感染病例后的感染风险。

Sean Baran, Rishikesan Ramaesh, Alexander Y Shin, Sanjeev Kakar
{"title":"感染病例后的感染风险。","authors":"Sean Baran, Rishikesan Ramaesh, Alexander Y Shin, Sanjeev Kakar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Controversy exists whether one can perform a clean case subsequent to a dirty case in the same operating room predisposed to infection. A retrospective review of all orthopaedic surgical patients between 2003 and 2010 with a type I surgical wound whose case had been performed immediately after type a IV wound was undertaken. Six hundred seventy-four pairs of type IV wounds immediately followed by type I wounds were identified. Of the type I wounds, 3.3% subsequently developed surgical site infection. The bacterial profile of the infections in type I cases was not identical to the associated type IV cases in any instance. This finding suggests that direct cross-contamination is not a reason for infection in clean cases that are performed immediately subsequent to dirty cases. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 34(1):026-030, 2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"34 1","pages":"26-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infection Risk Following Contaminated Cases.\",\"authors\":\"Sean Baran, Rishikesan Ramaesh, Alexander Y Shin, Sanjeev Kakar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Controversy exists whether one can perform a clean case subsequent to a dirty case in the same operating room predisposed to infection. A retrospective review of all orthopaedic surgical patients between 2003 and 2010 with a type I surgical wound whose case had been performed immediately after type a IV wound was undertaken. Six hundred seventy-four pairs of type IV wounds immediately followed by type I wounds were identified. Of the type I wounds, 3.3% subsequently developed surgical site infection. The bacterial profile of the infections in type I cases was not identical to the associated type IV cases in any instance. This finding suggests that direct cross-contamination is not a reason for infection in clean cases that are performed immediately subsequent to dirty cases. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 34(1):026-030, 2025).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"26-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

是否可以在一个容易感染的脏病例之后在同一个手术室里进行一个干净的病例,这是存在争议的。回顾性分析了2003年至2010年间所有I型外科伤口患者,这些患者在IV型伤口后立即进行手术。674对IV型伤口紧随其后的是I型伤口。在I型伤口中,3.3%随后发生手术部位感染。在任何情况下,I型病例感染的细菌谱与相关的IV型病例不相同。这一发现表明,在不洁病例之后立即进行的清洁病例中,直接交叉污染不是感染的原因。[j] .外科骨科进展,34(1):026- 030,2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Infection Risk Following Contaminated Cases.

Controversy exists whether one can perform a clean case subsequent to a dirty case in the same operating room predisposed to infection. A retrospective review of all orthopaedic surgical patients between 2003 and 2010 with a type I surgical wound whose case had been performed immediately after type a IV wound was undertaken. Six hundred seventy-four pairs of type IV wounds immediately followed by type I wounds were identified. Of the type I wounds, 3.3% subsequently developed surgical site infection. The bacterial profile of the infections in type I cases was not identical to the associated type IV cases in any instance. This finding suggests that direct cross-contamination is not a reason for infection in clean cases that are performed immediately subsequent to dirty cases. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 34(1):026-030, 2025).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信