整合公众偏好以克服研究中的种族差异:美国一项关于增强对研究数据共享实践的信任的调查结果。

IF 3.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2025-05-02 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031
Stephanie Niño de Rivera, Yihong Zhao, Shalom Omollo, Sarah Eslami, Natalie Benda, Yashika Sharma, Meghan Reading Turchioe, Marianne Sharko, Lydia S Dugdale, Ruth Masterson Creber
{"title":"整合公众偏好以克服研究中的种族差异:美国一项关于增强对研究数据共享实践的信任的调查结果。","authors":"Stephanie Niño de Rivera, Yihong Zhao, Shalom Omollo, Sarah Eslami, Natalie Benda, Yashika Sharma, Meghan Reading Turchioe, Marianne Sharko, Lydia S Dugdale, Ruth Masterson Creber","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Data-sharing policies are rapidly evolving toward increased data sharing. However, participants' perspectives are not well understood and could have an adverse impact on participation in research. We evaluated participants' preferences for sharing specific types of data with specific groups, and strategies to enhance trust in data-sharing practices.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In March 2023, we conducted a nationally representative online survey with 610 US adults and used logistic regression models to assess sociodemographic differences in their willingness to share different types of data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings highlight notable racial disparities in willingness to share research data with external entities, especially health policy and public health organizations. Black participants were significantly less likely to share most health data with public health organizations, including mental health (odds ratio [OR]: 0.543, 95% CI, 0.323-0.895) and sexual health/fertility information (OR: 0.404, 95% CI, 0.228-0.691), compared to White participants. Moreover, 63% of participants expressed that their trust in researchers would improve if given control over the data recipients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participants exhibit reluctance to share specific types of personal research data, emphasizing strong preferences regarding external data access. This highlights the need for a critical reassessment of current data-sharing policies to align with participant concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is imperative for data-sharing policies to integrate diverse patient viewpoints to mitigate risk of distrust and a potential unintended consequence of lower participation among racial and ethnic minority participants in research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"ooaf031"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating public preferences to overcome racial disparities in research: findings from a US survey on enhancing trust in research data-sharing practices.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Niño de Rivera, Yihong Zhao, Shalom Omollo, Sarah Eslami, Natalie Benda, Yashika Sharma, Meghan Reading Turchioe, Marianne Sharko, Lydia S Dugdale, Ruth Masterson Creber\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Data-sharing policies are rapidly evolving toward increased data sharing. However, participants' perspectives are not well understood and could have an adverse impact on participation in research. We evaluated participants' preferences for sharing specific types of data with specific groups, and strategies to enhance trust in data-sharing practices.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In March 2023, we conducted a nationally representative online survey with 610 US adults and used logistic regression models to assess sociodemographic differences in their willingness to share different types of data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings highlight notable racial disparities in willingness to share research data with external entities, especially health policy and public health organizations. Black participants were significantly less likely to share most health data with public health organizations, including mental health (odds ratio [OR]: 0.543, 95% CI, 0.323-0.895) and sexual health/fertility information (OR: 0.404, 95% CI, 0.228-0.691), compared to White participants. Moreover, 63% of participants expressed that their trust in researchers would improve if given control over the data recipients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participants exhibit reluctance to share specific types of personal research data, emphasizing strong preferences regarding external data access. This highlights the need for a critical reassessment of current data-sharing policies to align with participant concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is imperative for data-sharing policies to integrate diverse patient viewpoints to mitigate risk of distrust and a potential unintended consequence of lower participation among racial and ethnic minority participants in research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"ooaf031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047078/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:数据共享政策正朝着增加数据共享的方向迅速发展。然而,参与者的观点没有得到很好的理解,可能对参与研究产生不利影响。我们评估了参与者与特定群体共享特定类型数据的偏好,以及在数据共享实践中增强信任的策略。材料和方法:2023年3月,我们对610名美国成年人进行了一项具有全国代表性的在线调查,并使用逻辑回归模型来评估他们分享不同类型数据的意愿的社会人口统计学差异。结果:我们的研究结果突出了在与外部实体,特别是卫生政策和公共卫生组织共享研究数据的意愿方面存在显著的种族差异。与白人参与者相比,黑人参与者与公共卫生组织分享大多数健康数据的可能性显着降低,包括心理健康(优势比[OR]: 0.543, 95% CI, 0.323-0.895)和性健康/生育信息(OR: 0.404, 95% CI, 0.228-0.691)。此外,63%的参与者表示,如果对数据接收者有控制权,他们对研究人员的信任将会提高。讨论:参与者表现出不愿分享特定类型的个人研究数据,强调对外部数据访问的强烈偏好。这突出表明,有必要对当前的数据共享政策进行重大重新评估,以符合参与者的关切。结论:数据共享政策必须整合不同患者的观点,以减轻不信任的风险,以及少数种族和少数民族参与者参与研究的潜在意外后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Integrating public preferences to overcome racial disparities in research: findings from a US survey on enhancing trust in research data-sharing practices.

Integrating public preferences to overcome racial disparities in research: findings from a US survey on enhancing trust in research data-sharing practices.

Integrating public preferences to overcome racial disparities in research: findings from a US survey on enhancing trust in research data-sharing practices.

Integrating public preferences to overcome racial disparities in research: findings from a US survey on enhancing trust in research data-sharing practices.

Objectives: Data-sharing policies are rapidly evolving toward increased data sharing. However, participants' perspectives are not well understood and could have an adverse impact on participation in research. We evaluated participants' preferences for sharing specific types of data with specific groups, and strategies to enhance trust in data-sharing practices.

Materials and methods: In March 2023, we conducted a nationally representative online survey with 610 US adults and used logistic regression models to assess sociodemographic differences in their willingness to share different types of data.

Results: Our findings highlight notable racial disparities in willingness to share research data with external entities, especially health policy and public health organizations. Black participants were significantly less likely to share most health data with public health organizations, including mental health (odds ratio [OR]: 0.543, 95% CI, 0.323-0.895) and sexual health/fertility information (OR: 0.404, 95% CI, 0.228-0.691), compared to White participants. Moreover, 63% of participants expressed that their trust in researchers would improve if given control over the data recipients.

Discussion: Participants exhibit reluctance to share specific types of personal research data, emphasizing strong preferences regarding external data access. This highlights the need for a critical reassessment of current data-sharing policies to align with participant concerns.

Conclusion: It is imperative for data-sharing policies to integrate diverse patient viewpoints to mitigate risk of distrust and a potential unintended consequence of lower participation among racial and ethnic minority participants in research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信