding and incorporating experiences of physicians could inform future improvements in care management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"26335565251336425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035121/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251336425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251336425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在多学科团队(MDTs)中管理糖尿病和合并症的动态工作仍未得到充分探索。通过调查医生的经验,可以深入了解在这种复杂背景下联合治疗的益处和挑战,为改进当前实践和塑造未来干预措施铺平道路,从而更好地满足这一患者群体的需求。目的:探讨MDTs在糖尿病和合并症患者管理中的益处和障碍。方法:对11名医生进行在线半结构化访谈(时长26 ~ 38分钟)。标准抽样包括来自相关医学专业和具有mdt经验的医生。访谈采用专题分析进行分析。结果:从专题分析中产生了四个主要主题:(1)MDT的好处,(2)MDT相关的挑战,(3)MDT和跨部门工作的必要性,以及(4)MDT成功的先决条件。改进的专业学习和关系,增强的能力杠杆和优化的治疗是一些主要的好处。孤立的卫生保健系统、文化和需要资源的mdt被认为是障碍。MDTs的组成和大纲,包括全科医生(gp)的作用,被认为是MDTs的重要方面。多病、多药和患者途径复杂性的增加需要多药联合治疗和跨部门工作。结论:我们的研究结果表明了MDTs的一些好处和障碍。在卫生保健领域,未来需要mdt和跨部门工作,并有可能应对糖尿病和合并症患者面临的一些挑战。了解和吸收医生的经验可以为未来护理管理的改进提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived benefits and barriers of multidisciplinary teams in the management of diabetes and comorbidities among physicians: A qualitative double-center study.

Background: The dynamics of working within multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) to manage diabetes and comorbidities remain underexplored. Investigating physicians' experiences provide insights into the benefits and challenges of MDTs in this complex context, paving the way for improving current practices and shaping future interventions to better address the needs of this patient population.

Aim: To explore perceived benefits and barriers of MDTs in the management of people with diabetes and comorbidities among physicians.

Methods: Eleven semi-structured interviews (duration 26-38 min) were conducted online among physicians. Criterion sampling of physicians from relevant medical specialties and with experience from MDTs were included. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Four major themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) benefits of MDT, (2) challenges related to MDT, (3) the need for MDTs and cross-sectorial work, and (4) prerequisites for successful MDTs. Improved professional learning and relationships, enhanced capacity leverage, and optimized treatment were some of the major benefits. Siloed healthcare systems and cultures and resource demanding MDTs were considered barriers. Composition and outline of the MDTs, including the role of general practitioners (GPs), were considered important aspects of MDTs. The increase in multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and complexity in patient pathways necessitates MDTs and cross-sectorial work.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate several benefits and barriers of MDTs. MDTs and cross-sectorial work are needed prospectively in healthcare and hold the potential to embrace some of the challenges encountered by people with diabetes and comorbidities. Understanding and incorporating experiences of physicians could inform future improvements in care management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信