牙槽骨移植在腭裂患者中的应用:两部分回顾性和前瞻性可行性研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ria Shah , Rhodri Davies , Nadeem Saeed , Caroline Mills
{"title":"牙槽骨移植在腭裂患者中的应用:两部分回顾性和前瞻性可行性研究。","authors":"Ria Shah ,&nbsp;Rhodri Davies ,&nbsp;Nadeem Saeed ,&nbsp;Caroline Mills","doi":"10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is an essential procedure for the treatment of cleft alveolus and palate defects, promoting maxillary continuity, dental eruption, functional rehabilitation, and symmetrical facial development. Traditionally performed as an inpatient procedure due to pain management concerns, recent efforts have explored its feasibility as day-case surgery. A two-phase study was conducted. First, a retrospective analysis of 12 ABG cases (July 2023–February 2024) evaluated postoperative pain management and feasibility. This was followed by a prospective pilot study involving 17 patients (March–August 2024), who underwent ABG as day cases under a structured protocol. Pain scores, analgesic requirements, and patient/parent feedback were recorded and analysed. The retrospective analysis concluded that effective pain control was achieved with oral analgesia within six hours postoperatively. In the prospective cohort, mean pain scores were 2.2/10 for the oral site and 2.5/10 for the hip donor site, managed with oral paracetamol and ibuprofen, with minimal opioid use (&lt;30%). No significant complications were reported. Transitioning to day-case ABG reduced bed shortage-related cancellations and was preferred by patients. Day-case ABG is a feasible and safe alternative to inpatient care when strict selection criteria and structured protocols are implemented. This approach optimises resource utilisation, minimises cancellations, and enhances patient satisfaction. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings and facilitate broader implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55318,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"63 5","pages":"Pages 385-392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Day-case alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients: a two-part retrospective and prospective feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"Ria Shah ,&nbsp;Rhodri Davies ,&nbsp;Nadeem Saeed ,&nbsp;Caroline Mills\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is an essential procedure for the treatment of cleft alveolus and palate defects, promoting maxillary continuity, dental eruption, functional rehabilitation, and symmetrical facial development. Traditionally performed as an inpatient procedure due to pain management concerns, recent efforts have explored its feasibility as day-case surgery. A two-phase study was conducted. First, a retrospective analysis of 12 ABG cases (July 2023–February 2024) evaluated postoperative pain management and feasibility. This was followed by a prospective pilot study involving 17 patients (March–August 2024), who underwent ABG as day cases under a structured protocol. Pain scores, analgesic requirements, and patient/parent feedback were recorded and analysed. The retrospective analysis concluded that effective pain control was achieved with oral analgesia within six hours postoperatively. In the prospective cohort, mean pain scores were 2.2/10 for the oral site and 2.5/10 for the hip donor site, managed with oral paracetamol and ibuprofen, with minimal opioid use (&lt;30%). No significant complications were reported. Transitioning to day-case ABG reduced bed shortage-related cancellations and was preferred by patients. Day-case ABG is a feasible and safe alternative to inpatient care when strict selection criteria and structured protocols are implemented. This approach optimises resource utilisation, minimises cancellations, and enhances patient satisfaction. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings and facilitate broader implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"63 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 385-392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435625001032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435625001032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙槽骨移植(ABG)是治疗牙槽裂和腭缺损的重要方法,可以促进上颌的连续性、牙萌出、功能康复和面部对称发育。由于疼痛管理方面的考虑,传统上作为住院手术进行,最近的努力已经探索了其作为日常手术的可行性。进行了两阶段的研究。首先,回顾性分析12例ABG病例(2023年7月- 2024年2月),评估术后疼痛管理和可行性。随后是一项前瞻性试点研究,涉及17例患者(2024年3月至8月),他们在结构化方案下接受了日间病例的ABG。记录并分析疼痛评分、镇痛需求和患者/家长反馈。回顾性分析得出结论,术后6小时内口服镇痛可有效控制疼痛。在前瞻性队列中,口腔部位的平均疼痛评分为2.2/10,髋关节供体部位的平均疼痛评分为2.5/10,口服扑热息痛和布洛芬,少量使用阿片类药物(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Day-case alveolar bone grafting in cleft patients: a two-part retrospective and prospective feasibility study
Alveolar bone grafting (ABG) is an essential procedure for the treatment of cleft alveolus and palate defects, promoting maxillary continuity, dental eruption, functional rehabilitation, and symmetrical facial development. Traditionally performed as an inpatient procedure due to pain management concerns, recent efforts have explored its feasibility as day-case surgery. A two-phase study was conducted. First, a retrospective analysis of 12 ABG cases (July 2023–February 2024) evaluated postoperative pain management and feasibility. This was followed by a prospective pilot study involving 17 patients (March–August 2024), who underwent ABG as day cases under a structured protocol. Pain scores, analgesic requirements, and patient/parent feedback were recorded and analysed. The retrospective analysis concluded that effective pain control was achieved with oral analgesia within six hours postoperatively. In the prospective cohort, mean pain scores were 2.2/10 for the oral site and 2.5/10 for the hip donor site, managed with oral paracetamol and ibuprofen, with minimal opioid use (<30%). No significant complications were reported. Transitioning to day-case ABG reduced bed shortage-related cancellations and was preferred by patients. Day-case ABG is a feasible and safe alternative to inpatient care when strict selection criteria and structured protocols are implemented. This approach optimises resource utilisation, minimises cancellations, and enhances patient satisfaction. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings and facilitate broader implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: • Leading articles on all aspects of surgery in the oro-facial and head and neck region • One of the largest circulations of any international journal in this field • Dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信