Hyejung Lee , Yoojin Kim , Sumi Oh , Chang-gi Park , Hyunsoo Kim
{"title":"癌症儿童疲劳量表:系统评价及信度概化元分析。","authors":"Hyejung Lee , Yoojin Kim , Sumi Oh , Chang-gi Park , Hyunsoo Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the overall reliability of the Fatigue Scale, the most widely used instrument for assessing fatigue severity in paediatric oncology patients, and to identify factors influencing the magnitude of reliability estimates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar were systematically searched. From an initial 492 articles identified, 21 were selected for the final analysis. Reliability generalization meta-analyses were performed using Cronbach's alpha extracted from individual studies. A random-effects model was applied for the analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most studies employed a cross-sectional design to assess fatigue symptoms in children and adolescents with various types of cancer. The mean weighted effect size for the total sample (n = 3,750) was 0.915 (95% CI = [0.888, 0.934]). A diagnosis of leukaemia/lymphoma was a significant moderator in the parent sample (effect estimate = 0.003, <em>P</em> < .01), while the use of a language other than English significantly moderated reliability in both the parent (effect estimate = 0.301, <em>P</em> < .01) and staff (effect estimate = –0.306, <em>P</em> < .01) samples.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Fatigue Scale is a highly reliable tool for assessing fatigue symptoms across different paediatric oncology populations. However, the reliability of the scale may be influenced by a diagnosis of leukaemia/lymphoma in children and language translation when used by parents and staff, requiring careful consideration when comparing and interpreting results.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><div>A reliable tool, the Fatigue Scale, is crucial for guiding clinical nurses and researchers. They can adopt the scale to assess the effects of an intervention aimed at relieving fatigue in paediatric oncology patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":"41 3","pages":"Article 151885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue Scale for Children With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hyejung Lee , Yoojin Kim , Sumi Oh , Chang-gi Park , Hyunsoo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the overall reliability of the Fatigue Scale, the most widely used instrument for assessing fatigue severity in paediatric oncology patients, and to identify factors influencing the magnitude of reliability estimates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar were systematically searched. From an initial 492 articles identified, 21 were selected for the final analysis. Reliability generalization meta-analyses were performed using Cronbach's alpha extracted from individual studies. A random-effects model was applied for the analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most studies employed a cross-sectional design to assess fatigue symptoms in children and adolescents with various types of cancer. The mean weighted effect size for the total sample (n = 3,750) was 0.915 (95% CI = [0.888, 0.934]). A diagnosis of leukaemia/lymphoma was a significant moderator in the parent sample (effect estimate = 0.003, <em>P</em> < .01), while the use of a language other than English significantly moderated reliability in both the parent (effect estimate = 0.301, <em>P</em> < .01) and staff (effect estimate = –0.306, <em>P</em> < .01) samples.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Fatigue Scale is a highly reliable tool for assessing fatigue symptoms across different paediatric oncology populations. However, the reliability of the scale may be influenced by a diagnosis of leukaemia/lymphoma in children and language translation when used by parents and staff, requiring careful consideration when comparing and interpreting results.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><div>A reliable tool, the Fatigue Scale, is crucial for guiding clinical nurses and researchers. They can adopt the scale to assess the effects of an intervention aimed at relieving fatigue in paediatric oncology patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 151885\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208125000786\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208125000786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fatigue Scale for Children With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-analysis
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the overall reliability of the Fatigue Scale, the most widely used instrument for assessing fatigue severity in paediatric oncology patients, and to identify factors influencing the magnitude of reliability estimates.
Methods
PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar were systematically searched. From an initial 492 articles identified, 21 were selected for the final analysis. Reliability generalization meta-analyses were performed using Cronbach's alpha extracted from individual studies. A random-effects model was applied for the analysis.
Results
Most studies employed a cross-sectional design to assess fatigue symptoms in children and adolescents with various types of cancer. The mean weighted effect size for the total sample (n = 3,750) was 0.915 (95% CI = [0.888, 0.934]). A diagnosis of leukaemia/lymphoma was a significant moderator in the parent sample (effect estimate = 0.003, P < .01), while the use of a language other than English significantly moderated reliability in both the parent (effect estimate = 0.301, P < .01) and staff (effect estimate = –0.306, P < .01) samples.
Conclusions
The Fatigue Scale is a highly reliable tool for assessing fatigue symptoms across different paediatric oncology populations. However, the reliability of the scale may be influenced by a diagnosis of leukaemia/lymphoma in children and language translation when used by parents and staff, requiring careful consideration when comparing and interpreting results.
Implications for Nursing Practice
A reliable tool, the Fatigue Scale, is crucial for guiding clinical nurses and researchers. They can adopt the scale to assess the effects of an intervention aimed at relieving fatigue in paediatric oncology patients.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.