用改进的德尔菲问卷重塑光化性角化病的治疗范式。

Thomas Dirschka, Marco Ardigò, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Carla Ferrándiz-Pulido, Yolanda Gilaberte, Ina Hadshiew, Ketty Peris, Rolf-Markus Szeimies
{"title":"用改进的德尔菲问卷重塑光化性角化病的治疗范式。","authors":"Thomas Dirschka, Marco Ardigò, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Carla Ferrándiz-Pulido, Yolanda Gilaberte, Ina Hadshiew, Ketty Peris, Rolf-Markus Szeimies","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2025.2487657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Actinic keratosis (AK) is the main precursor of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Since it is impossible to predict which lesions will progress to cSCC, early treatment of AK is crucial. Although AK treatments are effective, some are associated with local skin reactions that may impact treatment compliance and effectiveness. The aim of this modified Delphi study was to review the efficacy and safety of the different AK treatments, gain an understanding of the dermatologists' perspectives on their use, and provide guidelines for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This document corresponds to a modified Delphi consensus survey, based on a literature review and a single round of questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Delphi questionnaire was completed by 73 dermatologists from Germany, Italy, and Spain. Agreement was achieved for 78% of statements, while 11% showed discrepancies or were rejected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key findings emphasize the importance of patient-centered approaches and treatment attributes beyond efficacy (e.g. tolerability or adherence). Understanding the mechanisms of action of treatments is vital for managing patients' and clinicians' expectations and optimizing outcomes. Alternative strategies for evaluating efficacy, including the Actinic Keratosis Area and Severity Index (AKASI) score and lesion reduction from baseline, were also highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"36 1","pages":"2487657"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reshaping treatment paradigm in actinic keratosis by using a modified Delphi questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Dirschka, Marco Ardigò, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Carla Ferrándiz-Pulido, Yolanda Gilaberte, Ina Hadshiew, Ketty Peris, Rolf-Markus Szeimies\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2025.2487657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Actinic keratosis (AK) is the main precursor of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Since it is impossible to predict which lesions will progress to cSCC, early treatment of AK is crucial. Although AK treatments are effective, some are associated with local skin reactions that may impact treatment compliance and effectiveness. The aim of this modified Delphi study was to review the efficacy and safety of the different AK treatments, gain an understanding of the dermatologists' perspectives on their use, and provide guidelines for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This document corresponds to a modified Delphi consensus survey, based on a literature review and a single round of questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Delphi questionnaire was completed by 73 dermatologists from Germany, Italy, and Spain. Agreement was achieved for 78% of statements, while 11% showed discrepancies or were rejected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key findings emphasize the importance of patient-centered approaches and treatment attributes beyond efficacy (e.g. tolerability or adherence). Understanding the mechanisms of action of treatments is vital for managing patients' and clinicians' expectations and optimizing outcomes. Alternative strategies for evaluating efficacy, including the Actinic Keratosis Area and Severity Index (AKASI) score and lesion reduction from baseline, were also highlighted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"2487657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2487657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2487657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:光化性角化病(AK)是侵袭性皮肤鳞状细胞癌(cSCC)的主要前兆。由于无法预测哪些病变会发展为cSCC,因此及早治疗AK至关重要。虽然AK治疗是有效的,但一些与局部皮肤反应有关,可能影响治疗的依从性和有效性。本改良德尔菲研究的目的是回顾不同AK疗法的疗效和安全性,了解皮肤科医生对其使用的看法,并为临床实践提供指导。材料和方法:本文是基于文献综述和单轮问卷调查的修正德尔菲共识调查。结果:来自德国、意大利和西班牙的73名皮肤科医生完成了德尔菲问卷。78%的陈述是一致的,而11%的陈述存在差异或被拒绝。结论:关键发现强调了以患者为中心的方法和疗效以外的治疗属性(如耐受性或依从性)的重要性。了解治疗的作用机制对于管理患者和临床医生的期望和优化结果至关重要。评估疗效的替代策略,包括光化性角化面积和严重程度指数(AKASI)评分和从基线开始的病变减少,也被强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reshaping treatment paradigm in actinic keratosis by using a modified Delphi questionnaire.

Purpose: Actinic keratosis (AK) is the main precursor of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Since it is impossible to predict which lesions will progress to cSCC, early treatment of AK is crucial. Although AK treatments are effective, some are associated with local skin reactions that may impact treatment compliance and effectiveness. The aim of this modified Delphi study was to review the efficacy and safety of the different AK treatments, gain an understanding of the dermatologists' perspectives on their use, and provide guidelines for clinical practice.

Materials and methods: This document corresponds to a modified Delphi consensus survey, based on a literature review and a single round of questionnaire.

Results: The Delphi questionnaire was completed by 73 dermatologists from Germany, Italy, and Spain. Agreement was achieved for 78% of statements, while 11% showed discrepancies or were rejected.

Conclusions: Key findings emphasize the importance of patient-centered approaches and treatment attributes beyond efficacy (e.g. tolerability or adherence). Understanding the mechanisms of action of treatments is vital for managing patients' and clinicians' expectations and optimizing outcomes. Alternative strategies for evaluating efficacy, including the Actinic Keratosis Area and Severity Index (AKASI) score and lesion reduction from baseline, were also highlighted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信