使用协作护理模型将行为卫生保健整合到低屏障艾滋病毒诊所:患者护理级联结果和决定因素的混合方法评估。

Scott Halliday, Lydia A Chwastiak, Kaitlin Zinsli, Ramona Emerson, Teagan Wood, Meena S Ramchandani, Kenneth Sherr, Judith I Tsui, Bradley H Wagenaar, Deepa Rao, Julia C Dombrowski
{"title":"使用协作护理模型将行为卫生保健整合到低屏障艾滋病毒诊所:患者护理级联结果和决定因素的混合方法评估。","authors":"Scott Halliday, Lydia A Chwastiak, Kaitlin Zinsli, Ramona Emerson, Teagan Wood, Meena S Ramchandani, Kenneth Sherr, Judith I Tsui, Bradley H Wagenaar, Deepa Rao, Julia C Dombrowski","doi":"10.1186/s43058-025-00738-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-barrier HIV care is an evidence-based intervention to improve HIV outcomes among those who have complex barriers to care, but the walk-in model poses challenges to integrating behavioral health services. We evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of a Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) for treatment of depression and opioid use disorder in a low-barrier clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study, we accessed data from patient records to generate a care cascade for the number of patients enrolled in the first six months of the program and conducted individual interviews with patients and staff to interpret the care cascade findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 175 patients who visited the clinic, 36% were screened for, 24% were referred to, 15% completed an intake for, and 9% engaged in CoCM. The interviews revealed that screening was limited by a lack of clarity among staff about services offered in CoCM, staff forgetting the screening process, and limited time during patent visits. Referrals were limited by low buy-in among staff and patient complexity. Intakes were limited by time and space constraints in the care setting and competing acute patient needs. The care manager's ability to embody the clinic's culture facilitated engagement among patients who completed intakes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Staff perceived CoCM to be acceptable and feasible to implement, but only in the context of multiple barriers to implementation and challenges to systematic screening and measurement-based care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating behavioral health care into a low-barrier HIV clinic using the Collaborative Care Model: a mixed methods evaluation of patient care cascade outcomes and determinants.\",\"authors\":\"Scott Halliday, Lydia A Chwastiak, Kaitlin Zinsli, Ramona Emerson, Teagan Wood, Meena S Ramchandani, Kenneth Sherr, Judith I Tsui, Bradley H Wagenaar, Deepa Rao, Julia C Dombrowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43058-025-00738-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-barrier HIV care is an evidence-based intervention to improve HIV outcomes among those who have complex barriers to care, but the walk-in model poses challenges to integrating behavioral health services. We evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of a Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) for treatment of depression and opioid use disorder in a low-barrier clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study, we accessed data from patient records to generate a care cascade for the number of patients enrolled in the first six months of the program and conducted individual interviews with patients and staff to interpret the care cascade findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 175 patients who visited the clinic, 36% were screened for, 24% were referred to, 15% completed an intake for, and 9% engaged in CoCM. The interviews revealed that screening was limited by a lack of clarity among staff about services offered in CoCM, staff forgetting the screening process, and limited time during patent visits. Referrals were limited by low buy-in among staff and patient complexity. Intakes were limited by time and space constraints in the care setting and competing acute patient needs. The care manager's ability to embody the clinic's culture facilitated engagement among patients who completed intakes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Staff perceived CoCM to be acceptable and feasible to implement, but only in the context of multiple barriers to implementation and challenges to systematic screening and measurement-based care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053849/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00738-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00738-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低屏障艾滋病毒护理是一种基于证据的干预措施,可改善那些有复杂护理障碍的人的艾滋病毒治疗结果,但步入式模式对整合行为卫生服务提出了挑战。我们评估了协作护理模式(CoCM)在低障碍诊所治疗抑郁症和阿片类药物使用障碍的可接受性和可行性。方法:在一项顺序解释性混合方法试点研究中,我们从患者记录中获取数据,以生成在该计划前六个月登记的患者数量的护理级联,并对患者和工作人员进行个人访谈,以解释护理级联的发现。结果:在175例就诊的患者中,36%接受了筛查,24%转诊,15%完成了CoCM的摄入,9%参与了CoCM。访谈显示,由于工作人员对CoCM提供的服务不清楚,工作人员忘记了筛选过程,以及专利访问期间的时间有限,筛选受到限制。由于工作人员的接受程度低和患者的复杂性,转诊受到限制。由于护理环境的时间和空间限制以及急性患者需求的竞争,摄入量受到限制。护理经理体现诊所文化的能力促进了完成治疗的患者的参与。结论:工作人员认为CoCM是可接受和可行的,但只有在实施的多重障碍和系统性筛查和基于测量的护理面临挑战的背景下。试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating behavioral health care into a low-barrier HIV clinic using the Collaborative Care Model: a mixed methods evaluation of patient care cascade outcomes and determinants.

Background: Low-barrier HIV care is an evidence-based intervention to improve HIV outcomes among those who have complex barriers to care, but the walk-in model poses challenges to integrating behavioral health services. We evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of a Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) for treatment of depression and opioid use disorder in a low-barrier clinic.

Methods: In a sequential explanatory mixed methods pilot study, we accessed data from patient records to generate a care cascade for the number of patients enrolled in the first six months of the program and conducted individual interviews with patients and staff to interpret the care cascade findings.

Results: Among 175 patients who visited the clinic, 36% were screened for, 24% were referred to, 15% completed an intake for, and 9% engaged in CoCM. The interviews revealed that screening was limited by a lack of clarity among staff about services offered in CoCM, staff forgetting the screening process, and limited time during patent visits. Referrals were limited by low buy-in among staff and patient complexity. Intakes were limited by time and space constraints in the care setting and competing acute patient needs. The care manager's ability to embody the clinic's culture facilitated engagement among patients who completed intakes.

Conclusions: Staff perceived CoCM to be acceptable and feasible to implement, but only in the context of multiple barriers to implementation and challenges to systematic screening and measurement-based care.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信