“真的要小心”:临床医生对院内恶化检测的智能增强工具的看法。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI:10.1055/a-2505-7743
Jorie M Butler, Alyssa Doubleday, Usman Sattar, Mary Nies, Amanda Jeppesen, Melanie Wright, Thomas Reese, Kensaku Kawamoto, Guilherme Del Fiol, Karl Madaras-Kelly
{"title":"“真的要小心”:临床医生对院内恶化检测的智能增强工具的看法。","authors":"Jorie M Butler, Alyssa Doubleday, Usman Sattar, Mary Nies, Amanda Jeppesen, Melanie Wright, Thomas Reese, Kensaku Kawamoto, Guilherme Del Fiol, Karl Madaras-Kelly","doi":"10.1055/a-2505-7743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to explore clinicians' perceptions and preferences of prototype intelligence augmentation (IA)-based visualization displays of in-hospital deterioration risk scores to inform future user interface design and implementation in clinical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Prototype visualization displays incorporating an IA-based early warning score (EWS) for in-hospital deterioration were developed using cognitive theory and user-centered design principles. The displays featured variations of EWS and clinical data arranged in multipatient and single-patient views. Physician and nurse participants with at least 5 years of clinical experience were recruited to participate in semistructured qualitative interviews focused on understanding their experiences with IA and thoughts and preferences about the prototype displays. A thematic analysis was performed on these data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Six themes were identified: (1) clinicians perceive IA as valuable with some caveats related to function and context; (2) individual differences among users influence preferences for customizability; (3) EWS are particularly useful for patient triage; (4) need for patient-centered contextual information to complement EWS; (5) perspectives related to understanding the EWS composition; and (6) design preferences that focus on clarity for interpretation of information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study demonstrates clinicians' interest in and reservations about IA tools for clinical deterioration. The findings underscore the importance of understanding clinicians' cognitive needs and framing IA-generated tools as complementary to support them. A clinician focuses on high-level pattern matching information, and clinician's comments related to the power of consistency with typical views (e.g., this is \"how I usually see things\"), and questions regarding support of score interpretation (e.g., age of the data, questions about what the model \"knows\") suggest some of the challenges of IA implementation. The findings also identify design implications including the need for contextualizing the EWS for the patient's specific situation, incorporating trend information, and explaining the display purpose for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 2","pages":"377-392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Be Really Careful about That\\\": Clinicians' Perceptions of an Intelligence Augmentation Tool for In-Hospital Deterioration Detection.\",\"authors\":\"Jorie M Butler, Alyssa Doubleday, Usman Sattar, Mary Nies, Amanda Jeppesen, Melanie Wright, Thomas Reese, Kensaku Kawamoto, Guilherme Del Fiol, Karl Madaras-Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2505-7743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to explore clinicians' perceptions and preferences of prototype intelligence augmentation (IA)-based visualization displays of in-hospital deterioration risk scores to inform future user interface design and implementation in clinical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Prototype visualization displays incorporating an IA-based early warning score (EWS) for in-hospital deterioration were developed using cognitive theory and user-centered design principles. The displays featured variations of EWS and clinical data arranged in multipatient and single-patient views. Physician and nurse participants with at least 5 years of clinical experience were recruited to participate in semistructured qualitative interviews focused on understanding their experiences with IA and thoughts and preferences about the prototype displays. A thematic analysis was performed on these data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Six themes were identified: (1) clinicians perceive IA as valuable with some caveats related to function and context; (2) individual differences among users influence preferences for customizability; (3) EWS are particularly useful for patient triage; (4) need for patient-centered contextual information to complement EWS; (5) perspectives related to understanding the EWS composition; and (6) design preferences that focus on clarity for interpretation of information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study demonstrates clinicians' interest in and reservations about IA tools for clinical deterioration. The findings underscore the importance of understanding clinicians' cognitive needs and framing IA-generated tools as complementary to support them. A clinician focuses on high-level pattern matching information, and clinician's comments related to the power of consistency with typical views (e.g., this is \\\"how I usually see things\\\"), and questions regarding support of score interpretation (e.g., age of the data, questions about what the model \\\"knows\\\") suggest some of the challenges of IA implementation. The findings also identify design implications including the need for contextualizing the EWS for the patient's specific situation, incorporating trend information, and explaining the display purpose for clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"377-392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043375/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2505-7743\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2505-7743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨临床医生对基于原型智能增强(IA)的住院恶化风险评分可视化显示的感知和偏好,为未来临床护理用户界面的设计和实施提供参考。方法:采用认知理论和以用户为中心的设计原则,开发了包含基于ia的住院恶化早期预警评分(EWS)的原型可视化显示。显示器的特点是EWS的变化和临床数据排列在多患者和单患者视图中。研究人员招募了至少有5年临床经验的医生和护士参加半结构化的定性访谈,重点是了解他们对IA的经历以及对原型展示的想法和偏好。对这些数据进行了专题分析。结果:确定了六个主题:(1)临床医生认为IA是有价值的,但有一些与功能和背景相关的警告;(2)用户个体差异影响可定制性偏好;(3) EWS对病人分诊特别有用;(4)需要以患者为中心的语境信息来补充EWS;(5)了解EWS组成的相关视角;(6)设计偏好,侧重于信息解释的清晰度。结论:本研究表明临床医生对IA工具治疗临床恶化的兴趣和保留。研究结果强调了理解临床医生的认知需求和构建ia生成的工具作为补充来支持他们的重要性。临床医生关注高级模式匹配信息,临床医生的评论与典型观点的一致性有关(例如,这是“我通常如何看待事物”),以及关于支持分数解释的问题(例如,数据的年龄,关于模型“知道”什么的问题),这些都表明了IA实施的一些挑战。研究结果还确定了设计含义,包括需要根据患者的具体情况将EWS置于环境中,纳入趋势信息,并解释临床使用的显示目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Be Really Careful about That": Clinicians' Perceptions of an Intelligence Augmentation Tool for In-Hospital Deterioration Detection.

Objective:  This study aimed to explore clinicians' perceptions and preferences of prototype intelligence augmentation (IA)-based visualization displays of in-hospital deterioration risk scores to inform future user interface design and implementation in clinical care.

Methods:  Prototype visualization displays incorporating an IA-based early warning score (EWS) for in-hospital deterioration were developed using cognitive theory and user-centered design principles. The displays featured variations of EWS and clinical data arranged in multipatient and single-patient views. Physician and nurse participants with at least 5 years of clinical experience were recruited to participate in semistructured qualitative interviews focused on understanding their experiences with IA and thoughts and preferences about the prototype displays. A thematic analysis was performed on these data.

Results:  Six themes were identified: (1) clinicians perceive IA as valuable with some caveats related to function and context; (2) individual differences among users influence preferences for customizability; (3) EWS are particularly useful for patient triage; (4) need for patient-centered contextual information to complement EWS; (5) perspectives related to understanding the EWS composition; and (6) design preferences that focus on clarity for interpretation of information.

Conclusion:  This study demonstrates clinicians' interest in and reservations about IA tools for clinical deterioration. The findings underscore the importance of understanding clinicians' cognitive needs and framing IA-generated tools as complementary to support them. A clinician focuses on high-level pattern matching information, and clinician's comments related to the power of consistency with typical views (e.g., this is "how I usually see things"), and questions regarding support of score interpretation (e.g., age of the data, questions about what the model "knows") suggest some of the challenges of IA implementation. The findings also identify design implications including the need for contextualizing the EWS for the patient's specific situation, incorporating trend information, and explaining the display purpose for clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信