志愿服务作为老年人抑郁的可改变决定因素:对LongROAD研究的评论。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Gokhan Koker
{"title":"志愿服务作为老年人抑郁的可改变决定因素:对LongROAD研究的评论。","authors":"Gokhan Koker","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with great interest the article by Xi and colleagues, “Prevalence of Depression in Older Adults and the Potential Protective Role of Volunteering: Findings From the LongROAD Study,” recently published in the <i>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</i> [<span>1</span>]. The authors found that 6.2% of community-dwelling older adults aged 65–79 years had depression and that volunteering was associated with significantly reduced odds of depression (adjusted OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40–0.81).</p><p>We commend the authors for identifying volunteering as a potentially modifiable protective factor. However, we would like to offer several points to further contextualize their findings.</p><p>The cross-sectional design limits causal interpretation. Longitudinal studies are needed to distinguish whether volunteering actively reduces depression or whether individuals with better mental health are more inclined to volunteer [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Secondly, the mediating mechanisms through which volunteering impacts mental health—such as social connectedness, role identity, and cognitive engagement—were not explored and deserve further investigation [<span>3, 4</span>].</p><p>Disparities in access to volunteering opportunities across sociodemographic groups (e.g., income, education) may confound these associations. Prior research suggests selection processes significantly influence both volunteering behaviors and their mental health outcomes [<span>5</span>].</p><p>Finally, while the PROMIS Depression scale is valid, incorporating geriatric-specific instruments such as the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) would enhance sensitivity in older populations [<span>6</span>].</p><p>In summary, this study highlights a promising avenue for psychosocial intervention in aging populations. We support further longitudinal and mechanistic work to better understand how volunteerism can be leveraged as a strategy to reduce late-life depression.</p><p>The author is solely responsible for the conception, drafting, and revision of this letter.</p><p>The author has nothing to report.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 8","pages":"2627-2628"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19517","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volunteering as a Modifiable Determinant of Depression in Older Adults: Comments on the LongROAD Study\",\"authors\":\"Gokhan Koker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We read with great interest the article by Xi and colleagues, “Prevalence of Depression in Older Adults and the Potential Protective Role of Volunteering: Findings From the LongROAD Study,” recently published in the <i>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</i> [<span>1</span>]. The authors found that 6.2% of community-dwelling older adults aged 65–79 years had depression and that volunteering was associated with significantly reduced odds of depression (adjusted OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40–0.81).</p><p>We commend the authors for identifying volunteering as a potentially modifiable protective factor. However, we would like to offer several points to further contextualize their findings.</p><p>The cross-sectional design limits causal interpretation. Longitudinal studies are needed to distinguish whether volunteering actively reduces depression or whether individuals with better mental health are more inclined to volunteer [<span>2</span>].</p><p>Secondly, the mediating mechanisms through which volunteering impacts mental health—such as social connectedness, role identity, and cognitive engagement—were not explored and deserve further investigation [<span>3, 4</span>].</p><p>Disparities in access to volunteering opportunities across sociodemographic groups (e.g., income, education) may confound these associations. Prior research suggests selection processes significantly influence both volunteering behaviors and their mental health outcomes [<span>5</span>].</p><p>Finally, while the PROMIS Depression scale is valid, incorporating geriatric-specific instruments such as the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) would enhance sensitivity in older populations [<span>6</span>].</p><p>In summary, this study highlights a promising avenue for psychosocial intervention in aging populations. We support further longitudinal and mechanistic work to better understand how volunteerism can be leveraged as a strategy to reduce late-life depression.</p><p>The author is solely responsible for the conception, drafting, and revision of this letter.</p><p>The author has nothing to report.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"73 8\",\"pages\":\"2627-2628\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19517\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19517\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Xi和他的同事最近发表在《美国老年病学学会杂志》上的文章《老年人抑郁症的患病率和志愿服务的潜在保护作用:来自LongROAD研究的发现》。作者发现6.2%的65-79岁的社区老年人患有抑郁症,志愿服务与显著降低抑郁症的几率相关(调整OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40-0.81)。我们赞扬作者将志愿活动确定为一个潜在的可改变的保护因素。然而,我们想提出几点来进一步说明他们的发现。横断面设计限制了因果解释。需要进行纵向研究,以区分志愿活动是积极减少抑郁,还是心理健康状况较好的人更倾向于志愿活动。其次,志愿服务影响心理健康的中介机制(如社会联系、角色认同和认知参与)尚未被探索,值得进一步研究[3,4]。不同社会人口群体(如收入、教育)在获得志愿服务机会方面的差异可能会混淆这些关联。先前的研究表明,选择过程对志愿者行为和心理健康结果都有显著影响。最后,虽然PROMIS抑郁量表是有效的,但纳入老年抑郁症量表(GDS)等老年特定工具将提高老年人群的敏感性[10]。总之,这项研究强调了在老龄化人群中进行社会心理干预的一个有希望的途径。我们支持进一步的纵向和机械工作,以更好地了解如何利用志愿服务作为减少晚年抑郁症的策略。作者全权负责本信函的构思、起草和修订。作者没有什么可报道的。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Volunteering as a Modifiable Determinant of Depression in Older Adults: Comments on the LongROAD Study

Volunteering as a Modifiable Determinant of Depression in Older Adults: Comments on the LongROAD Study

Volunteering as a Modifiable Determinant of Depression in Older Adults: Comments on the LongROAD Study

Volunteering as a Modifiable Determinant of Depression in Older Adults: Comments on the LongROAD Study

We read with great interest the article by Xi and colleagues, “Prevalence of Depression in Older Adults and the Potential Protective Role of Volunteering: Findings From the LongROAD Study,” recently published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [1]. The authors found that 6.2% of community-dwelling older adults aged 65–79 years had depression and that volunteering was associated with significantly reduced odds of depression (adjusted OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40–0.81).

We commend the authors for identifying volunteering as a potentially modifiable protective factor. However, we would like to offer several points to further contextualize their findings.

The cross-sectional design limits causal interpretation. Longitudinal studies are needed to distinguish whether volunteering actively reduces depression or whether individuals with better mental health are more inclined to volunteer [2].

Secondly, the mediating mechanisms through which volunteering impacts mental health—such as social connectedness, role identity, and cognitive engagement—were not explored and deserve further investigation [3, 4].

Disparities in access to volunteering opportunities across sociodemographic groups (e.g., income, education) may confound these associations. Prior research suggests selection processes significantly influence both volunteering behaviors and their mental health outcomes [5].

Finally, while the PROMIS Depression scale is valid, incorporating geriatric-specific instruments such as the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) would enhance sensitivity in older populations [6].

In summary, this study highlights a promising avenue for psychosocial intervention in aging populations. We support further longitudinal and mechanistic work to better understand how volunteerism can be leveraged as a strategy to reduce late-life depression.

The author is solely responsible for the conception, drafting, and revision of this letter.

The author has nothing to report.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信