C J Staniorski, A Madhavaram, D Sharbaugh, A Watts, R V Vasan, V N Pena, A M Quinn, J M Myrga, Y Krampe, J G Yabes, J E Chelly, B J Davies, B L Jacobs
{"title":"布比卡因-美洛昔康扩展配方(Zynrelef®)用于开放泌尿外科手术的初步经验。","authors":"C J Staniorski, A Madhavaram, D Sharbaugh, A Watts, R V Vasan, V N Pena, A M Quinn, J M Myrga, Y Krampe, J G Yabes, J E Chelly, B J Davies, B L Jacobs","doi":"10.36266/JPMTC/122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The opioid epidemic has led to efforts to improve peri-operative pain control by using multiple modalities. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bupivacaine meloxicam extended formulation (Zynrelef<sup>®</sup>) in open urologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who received Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> during open prostatectomy and nephrectomy were retrospectively reviewed from April 2022 through December 2022. Opioid consumption, patient reported pain, and complications were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 116 patients were included, 44 of whom received Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> (38%). The groups were similar in terms of comorbidities and procedures. Fifty-nine patients (51%) underwent prostatectomy and fifty-seven underwent radical or partial nephrectomy (49%). Morphine milligram equivalents decreased over the first three post-operative days in both groups. The largest difference in opioid consumption between the Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> group vs the control group occurred on post-operative day 2, with patients in the with Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> group consuming fewer narcotics (median morphine milligram equivalents 8 vs. 15, standardized bias 0.38). Patient reported pain on post-operative day 1 was clinically similar in the Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> group vs the control group (5 vs. 4 on 10-point scale) while post-operative calls to the office (34% vs. 19%) and emergency visits (11% vs. 1%) were increased in those receiving Zynrelef<sup>®</sup>. Three wound infections occurred in the Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> group (7%), all following prostatectomy with none occurring in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> administration following urologic procedures may decrease opioid requirements post-operatively. However, the rate of wound infections, emergency visits, and postoperative calls may be increased compared to standard methods of pain control.</p>","PeriodicalId":520537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain management and therapeutic care","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial Experience with Bupivacaine-Meloxicam Extended Formulation (Zynrelef<sup>®</sup>) For Open Urologic Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"C J Staniorski, A Madhavaram, D Sharbaugh, A Watts, R V Vasan, V N Pena, A M Quinn, J M Myrga, Y Krampe, J G Yabes, J E Chelly, B J Davies, B L Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.36266/JPMTC/122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The opioid epidemic has led to efforts to improve peri-operative pain control by using multiple modalities. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bupivacaine meloxicam extended formulation (Zynrelef<sup>®</sup>) in open urologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who received Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> during open prostatectomy and nephrectomy were retrospectively reviewed from April 2022 through December 2022. Opioid consumption, patient reported pain, and complications were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 116 patients were included, 44 of whom received Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> (38%). The groups were similar in terms of comorbidities and procedures. Fifty-nine patients (51%) underwent prostatectomy and fifty-seven underwent radical or partial nephrectomy (49%). Morphine milligram equivalents decreased over the first three post-operative days in both groups. The largest difference in opioid consumption between the Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> group vs the control group occurred on post-operative day 2, with patients in the with Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> group consuming fewer narcotics (median morphine milligram equivalents 8 vs. 15, standardized bias 0.38). Patient reported pain on post-operative day 1 was clinically similar in the Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> group vs the control group (5 vs. 4 on 10-point scale) while post-operative calls to the office (34% vs. 19%) and emergency visits (11% vs. 1%) were increased in those receiving Zynrelef<sup>®</sup>. Three wound infections occurred in the Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> group (7%), all following prostatectomy with none occurring in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zynrelef<sup>®</sup> administration following urologic procedures may decrease opioid requirements post-operatively. However, the rate of wound infections, emergency visits, and postoperative calls may be increased compared to standard methods of pain control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain management and therapeutic care\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010834/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain management and therapeutic care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36266/JPMTC/122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain management and therapeutic care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36266/JPMTC/122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Initial Experience with Bupivacaine-Meloxicam Extended Formulation (Zynrelef®) For Open Urologic Surgery.
Introduction: The opioid epidemic has led to efforts to improve peri-operative pain control by using multiple modalities. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bupivacaine meloxicam extended formulation (Zynrelef®) in open urologic surgery.
Materials and methods: Patients who received Zynrelef® during open prostatectomy and nephrectomy were retrospectively reviewed from April 2022 through December 2022. Opioid consumption, patient reported pain, and complications were collected.
Results: A total of 116 patients were included, 44 of whom received Zynrelef® (38%). The groups were similar in terms of comorbidities and procedures. Fifty-nine patients (51%) underwent prostatectomy and fifty-seven underwent radical or partial nephrectomy (49%). Morphine milligram equivalents decreased over the first three post-operative days in both groups. The largest difference in opioid consumption between the Zynrelef® group vs the control group occurred on post-operative day 2, with patients in the with Zynrelef® group consuming fewer narcotics (median morphine milligram equivalents 8 vs. 15, standardized bias 0.38). Patient reported pain on post-operative day 1 was clinically similar in the Zynrelef® group vs the control group (5 vs. 4 on 10-point scale) while post-operative calls to the office (34% vs. 19%) and emergency visits (11% vs. 1%) were increased in those receiving Zynrelef®. Three wound infections occurred in the Zynrelef® group (7%), all following prostatectomy with none occurring in the control group.
Conclusions: Zynrelef® administration following urologic procedures may decrease opioid requirements post-operatively. However, the rate of wound infections, emergency visits, and postoperative calls may be increased compared to standard methods of pain control.