Christina M Lamb, Dimitra V Pouliopoulou, Ken Kirkwood, Kelsey Groenenboom, Megan Kennedy, Edith Pituskin
{"title":"良心干预的有效性:一项系统评价的结果。","authors":"Christina M Lamb, Dimitra V Pouliopoulou, Ken Kirkwood, Kelsey Groenenboom, Megan Kennedy, Edith Pituskin","doi":"10.1177/09697330251333386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research indicates that conscience is an asset to healthcare professional's personal and professional practice. However, little work has been done to support healthcare professionals to use and understand their conscience for moral decision-making. Disparity exists between international and national bodies that value conscience for healthcare professionals and the paucity of practice supports available to formally assist healthcare professionals to openly discuss and then navigate their moral decisions arising from their conscience. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of existing interventions aimed at supporting healthcare professionals to understand and use their conscience for healthcare practice. This review was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses. International, interdisciplinary databases including Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, ATLA Religion, Religion and Philosophy Collection, PhilPapers, Scopus and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials were searched and quantitative as well as qualitative outcomes were reported. We found 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction and synthesis. Five interventions were identified that aimed to address aspects of HCP's conscience. No interventions were identified that aim to support healthcare professionals to understand or use their conscience for moral decision-making in practice. Empirical and humanities research indicates that conscience is essential to healthcare practice, but issues of conscience remain a polarizing experience for many HCPs. Intervention and education-based research are therefore needed to support HCP's understanding and use of conscience for practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251333386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of interventions on conscience: Findings of a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Christina M Lamb, Dimitra V Pouliopoulou, Ken Kirkwood, Kelsey Groenenboom, Megan Kennedy, Edith Pituskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09697330251333386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research indicates that conscience is an asset to healthcare professional's personal and professional practice. However, little work has been done to support healthcare professionals to use and understand their conscience for moral decision-making. Disparity exists between international and national bodies that value conscience for healthcare professionals and the paucity of practice supports available to formally assist healthcare professionals to openly discuss and then navigate their moral decisions arising from their conscience. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of existing interventions aimed at supporting healthcare professionals to understand and use their conscience for healthcare practice. This review was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses. International, interdisciplinary databases including Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, ATLA Religion, Religion and Philosophy Collection, PhilPapers, Scopus and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials were searched and quantitative as well as qualitative outcomes were reported. We found 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction and synthesis. Five interventions were identified that aimed to address aspects of HCP's conscience. No interventions were identified that aim to support healthcare professionals to understand or use their conscience for moral decision-making in practice. Empirical and humanities research indicates that conscience is essential to healthcare practice, but issues of conscience remain a polarizing experience for many HCPs. Intervention and education-based research are therefore needed to support HCP's understanding and use of conscience for practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9697330251333386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251333386\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251333386","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究表明,良心是医疗保健专业人员的个人和专业实践的资产。然而,支持医疗保健专业人员在道德决策中使用和理解他们的良心的工作很少。重视医疗保健专业人员良心的国际和国家机构之间存在差异,并且缺乏实践支持,可以正式帮助医疗保健专业人员公开讨论并引导他们的道德决定。因此,本系统综述的目的是检查现有干预措施的有效性,旨在支持医疗保健专业人员理解并在医疗保健实践中使用他们的良心。本综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行和报告。检索国际跨学科数据库,包括Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Academic Search Complete、ATLA Religion、Religion and Philosophy Collection、PhilPapers、Scopus和Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials,并报告定量和定性结果。我们找到了11项符合纳入标准的研究,并进行了数据提取和综合。确定了五项干预措施,旨在解决HCP良知的各个方面。没有确定旨在支持医疗保健专业人员在实践中理解或使用良心进行道德决策的干预措施。实证和人文研究表明,良心对医疗保健实践至关重要,但良心问题仍然是许多hcp的两极分化经验。因此,需要进行干预和以教育为基础的研究,以支持HCP在实践中对良心的理解和使用。
Effectiveness of interventions on conscience: Findings of a systematic review.
Research indicates that conscience is an asset to healthcare professional's personal and professional practice. However, little work has been done to support healthcare professionals to use and understand their conscience for moral decision-making. Disparity exists between international and national bodies that value conscience for healthcare professionals and the paucity of practice supports available to formally assist healthcare professionals to openly discuss and then navigate their moral decisions arising from their conscience. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of existing interventions aimed at supporting healthcare professionals to understand and use their conscience for healthcare practice. This review was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses. International, interdisciplinary databases including Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, ATLA Religion, Religion and Philosophy Collection, PhilPapers, Scopus and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials were searched and quantitative as well as qualitative outcomes were reported. We found 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction and synthesis. Five interventions were identified that aimed to address aspects of HCP's conscience. No interventions were identified that aim to support healthcare professionals to understand or use their conscience for moral decision-making in practice. Empirical and humanities research indicates that conscience is essential to healthcare practice, but issues of conscience remain a polarizing experience for many HCPs. Intervention and education-based research are therefore needed to support HCP's understanding and use of conscience for practice.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.