对患者和关键信息提供者访谈的定性分析,为将HIV暴露前预防服务纳入阿拉巴马州的妇科护理提供信息。

IF 2.9
Women's health (London, England) Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1177/17455057251331714
Madeline C Pratt, Hannah Goymer, Kaylee Burgan, Lynn T Matthews, Bernadette Johnson, Desiree Phillips, Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Michael J Mugavero, Audra Williams, Latesha E Elopre
{"title":"对患者和关键信息提供者访谈的定性分析,为将HIV暴露前预防服务纳入阿拉巴马州的妇科护理提供信息。","authors":"Madeline C Pratt, Hannah Goymer, Kaylee Burgan, Lynn T Matthews, Bernadette Johnson, Desiree Phillips, Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Michael J Mugavero, Audra Williams, Latesha E Elopre","doi":"10.1177/17455057251331714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is low among Southern, Black cis-gender women (CGW). Gynecology clinics are well-positioned to integrate PrEP services as a component of sexual and reproductive healthcare for CGW.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Identify key determinants to PrEP implementation into routine gynecologic care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative, in-depth interviews (IDIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted IDIs with key informants (i.e., physicians, nurses, medical assistants) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with patients accessing care in a gynecology clinic serving under- and uninsured women in Alabama. IDIs explored individual-, setting-, and process-level factors that may impact PrEP care implementation in a clinic serving approximately 3000 women yearly, 64% of whom are Black women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten key informants participated in individual IDIs (median age 33.5, range 24-58 years, 80% female); 20 women participated in either 1 of 4 FGDs (<i>n</i> = 8) or an individual IDI (<i>n</i> = 12); median age 32, range 19-44. The following themes emerged: (1) patient- and provider-level stigmas related to sexuality, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and HIV limit discussions about sexual health and HIV prevention. (2) Providers report limited knowledge about prescribing and monitoring PrEP, which is reflected in patient's observations that providers do not routinely initiate discussions about HIV prevention or PrEP. (3) Providers utilize a more risk-based approach to PrEP counseling; patients expect non-targeted, comprehensive sexual health information. (4) Structural and social barriers will be challenges to implementing PrEP in routine gynecological care. (5) Patients and providers support a clinic-wide approach to integration of PrEP into gynecology clinics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Discussions around sexual health and STIs are limited in routine gynecologic care, but patients expect comprehensive counseling from knowledgeable providers. Additional provider training may increase comfort discussing and providing PrEP. These findings will inform development of implementation strategies to integrate PrEP care into gynecologic services.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"21 ","pages":"17455057251331714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative analysis of patient and key informant interviews to inform integration of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis services into gynecology care in Alabama.\",\"authors\":\"Madeline C Pratt, Hannah Goymer, Kaylee Burgan, Lynn T Matthews, Bernadette Johnson, Desiree Phillips, Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Michael J Mugavero, Audra Williams, Latesha E Elopre\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17455057251331714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is low among Southern, Black cis-gender women (CGW). Gynecology clinics are well-positioned to integrate PrEP services as a component of sexual and reproductive healthcare for CGW.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Identify key determinants to PrEP implementation into routine gynecologic care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative, in-depth interviews (IDIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted IDIs with key informants (i.e., physicians, nurses, medical assistants) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with patients accessing care in a gynecology clinic serving under- and uninsured women in Alabama. IDIs explored individual-, setting-, and process-level factors that may impact PrEP care implementation in a clinic serving approximately 3000 women yearly, 64% of whom are Black women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten key informants participated in individual IDIs (median age 33.5, range 24-58 years, 80% female); 20 women participated in either 1 of 4 FGDs (<i>n</i> = 8) or an individual IDI (<i>n</i> = 12); median age 32, range 19-44. The following themes emerged: (1) patient- and provider-level stigmas related to sexuality, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and HIV limit discussions about sexual health and HIV prevention. (2) Providers report limited knowledge about prescribing and monitoring PrEP, which is reflected in patient's observations that providers do not routinely initiate discussions about HIV prevention or PrEP. (3) Providers utilize a more risk-based approach to PrEP counseling; patients expect non-targeted, comprehensive sexual health information. (4) Structural and social barriers will be challenges to implementing PrEP in routine gynecological care. (5) Patients and providers support a clinic-wide approach to integration of PrEP into gynecology clinics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Discussions around sexual health and STIs are limited in routine gynecologic care, but patients expect comprehensive counseling from knowledgeable providers. Additional provider training may increase comfort discussing and providing PrEP. These findings will inform development of implementation strategies to integrate PrEP care into gynecologic services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"17455057251331714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062644/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251331714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251331714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:HIV暴露前预防(PrEP)的使用在南方,黑人顺性别妇女(CGW)中很低。妇科诊所能够很好地将PrEP服务整合为妇女性健康和生殖健康的一个组成部分。目的:确定PrEP在常规妇科护理中实施的关键决定因素。设计:定性、深度访谈(IDIs)。方法:我们与关键线人(即医生、护士、医疗助理)进行了IDIs,并与在阿拉巴马州一家妇科诊所接受治疗的患者进行了焦点小组讨论(fgd),该诊所为缺乏保险和没有保险的妇女提供服务。IDIs探讨了个人、环境和过程层面的因素,这些因素可能会影响每年为大约3000名妇女服务的诊所的PrEP护理实施,其中64%是黑人妇女。结果:10名关键信息者参加了个体IDIs(年龄中位数33.5岁,年龄范围24 ~ 58岁,80%为女性);20名妇女参加了4次fgd中的1次(n = 8)或单独的IDI (n = 12);年龄中位数32岁,范围19-44岁。出现了以下主题:(1)与性、性传播感染和艾滋病毒有关的患者和提供者层面的耻辱限制了关于性健康和艾滋病毒预防的讨论。(2)提供者报告对PrEP的处方和监测知识有限,这反映在患者的观察中,提供者通常不会发起关于艾滋病毒预防或PrEP的讨论。(3)提供者采用更多基于风险的方法进行PrEP咨询;患者期望获得非针对性的、全面的性健康信息。(4)结构和社会障碍将是PrEP在常规妇科护理中实施的挑战。(5)患者和提供者支持在全诊所范围内将PrEP纳入妇科诊所。结论:关于性健康和性传播感染的讨论在常规妇科护理中是有限的,但患者期望从有知识的提供者那里得到全面的咨询。额外的提供者培训可能会增加讨论和提供PrEP的舒适感。这些发现将为将PrEP护理纳入妇科服务的实施策略的制定提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Qualitative analysis of patient and key informant interviews to inform integration of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis services into gynecology care in Alabama.

Qualitative analysis of patient and key informant interviews to inform integration of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis services into gynecology care in Alabama.

Qualitative analysis of patient and key informant interviews to inform integration of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis services into gynecology care in Alabama.

Qualitative analysis of patient and key informant interviews to inform integration of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis services into gynecology care in Alabama.

Background: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is low among Southern, Black cis-gender women (CGW). Gynecology clinics are well-positioned to integrate PrEP services as a component of sexual and reproductive healthcare for CGW.

Objectives: Identify key determinants to PrEP implementation into routine gynecologic care.

Design: Qualitative, in-depth interviews (IDIs).

Methods: We conducted IDIs with key informants (i.e., physicians, nurses, medical assistants) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with patients accessing care in a gynecology clinic serving under- and uninsured women in Alabama. IDIs explored individual-, setting-, and process-level factors that may impact PrEP care implementation in a clinic serving approximately 3000 women yearly, 64% of whom are Black women.

Results: Ten key informants participated in individual IDIs (median age 33.5, range 24-58 years, 80% female); 20 women participated in either 1 of 4 FGDs (n = 8) or an individual IDI (n = 12); median age 32, range 19-44. The following themes emerged: (1) patient- and provider-level stigmas related to sexuality, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and HIV limit discussions about sexual health and HIV prevention. (2) Providers report limited knowledge about prescribing and monitoring PrEP, which is reflected in patient's observations that providers do not routinely initiate discussions about HIV prevention or PrEP. (3) Providers utilize a more risk-based approach to PrEP counseling; patients expect non-targeted, comprehensive sexual health information. (4) Structural and social barriers will be challenges to implementing PrEP in routine gynecological care. (5) Patients and providers support a clinic-wide approach to integration of PrEP into gynecology clinics.

Conclusion: Discussions around sexual health and STIs are limited in routine gynecologic care, but patients expect comprehensive counseling from knowledgeable providers. Additional provider training may increase comfort discussing and providing PrEP. These findings will inform development of implementation strategies to integrate PrEP care into gynecologic services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信