两种超声衰减成像模式使用不同频率评估肝脂肪变性的前瞻性比较。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ultrasonography Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.14366/usg.24223
Hyeon Ji Jang, Jong Keon Jang, Subin Heo, Boyeon Koo, In Hye Song, Hee Jun Park, Seonghun Yoon, So Yeon Kim
{"title":"两种超声衰减成像模式使用不同频率评估肝脂肪变性的前瞻性比较。","authors":"Hyeon Ji Jang, Jong Keon Jang, Subin Heo, Boyeon Koo, In Hye Song, Hee Jun Park, Seonghun Yoon, So Yeon Kim","doi":"10.14366/usg.24223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared the diagnostic performance of two attenuation imaging (ATI) modes-low-frequency (3 MHz) and high-frequency (4 MHz)-for assessing hepatic steatosis, with histopathological hepatic fat fraction (HFF) as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective single-center study enrolled participants with suspected metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) scheduled for liver biopsy or surgery between June 2023 and June 2024. Attenuation coefficient (AC) values were consecutively measured using low- and high-frequency ATI modes, while the skin-to-region of interest distance (SRD) was measured simultaneously. Spearman correlation analysis evaluated the relationships of AC with HFF and SRD, and linear regression identified factors affecting AC. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 119 participants (mean age, 37.2±12.0 years; 87 men) were included, with 73 (61.3%) diagnosed with MASLD. HFF ranged from 0% to 50%. The AC values in the lowfrequency mode were significantly higher than those in the high-frequency mode (0.61 vs. 0.54 dB/cm/MHz, P<0.001). HFF significantly influenced AC in both modes, whereas SRD affected AC only in the high-frequency mode (P<0.001). AC correlated positively with HFF in both modes (rs≥0.514, P<0.001) and negatively with SRD in the high-frequency mode (rs=-0.338, P<0.001). The AUROC for hepatic steatosis did not differ significantly between the two modes (0.751 vs. 0.771, P=0.609).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The low-frequency mode produced higher AC values than the high-frequency mode and demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracy for assessing hepatic steatosis. Unlike the high-frequency mode, the low-frequency mode was not influenced by SRD.</p>","PeriodicalId":54227,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasonography","volume":"44 3","pages":"202-211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective comparison of two ultrasound attenuation imaging modes using different frequencies for assessing hepatic steatosis.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeon Ji Jang, Jong Keon Jang, Subin Heo, Boyeon Koo, In Hye Song, Hee Jun Park, Seonghun Yoon, So Yeon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.14366/usg.24223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared the diagnostic performance of two attenuation imaging (ATI) modes-low-frequency (3 MHz) and high-frequency (4 MHz)-for assessing hepatic steatosis, with histopathological hepatic fat fraction (HFF) as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective single-center study enrolled participants with suspected metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) scheduled for liver biopsy or surgery between June 2023 and June 2024. Attenuation coefficient (AC) values were consecutively measured using low- and high-frequency ATI modes, while the skin-to-region of interest distance (SRD) was measured simultaneously. Spearman correlation analysis evaluated the relationships of AC with HFF and SRD, and linear regression identified factors affecting AC. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 119 participants (mean age, 37.2±12.0 years; 87 men) were included, with 73 (61.3%) diagnosed with MASLD. HFF ranged from 0% to 50%. The AC values in the lowfrequency mode were significantly higher than those in the high-frequency mode (0.61 vs. 0.54 dB/cm/MHz, P<0.001). HFF significantly influenced AC in both modes, whereas SRD affected AC only in the high-frequency mode (P<0.001). AC correlated positively with HFF in both modes (rs≥0.514, P<0.001) and negatively with SRD in the high-frequency mode (rs=-0.338, P<0.001). The AUROC for hepatic steatosis did not differ significantly between the two modes (0.751 vs. 0.771, P=0.609).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The low-frequency mode produced higher AC values than the high-frequency mode and demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracy for assessing hepatic steatosis. Unlike the high-frequency mode, the low-frequency mode was not influenced by SRD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasonography\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"202-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081138/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasonography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.24223\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.24223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究以肝组织病理学脂肪分数(HFF)为参考标准,比较低频(3mhz)和高频(4mhz)两种衰减成像(ATI)模式对肝脂肪变性的诊断效果。方法:这项前瞻性单中心研究纳入了疑似代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)的参与者,计划在2023年6月至2024年6月期间进行肝活检或手术。使用低频和高频ATI模式连续测量衰减系数(AC)值,同时测量皮肤到感兴趣区域的距离(SRD)。Spearman相关分析评估了AC与HFF和SRD的关系,线性回归确定了AC的影响因素。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评估诊断效果。结果:共纳入119例患者(平均年龄37.2±12.0岁;87名男性)被纳入,其中73名(61.3%)被诊断为MASLD。HFF范围从0%到50%。低频模式的AC值显著高于高频模式(0.61 vs. 0.54 dB/cm/MHz)。结论:低频模式比高频模式产生更高的AC值,并且在评估肝脂肪变性方面具有相当的诊断准确性。与高频模式不同,低频模式不受SRD的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prospective comparison of two ultrasound attenuation imaging modes using different frequencies for assessing hepatic steatosis.

Purpose: This study compared the diagnostic performance of two attenuation imaging (ATI) modes-low-frequency (3 MHz) and high-frequency (4 MHz)-for assessing hepatic steatosis, with histopathological hepatic fat fraction (HFF) as the reference standard.

Methods: This prospective single-center study enrolled participants with suspected metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) scheduled for liver biopsy or surgery between June 2023 and June 2024. Attenuation coefficient (AC) values were consecutively measured using low- and high-frequency ATI modes, while the skin-to-region of interest distance (SRD) was measured simultaneously. Spearman correlation analysis evaluated the relationships of AC with HFF and SRD, and linear regression identified factors affecting AC. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results: In total, 119 participants (mean age, 37.2±12.0 years; 87 men) were included, with 73 (61.3%) diagnosed with MASLD. HFF ranged from 0% to 50%. The AC values in the lowfrequency mode were significantly higher than those in the high-frequency mode (0.61 vs. 0.54 dB/cm/MHz, P<0.001). HFF significantly influenced AC in both modes, whereas SRD affected AC only in the high-frequency mode (P<0.001). AC correlated positively with HFF in both modes (rs≥0.514, P<0.001) and negatively with SRD in the high-frequency mode (rs=-0.338, P<0.001). The AUROC for hepatic steatosis did not differ significantly between the two modes (0.751 vs. 0.771, P=0.609).

Conclusion: The low-frequency mode produced higher AC values than the high-frequency mode and demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracy for assessing hepatic steatosis. Unlike the high-frequency mode, the low-frequency mode was not influenced by SRD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.50%
发文量
78
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasonography, the official English-language journal of the Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (KSUM), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to practice, research, technology, and education dealing with medical ultrasound. It is renamed from the Journal of Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine in January 2014, and published four times per year: January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1. Original articles, technical notes, topical reviews, perspectives, pictorial essays, and timely editorial materials are published in Ultrasonography covering state-of-the-art content. Ultrasonography aims to provide updated information on new diagnostic concepts and technical developments, including experimental animal studies using new equipment in addition to well-designed reviews of contemporary issues in patient care. Along with running KSUM Open, the annual international congress of KSUM, Ultrasonography also serves as a medium for cooperation among physicians and specialists from around the world who are focusing on various ultrasound technology and disease problems and relevant basic science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信