{"title":"未为公开的社会需求寻求帮助的潜在儿科保健后果。","authors":"Arvin Garg MD, MPH , Annelise Brochier MPH , Yorghos Tripodis PhD , Katherine BarahonaPaz BA , Mari-Lynn Drainoni PhD, MEd","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the association between double loss (disclosure of social needs without receiving assistance) with low-income children’s health care utilization outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were from a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial evaluating a social needs screening and referral intervention (WE CARE) implemented in 3 community health centers. WE CARE included 3 components: 1) social risk/need screener assessing parental desire for assistance with unmet social needs, 2) resource information referrals, and 3) patient navigator. A family was defined as experiencing double loss if, at their child’s well-child visits (WCVs) from birth to age 3, there was at least 1 scanned screener with a request for help without a referral documented in the electronic health record. Multiple logistic regression was used to compare rates of double loss with adherence to WCV and immunization schedules.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the cohort of children (n = 403), 43.4% were Black, 21.1% Latino/a/e, and 13.9% Asian. Overall, 40.5% of parents experienced double loss. Families who experienced double loss had fewer reported social needs (0.3 vs 1.5, <em>P</em> < 0.001). Children whose families’ experienced double loss had significantly lower WCV adherence ratios in the first 3 years of life (0.40 vs 0.43, <em>P</em> < 0.0001). Similarly, the immunization adherence ratio for children was significantly lower for families who experienced double loss than for families who did not experience double loss (0.79 vs 0.92, <em>P</em> < 0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Families experienced double loss had significantly lower WCV and immunization adherence. These exploratory findings carry significant implications for pediatric practice, guidelines, and health policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":"25 6","pages":"Article 102834"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential Pediatric Health Care Consequences of Not Getting Help for Disclosed Social Needs\",\"authors\":\"Arvin Garg MD, MPH , Annelise Brochier MPH , Yorghos Tripodis PhD , Katherine BarahonaPaz BA , Mari-Lynn Drainoni PhD, MEd\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the association between double loss (disclosure of social needs without receiving assistance) with low-income children’s health care utilization outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were from a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial evaluating a social needs screening and referral intervention (WE CARE) implemented in 3 community health centers. WE CARE included 3 components: 1) social risk/need screener assessing parental desire for assistance with unmet social needs, 2) resource information referrals, and 3) patient navigator. A family was defined as experiencing double loss if, at their child’s well-child visits (WCVs) from birth to age 3, there was at least 1 scanned screener with a request for help without a referral documented in the electronic health record. Multiple logistic regression was used to compare rates of double loss with adherence to WCV and immunization schedules.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the cohort of children (n = 403), 43.4% were Black, 21.1% Latino/a/e, and 13.9% Asian. Overall, 40.5% of parents experienced double loss. Families who experienced double loss had fewer reported social needs (0.3 vs 1.5, <em>P</em> < 0.001). Children whose families’ experienced double loss had significantly lower WCV adherence ratios in the first 3 years of life (0.40 vs 0.43, <em>P</em> < 0.0001). Similarly, the immunization adherence ratio for children was significantly lower for families who experienced double loss than for families who did not experience double loss (0.79 vs 0.92, <em>P</em> < 0.0001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Families experienced double loss had significantly lower WCV and immunization adherence. These exploratory findings carry significant implications for pediatric practice, guidelines, and health policy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285925000592\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285925000592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Potential Pediatric Health Care Consequences of Not Getting Help for Disclosed Social Needs
Objective
To assess the association between double loss (disclosure of social needs without receiving assistance) with low-income children’s health care utilization outcomes.
Methods
Data were from a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial evaluating a social needs screening and referral intervention (WE CARE) implemented in 3 community health centers. WE CARE included 3 components: 1) social risk/need screener assessing parental desire for assistance with unmet social needs, 2) resource information referrals, and 3) patient navigator. A family was defined as experiencing double loss if, at their child’s well-child visits (WCVs) from birth to age 3, there was at least 1 scanned screener with a request for help without a referral documented in the electronic health record. Multiple logistic regression was used to compare rates of double loss with adherence to WCV and immunization schedules.
Results
Among the cohort of children (n = 403), 43.4% were Black, 21.1% Latino/a/e, and 13.9% Asian. Overall, 40.5% of parents experienced double loss. Families who experienced double loss had fewer reported social needs (0.3 vs 1.5, P < 0.001). Children whose families’ experienced double loss had significantly lower WCV adherence ratios in the first 3 years of life (0.40 vs 0.43, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the immunization adherence ratio for children was significantly lower for families who experienced double loss than for families who did not experience double loss (0.79 vs 0.92, P < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Families experienced double loss had significantly lower WCV and immunization adherence. These exploratory findings carry significant implications for pediatric practice, guidelines, and health policy.
期刊介绍:
Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.