医学辅助生殖治疗过程的结束:医疗保健专业人员观点的定性研究。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Federica Bonazza, Lidia Borghi, Sara Molgora, Elena Vegni, Daniela Leone
{"title":"医学辅助生殖治疗过程的结束:医疗保健专业人员观点的定性研究。","authors":"Federica Bonazza, Lidia Borghi, Sara Molgora, Elena Vegni, Daniela Leone","doi":"10.1080/26410397.2025.2494412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the medically assisted reproduction (MAR) pathway, one of the most complex phases is the end of the treatment. Unlike other medical contexts, there is no biological endpoint in the MAR setting. This absence makes the decision to end MAR treatment extremely challenging for both patients and healthcare professionals. Accordingly, our research aimed to examine the process related to the end of MAR treatment, as devised by healthcare professionals. Our sample included physicians, biologists, and psychologists aged <i>≥</i>18 years with specialised training in assisted reproduction. Data were collected through four focus groups (in February-May 2023), focusing on the topic of the end of treatment (EoT) and its definition. Data were collected and analysed according to the principles of Grounded Theory. The findings shed light on the attributes and components related to the end of the treatment process. The central category \"the end of treatment\" consists of a definition of what is considered the end of treatment and the associated decision-making process. In the phase leading up to the EoT, the process is influenced by contextual and proximal factors, which interact and influence each other. To cope with and manage the EoT, healthcare providers adopt spontaneous strategies that lead to positive or negative outcomes. End-of-treatment management is a key facet of clinical practice. This contribution increased knowledge about EoT and highlighted healthcare professionals' perspectives, which should be considered for the implementation of best practice points and respect for patients' rights to the highest attainable standard of mental and physical health.</p>","PeriodicalId":37074,"journal":{"name":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","volume":" ","pages":"2494412"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The end-of-treatment process in medically assisted reproduction: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' views.\",\"authors\":\"Federica Bonazza, Lidia Borghi, Sara Molgora, Elena Vegni, Daniela Leone\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26410397.2025.2494412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the medically assisted reproduction (MAR) pathway, one of the most complex phases is the end of the treatment. Unlike other medical contexts, there is no biological endpoint in the MAR setting. This absence makes the decision to end MAR treatment extremely challenging for both patients and healthcare professionals. Accordingly, our research aimed to examine the process related to the end of MAR treatment, as devised by healthcare professionals. Our sample included physicians, biologists, and psychologists aged <i>≥</i>18 years with specialised training in assisted reproduction. Data were collected through four focus groups (in February-May 2023), focusing on the topic of the end of treatment (EoT) and its definition. Data were collected and analysed according to the principles of Grounded Theory. The findings shed light on the attributes and components related to the end of the treatment process. The central category \\\"the end of treatment\\\" consists of a definition of what is considered the end of treatment and the associated decision-making process. In the phase leading up to the EoT, the process is influenced by contextual and proximal factors, which interact and influence each other. To cope with and manage the EoT, healthcare providers adopt spontaneous strategies that lead to positive or negative outcomes. End-of-treatment management is a key facet of clinical practice. This contribution increased knowledge about EoT and highlighted healthcare professionals' perspectives, which should be considered for the implementation of best practice points and respect for patients' rights to the highest attainable standard of mental and physical health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2494412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086948/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2494412\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2494412","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在医学辅助生殖(MAR)途径中,最复杂的阶段之一是治疗的结束。与其他医学环境不同,在MAR环境中没有生物学终点。这种缺失使得决定结束MAR治疗对患者和医疗保健专业人员都极具挑战性。因此,我们的研究旨在检查由医疗保健专业人员设计的与MAR治疗结束相关的过程。我们的样本包括医生、生物学家和心理学家,年龄≥18岁,接受过辅助生殖方面的专门培训。数据通过四个焦点小组收集[在2023年2月至5月],重点关注治疗结束(EoT)及其定义的主题。根据扎根理论的原则收集和分析数据。这些发现揭示了与治疗过程结束有关的属性和组成部分。中心类别“治疗结束”包括对什么是治疗结束的定义以及相关的决策过程。在导致EoT的阶段,该过程受到上下文因素和近端因素的影响,它们相互作用并相互影响。为了应对和管理EoT,医疗保健提供者采用导致积极或消极结果的自发策略。治疗末期管理是临床实践的一个关键方面。这一贡献增加了关于门诊治疗的知识,并突出了医疗保健专业人员的观点,在实施最佳实践点和尊重患者享有可达到的最高身心健康标准的权利时,应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The end-of-treatment process in medically assisted reproduction: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' views.

In the medically assisted reproduction (MAR) pathway, one of the most complex phases is the end of the treatment. Unlike other medical contexts, there is no biological endpoint in the MAR setting. This absence makes the decision to end MAR treatment extremely challenging for both patients and healthcare professionals. Accordingly, our research aimed to examine the process related to the end of MAR treatment, as devised by healthcare professionals. Our sample included physicians, biologists, and psychologists aged 18 years with specialised training in assisted reproduction. Data were collected through four focus groups (in February-May 2023), focusing on the topic of the end of treatment (EoT) and its definition. Data were collected and analysed according to the principles of Grounded Theory. The findings shed light on the attributes and components related to the end of the treatment process. The central category "the end of treatment" consists of a definition of what is considered the end of treatment and the associated decision-making process. In the phase leading up to the EoT, the process is influenced by contextual and proximal factors, which interact and influence each other. To cope with and manage the EoT, healthcare providers adopt spontaneous strategies that lead to positive or negative outcomes. End-of-treatment management is a key facet of clinical practice. This contribution increased knowledge about EoT and highlighted healthcare professionals' perspectives, which should be considered for the implementation of best practice points and respect for patients' rights to the highest attainable standard of mental and physical health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: SRHM is a multidisciplinary journal, welcoming submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, behavioural science, public health, human rights and law. The journal welcomes a range of methodological approaches, including qualitative and quantitative analyses such as policy analysis; mixed methods approaches to public health and health systems research; economic, political and historical analysis; and epidemiological work with a focus on SRHR. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based and other forms of interpersonal violence, young people, gender, sexuality, sexual rights and sexual pleasure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信