一种新型铅笔束扫描Bragg峰值FLASH技术在商业处理计划系统中的实现。

Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1002/mp.17876
Alexander Bookbinder, Miriam Krieger, Pierre Lansonneur, Anthony Magliari, Xingyi Zhao, J Isabelle Choi, Charles B Simone, Haibo Lin, Michael Folkerts, Minglei Kang
{"title":"一种新型铅笔束扫描Bragg峰值FLASH技术在商业处理计划系统中的实现。","authors":"Alexander Bookbinder, Miriam Krieger, Pierre Lansonneur, Anthony Magliari, Xingyi Zhao, J Isabelle Choi, Charles B Simone, Haibo Lin, Michael Folkerts, Minglei Kang","doi":"10.1002/mp.17876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultra-high dose rate, or FLASH, radiotherapy has shown promise in preclinical experiments of sparing healthy tissue without compromising tumor control. This \"FLASH effect\" can compound with dosimetric sparing of the proton Bragg peak (BP) using a method called Single Energy Pristine Bragg Peak (SEPBP) FLASH. However, this and other proposed FLASH techniques are constrained by lack of familiar treatment planning systems (TPSs). Creating modules to implement SEPBP FLASH into a commercial TPS opens up the possibility of more widespread investigation of FLASH and lays the groundwork for future clinical translation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To implement, investigate, and benchmark the capacity of a commercial TPS research extension for BP FLASH SBRT treatment planning by studying the dosimetric properties and FLASH ratio for critical organs-at-risk (OARs) at several sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 250 MeV clinical proton beam model was commissioned in the Eclipse TPS (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA). BP FLASH fields were single-layer maximum-energy beams with a universal range shifter (URS) and field-specific range compensators (RCs). RCs for each beam angle were included as contours within the structure set, while the URS was modeled in the PBS beamline. Spotmaps were created using Lloyd's algorithm with minimum monitor units (MU)-based spacing to ensure plan quality and preserve FLASH coverage for critical OARs. Inverse optimization while preserving minimum MU constraints was done with scorecard-based optimization. Fifteen SBRT cases from three anatomical sites (liver, lung, base-of-skull [BOS]) previously treated at the New York Proton Center were re-optimized using this method, and dosimetric characteristics of BP plans were compared to clinically treated plans. FLASH ratios for critical OARs were evaluated for BP FLASH plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dose distributions, including target uniformity, conformity index (CI), and DVHs, showed no significant difference in clinically-used metrics between BP FLASH and clinically delivered plans across all anatomical sites. Mean 40 Gy/s FLASH ratios for critical OARs were above 84% for all but one OAR with 2 Gy threshold and above 98% for all OARs with 5 Gy threshold. D<sub>max</sub> for liver and BOS cases was 111.3 ± 2.68 and 112.88 ± 1.29, respectively, and D<sub>2%</sub> for lung cases was 112.04 ± 1.09. All D<sub>max</sub> remained below 115%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inverse planning using a single-energy BP FLASH technique based on sparse spots and ultra-high minimum MU/spot can achieve intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT)-equivalent quality and sufficient FLASH coverage. This successful prototype brings us closer to commercial implementation and may increase the availability of proton FLASH dosimetry studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a novel pencil beam scanning Bragg peak FLASH technique to a commercial treatment planning system.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Bookbinder, Miriam Krieger, Pierre Lansonneur, Anthony Magliari, Xingyi Zhao, J Isabelle Choi, Charles B Simone, Haibo Lin, Michael Folkerts, Minglei Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.17876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultra-high dose rate, or FLASH, radiotherapy has shown promise in preclinical experiments of sparing healthy tissue without compromising tumor control. This \\\"FLASH effect\\\" can compound with dosimetric sparing of the proton Bragg peak (BP) using a method called Single Energy Pristine Bragg Peak (SEPBP) FLASH. However, this and other proposed FLASH techniques are constrained by lack of familiar treatment planning systems (TPSs). Creating modules to implement SEPBP FLASH into a commercial TPS opens up the possibility of more widespread investigation of FLASH and lays the groundwork for future clinical translation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To implement, investigate, and benchmark the capacity of a commercial TPS research extension for BP FLASH SBRT treatment planning by studying the dosimetric properties and FLASH ratio for critical organs-at-risk (OARs) at several sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 250 MeV clinical proton beam model was commissioned in the Eclipse TPS (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA). BP FLASH fields were single-layer maximum-energy beams with a universal range shifter (URS) and field-specific range compensators (RCs). RCs for each beam angle were included as contours within the structure set, while the URS was modeled in the PBS beamline. Spotmaps were created using Lloyd's algorithm with minimum monitor units (MU)-based spacing to ensure plan quality and preserve FLASH coverage for critical OARs. Inverse optimization while preserving minimum MU constraints was done with scorecard-based optimization. Fifteen SBRT cases from three anatomical sites (liver, lung, base-of-skull [BOS]) previously treated at the New York Proton Center were re-optimized using this method, and dosimetric characteristics of BP plans were compared to clinically treated plans. FLASH ratios for critical OARs were evaluated for BP FLASH plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dose distributions, including target uniformity, conformity index (CI), and DVHs, showed no significant difference in clinically-used metrics between BP FLASH and clinically delivered plans across all anatomical sites. Mean 40 Gy/s FLASH ratios for critical OARs were above 84% for all but one OAR with 2 Gy threshold and above 98% for all OARs with 5 Gy threshold. D<sub>max</sub> for liver and BOS cases was 111.3 ± 2.68 and 112.88 ± 1.29, respectively, and D<sub>2%</sub> for lung cases was 112.04 ± 1.09. All D<sub>max</sub> remained below 115%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inverse planning using a single-energy BP FLASH technique based on sparse spots and ultra-high minimum MU/spot can achieve intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT)-equivalent quality and sufficient FLASH coverage. This successful prototype brings us closer to commercial implementation and may increase the availability of proton FLASH dosimetry studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超高剂量率放疗在不影响肿瘤控制的情况下保留健康组织的临床前实验中显示出前景。这种“闪光效应”可以与质子布拉格峰(BP)的剂量节约相结合,使用一种称为单能量原始布拉格峰(SEPBP)闪光的方法。然而,这种和其他提出的FLASH技术由于缺乏熟悉的治疗计划系统(tps)而受到限制。创建模块将SEPBP FLASH应用到商业TPS中,为更广泛地研究FLASH提供了可能性,并为未来的临床翻译奠定了基础。目的:通过研究几个地点关键危险器官(OARs)的剂量学特性和闪光比,实施、调查和基准测试BP FLASH SBRT治疗计划的商业TPS研究扩展的能力。方法:250mev临床质子束模型在Eclipse TPS (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA)投入使用。BP FLASH场是带有通用距离移器(URS)和场特异性距离补偿器(rc)的单层最大能量光束。每个波束角度的RCs作为轮廓线包含在结构集中,而URS在PBS波束线中建模。spotmap采用Lloyd's算法,以最小监测单元(MU)为基础的间距创建,以确保规划质量,并保持关键桨的FLASH覆盖范围。在保持最小MU约束的情况下,通过基于记分卡的优化实现逆向优化。采用该方法对在纽约质子中心治疗过的来自三个解剖部位(肝、肺、颅底[BOS])的15例SBRT进行再优化,并将BP方案与临床治疗方案的剂量学特征进行比较。评估BP FLASH计划中关键桨的FLASH比率。结果:剂量分布,包括靶均匀性、符合性指数(CI)和dvh,显示BP FLASH和临床交付方案在所有解剖部位的临床使用指标无显著差异。临界值为2 Gy的临界桨的平均40 Gy/s闪速比在84%以上,临界值为5 Gy的临界桨的平均40 Gy/s闪速比在98%以上。肝脏和BOS的Dmax分别为111.3±2.68和112.88±1.29,肺部的Dmax为112.04±1.09。所有Dmax均低于115%。结论:基于稀疏斑点和超高最小MU/spot的单能量BP FLASH技术逆规划可实现等效质量的调强质子治疗(IMPT)和足够的FLASH覆盖。这个成功的原型使我们更接近商业应用,并可能增加质子闪光剂量学研究的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a novel pencil beam scanning Bragg peak FLASH technique to a commercial treatment planning system.

Background: Ultra-high dose rate, or FLASH, radiotherapy has shown promise in preclinical experiments of sparing healthy tissue without compromising tumor control. This "FLASH effect" can compound with dosimetric sparing of the proton Bragg peak (BP) using a method called Single Energy Pristine Bragg Peak (SEPBP) FLASH. However, this and other proposed FLASH techniques are constrained by lack of familiar treatment planning systems (TPSs). Creating modules to implement SEPBP FLASH into a commercial TPS opens up the possibility of more widespread investigation of FLASH and lays the groundwork for future clinical translation.

Purpose: To implement, investigate, and benchmark the capacity of a commercial TPS research extension for BP FLASH SBRT treatment planning by studying the dosimetric properties and FLASH ratio for critical organs-at-risk (OARs) at several sites.

Methods: A 250 MeV clinical proton beam model was commissioned in the Eclipse TPS (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA). BP FLASH fields were single-layer maximum-energy beams with a universal range shifter (URS) and field-specific range compensators (RCs). RCs for each beam angle were included as contours within the structure set, while the URS was modeled in the PBS beamline. Spotmaps were created using Lloyd's algorithm with minimum monitor units (MU)-based spacing to ensure plan quality and preserve FLASH coverage for critical OARs. Inverse optimization while preserving minimum MU constraints was done with scorecard-based optimization. Fifteen SBRT cases from three anatomical sites (liver, lung, base-of-skull [BOS]) previously treated at the New York Proton Center were re-optimized using this method, and dosimetric characteristics of BP plans were compared to clinically treated plans. FLASH ratios for critical OARs were evaluated for BP FLASH plans.

Results: The dose distributions, including target uniformity, conformity index (CI), and DVHs, showed no significant difference in clinically-used metrics between BP FLASH and clinically delivered plans across all anatomical sites. Mean 40 Gy/s FLASH ratios for critical OARs were above 84% for all but one OAR with 2 Gy threshold and above 98% for all OARs with 5 Gy threshold. Dmax for liver and BOS cases was 111.3 ± 2.68 and 112.88 ± 1.29, respectively, and D2% for lung cases was 112.04 ± 1.09. All Dmax remained below 115%.

Conclusions: Inverse planning using a single-energy BP FLASH technique based on sparse spots and ultra-high minimum MU/spot can achieve intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT)-equivalent quality and sufficient FLASH coverage. This successful prototype brings us closer to commercial implementation and may increase the availability of proton FLASH dosimetry studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信