为多发性硬化症患者建立在线正念干预措施的关键知识用户的实施考虑。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Ashvene Sureshkumar, Dorothy Luong, Sarah Munce, Mark Bayley, Monika Kastner, Jillian Scandiffio, Nanette Lai, Gregory Feng, Jiwon Oh, Andrea D Furlan, Abhimanyu Sud, Anthony Feinstein, Robert Simpson
{"title":"为多发性硬化症患者建立在线正念干预措施的关键知识用户的实施考虑。","authors":"Ashvene Sureshkumar, Dorothy Luong, Sarah Munce, Mark Bayley, Monika Kastner, Jillian Scandiffio, Nanette Lai, Gregory Feng, Jiwon Oh, Andrea D Furlan, Abhimanyu Sud, Anthony Feinstein, Robert Simpson","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2492312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) can effectively reduce stress in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Online MBIs address access barriers, but large-scale implementation from the perspectives of key knowledge users remains understudied. This study explored the implementation considerations of PwMS, care partners, MS clinicians and MBI instructors for building online MBIs for PwMS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive design with an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach. Virtual semi-structured interviews explored the perspectives of PwMS (<i>n</i> = 10), care partners (<i>n</i> = 3), MS clinicians (<i>n</i> = 8), and MBI instructors (<i>n</i> = 8). An inductive thematic analysis approach was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: (1) daily mindfulness: structuring and conceptualizing mindfulness for PwMS, (2) unlocking access through enhanced clinician awareness and advocacy: building pathways to MBIs for PwMS, (3) validating mindfulness experiences: the importance of MBI group composition and instructor interactions for PwMS, and (4) sustained engagement: resources to create and navigate MBIs for PwMS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PwMS valued diverse participant groups and control over tailoring MBIs to their needs. However, guidance from a clinician may be needed to foster self-agency for PwMS. MBIs serve a multifaceted role for PwMS, extending beyond the diagnosis. Shared decision-making amongst knowledge users can enhance flexible programming of online MBIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation considerations of key knowledge users for building online mindfulness-based interventions for people with multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Ashvene Sureshkumar, Dorothy Luong, Sarah Munce, Mark Bayley, Monika Kastner, Jillian Scandiffio, Nanette Lai, Gregory Feng, Jiwon Oh, Andrea D Furlan, Abhimanyu Sud, Anthony Feinstein, Robert Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2492312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) can effectively reduce stress in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Online MBIs address access barriers, but large-scale implementation from the perspectives of key knowledge users remains understudied. This study explored the implementation considerations of PwMS, care partners, MS clinicians and MBI instructors for building online MBIs for PwMS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive design with an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach. Virtual semi-structured interviews explored the perspectives of PwMS (<i>n</i> = 10), care partners (<i>n</i> = 3), MS clinicians (<i>n</i> = 8), and MBI instructors (<i>n</i> = 8). An inductive thematic analysis approach was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: (1) daily mindfulness: structuring and conceptualizing mindfulness for PwMS, (2) unlocking access through enhanced clinician awareness and advocacy: building pathways to MBIs for PwMS, (3) validating mindfulness experiences: the importance of MBI group composition and instructor interactions for PwMS, and (4) sustained engagement: resources to create and navigate MBIs for PwMS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PwMS valued diverse participant groups and control over tailoring MBIs to their needs. However, guidance from a clinician may be needed to foster self-agency for PwMS. MBIs serve a multifaceted role for PwMS, extending beyond the diagnosis. Shared decision-making amongst knowledge users can enhance flexible programming of online MBIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2492312\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2492312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:正念干预(MBIs)可以有效地减轻多发性硬化症(PwMS)患者的压力。在线mbi解决了访问障碍,但从关键知识用户的角度来看,大规模实施仍未得到充分研究。本研究探讨了PwMS、护理伙伴、MS临床医生和MBI讲师在为PwMS建立在线MBI时的实施考虑。材料与方法:采用综合知识翻译(iKT)方法的定性描述性设计。虚拟半结构化访谈探讨了PwMS (n = 10)、护理伙伴(n = 3)、MS临床医生(n = 8)和MBI讲师(n = 8)的观点。采用归纳主题分析方法。结果:确定了四个主题:(1)日常正念:为PwMS构建和概念化正念;(2)通过增强临床医生的意识和倡导来打开通道:为PwMS建立MBIs的途径;(3)验证正念体验:MBI小组组成和教师互动对PwMS的重要性;(4)持续参与:为PwMS创建和导航MBIs的资源。结论:PwMS重视不同的参与者群体,并控制定制MBIs以满足他们的需求。然而,可能需要临床医生的指导来培养PwMS的自我能动性。mbi在PwMS中扮演着多方面的角色,不仅仅是诊断。知识使用者之间的共享决策可以增强在线MBIs的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation considerations of key knowledge users for building online mindfulness-based interventions for people with multiple sclerosis.

Purpose: Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) can effectively reduce stress in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Online MBIs address access barriers, but large-scale implementation from the perspectives of key knowledge users remains understudied. This study explored the implementation considerations of PwMS, care partners, MS clinicians and MBI instructors for building online MBIs for PwMS.

Materials and methods: A qualitative descriptive design with an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach. Virtual semi-structured interviews explored the perspectives of PwMS (n = 10), care partners (n = 3), MS clinicians (n = 8), and MBI instructors (n = 8). An inductive thematic analysis approach was used.

Results: Four themes were identified: (1) daily mindfulness: structuring and conceptualizing mindfulness for PwMS, (2) unlocking access through enhanced clinician awareness and advocacy: building pathways to MBIs for PwMS, (3) validating mindfulness experiences: the importance of MBI group composition and instructor interactions for PwMS, and (4) sustained engagement: resources to create and navigate MBIs for PwMS.

Conclusions: PwMS valued diverse participant groups and control over tailoring MBIs to their needs. However, guidance from a clinician may be needed to foster self-agency for PwMS. MBIs serve a multifaceted role for PwMS, extending beyond the diagnosis. Shared decision-making amongst knowledge users can enhance flexible programming of online MBIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信