考虑ratemd潜在的意外后果:一个专业的探索性研究。

Kristina H Pulkki, Shamira Pira, Meredith Young, Grace M Scott, Carol Nhan, Kevin Fung, Gabriella Le Blanc, Lily Hp Nguyen
{"title":"考虑ratemd潜在的意外后果:一个专业的探索性研究。","authors":"Kristina H Pulkki, Shamira Pira, Meredith Young, Grace M Scott, Carol Nhan, Kevin Fung, Gabriella Le Blanc, Lily Hp Nguyen","doi":"10.36834/cmej.77821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Websites that facilitate communication between patients regarding their experiences with individual physicians are now relatively commonplace. Given patient-generated ratings are publicly available, physicians could use these to access rarely available patient feedback. We explored the content of reviews associated with low physician ratings and consider the potential benefits and consequences of relying on this form of freely available data to support individual life-long learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an exploratory qualitative descriptive study. We collected narrative comments associated with low numerical ratings on one physician-rating website (RateMDs) drawn from one specialty in Canada. Written reviews associated with low numerical ratings (≤2/5) for Canadian otolaryngologists were collected yielding a total of 878 comment sets that were analyzed deductively and iteratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that patient comments described poor performance in areas that aligned, for the most part, with the CanMEDS roles including Professional, Communicator, and Leader; specifically referring to management of the clinical environment, administrative staff, and trainees.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While not intended for physician feedback, physicians could access patient-to-patient ratings and associated written reviews as a means to identify areas of practice improvement. However, this represents an unintended use of these websites. While speculative, access to patient-to-patient rating websites could negatively impact physician confidence or self-worth - representing a negative consequence of their use. The utilization of these data for potential self-improvement represents an unintended use of patient-to-patient ratings and so may be accompanied by unintended consequences for physicians who use these data as potential feedback, and patients who contribute to physician rating sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":"16 2","pages":"17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considering the potential unintended consequences of RateMDs: an exploratory study in one specialty.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina H Pulkki, Shamira Pira, Meredith Young, Grace M Scott, Carol Nhan, Kevin Fung, Gabriella Le Blanc, Lily Hp Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.36834/cmej.77821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Websites that facilitate communication between patients regarding their experiences with individual physicians are now relatively commonplace. Given patient-generated ratings are publicly available, physicians could use these to access rarely available patient feedback. We explored the content of reviews associated with low physician ratings and consider the potential benefits and consequences of relying on this form of freely available data to support individual life-long learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an exploratory qualitative descriptive study. We collected narrative comments associated with low numerical ratings on one physician-rating website (RateMDs) drawn from one specialty in Canada. Written reviews associated with low numerical ratings (≤2/5) for Canadian otolaryngologists were collected yielding a total of 878 comment sets that were analyzed deductively and iteratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that patient comments described poor performance in areas that aligned, for the most part, with the CanMEDS roles including Professional, Communicator, and Leader; specifically referring to management of the clinical environment, administrative staff, and trainees.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While not intended for physician feedback, physicians could access patient-to-patient ratings and associated written reviews as a means to identify areas of practice improvement. However, this represents an unintended use of these websites. While speculative, access to patient-to-patient rating websites could negatively impact physician confidence or self-worth - representing a negative consequence of their use. The utilization of these data for potential self-improvement represents an unintended use of patient-to-patient ratings and so may be accompanied by unintended consequences for physicians who use these data as potential feedback, and patients who contribute to physician rating sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian medical education journal\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"17-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068199/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian medical education journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77821\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:促进患者之间交流他们与个别医生的经验的网站现在相对普遍。鉴于病人的评分是公开的,医生可以利用这些来获取很少得到的病人反馈。我们探讨了与低医师评分相关的评论内容,并考虑了依赖这种形式的免费数据来支持个人终身学习的潜在益处和后果。方法:进行探索性定性描述性研究。我们收集了一个来自加拿大某一专业的医生评分网站(RateMDs)上与低数值评分相关的叙述性评论。收集了加拿大耳鼻喉科医生的低数值评分(≤2/5)相关的书面评论,共产生878个评论集,并对其进行演绎和迭代分析。结果:我们发现,在大多数情况下,患者的评论描述了与CanMEDS角色一致的领域的不良表现,包括专业人士、沟通者和领导者;具体指临床环境管理、行政人员管理和学员管理。结论:虽然不是为了医生的反馈,但医生可以访问患者对患者的评分和相关的书面评论,作为确定实践改进领域的一种手段。然而,这代表了对这些网站的意外使用。虽然是推测性的,但访问患者对患者评级网站可能会对医生的信心或自我价值产生负面影响,这代表了使用这些网站的负面后果。利用这些数据进行潜在的自我提升代表了对患者对患者评分的意外使用,因此可能会给使用这些数据作为潜在反馈的医生和为医生评分网站做出贡献的患者带来意想不到的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considering the potential unintended consequences of RateMDs: an exploratory study in one specialty.

Background: Websites that facilitate communication between patients regarding their experiences with individual physicians are now relatively commonplace. Given patient-generated ratings are publicly available, physicians could use these to access rarely available patient feedback. We explored the content of reviews associated with low physician ratings and consider the potential benefits and consequences of relying on this form of freely available data to support individual life-long learning.

Methods: We conducted an exploratory qualitative descriptive study. We collected narrative comments associated with low numerical ratings on one physician-rating website (RateMDs) drawn from one specialty in Canada. Written reviews associated with low numerical ratings (≤2/5) for Canadian otolaryngologists were collected yielding a total of 878 comment sets that were analyzed deductively and iteratively.

Results: We found that patient comments described poor performance in areas that aligned, for the most part, with the CanMEDS roles including Professional, Communicator, and Leader; specifically referring to management of the clinical environment, administrative staff, and trainees.

Conclusion: While not intended for physician feedback, physicians could access patient-to-patient ratings and associated written reviews as a means to identify areas of practice improvement. However, this represents an unintended use of these websites. While speculative, access to patient-to-patient rating websites could negatively impact physician confidence or self-worth - representing a negative consequence of their use. The utilization of these data for potential self-improvement represents an unintended use of patient-to-patient ratings and so may be accompanied by unintended consequences for physicians who use these data as potential feedback, and patients who contribute to physician rating sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信