评估与面向哮喘患者的移动健康干预相关的成本节约。

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1055/a-2595-3329
Julia Nadelmann, Milin Patel, Sarah Lane, James Hammock, Allison Stark, Sunit P Jariwala
{"title":"评估与面向哮喘患者的移动健康干预相关的成本节约。","authors":"Julia Nadelmann, Milin Patel, Sarah Lane, James Hammock, Allison Stark, Sunit P Jariwala","doi":"10.1055/a-2595-3329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The patient-facing ASTHMAXcel mobile platform has been linked to improved asthma knowledge decreased asthma-related health care utilization (emergency department [ED] visits, hospitalizations), and reduced prednisone use among adult and pediatric patient populations.Given the upfront costs associated with developing mobile health platforms, this paper seeks to estimate the savings attributable to pediatric and adult users of the ASTHMAXcel platform through decreased hospitalizations, ED visits, and prednisone use.Forty adult patients and 39 pediatric patients with asthma completed studies evaluating the effectiveness of the ASTHMAXcel mobile platform at Montefiore Medical Center. Study participants received the mobile intervention for 6 months and questionnaires were administered at baseline and follow-up visits. Using internal cost data from Montefiore and information on insurance coverage, we estimated the average costs saved by the decreases in ED visits, hospitalizations, and prednisone usage throughout the study time period.Throughout the study time period, participant exposure to ASTHMAXcel and ASTHMAXcel adventures was estimated to save a total of $367,280 with $270,732 in savings from adults' decreased asthma-related health care utilization and $96,548 from pediatric decreases in asthma-related health care utilization. The bulk of these savings estimates are driven by decreases in hospitalizations among both pediatric and adult participants during the study time frame.Given the significant economic burden of asthma treatment and management and its disproportionate impact on those who are economically disadvantaged, it is critical that asthma interventions are assessed not only for their clinical effectiveness but also for their cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"1086-1094"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12431811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Cost Savings Associated with a Patient-Facing Asthma Mobile Health Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Nadelmann, Milin Patel, Sarah Lane, James Hammock, Allison Stark, Sunit P Jariwala\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2595-3329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The patient-facing ASTHMAXcel mobile platform has been linked to improved asthma knowledge decreased asthma-related health care utilization (emergency department [ED] visits, hospitalizations), and reduced prednisone use among adult and pediatric patient populations.Given the upfront costs associated with developing mobile health platforms, this paper seeks to estimate the savings attributable to pediatric and adult users of the ASTHMAXcel platform through decreased hospitalizations, ED visits, and prednisone use.Forty adult patients and 39 pediatric patients with asthma completed studies evaluating the effectiveness of the ASTHMAXcel mobile platform at Montefiore Medical Center. Study participants received the mobile intervention for 6 months and questionnaires were administered at baseline and follow-up visits. Using internal cost data from Montefiore and information on insurance coverage, we estimated the average costs saved by the decreases in ED visits, hospitalizations, and prednisone usage throughout the study time period.Throughout the study time period, participant exposure to ASTHMAXcel and ASTHMAXcel adventures was estimated to save a total of $367,280 with $270,732 in savings from adults' decreased asthma-related health care utilization and $96,548 from pediatric decreases in asthma-related health care utilization. The bulk of these savings estimates are driven by decreases in hospitalizations among both pediatric and adult participants during the study time frame.Given the significant economic burden of asthma treatment and management and its disproportionate impact on those who are economically disadvantaged, it is critical that asthma interventions are assessed not only for their clinical effectiveness but also for their cost-effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1086-1094\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12431811/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2595-3329\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2595-3329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:面向患者的ASTHMAXcel移动平台与改善哮喘知识、减少哮喘相关医疗保健利用(急诊科(ED)就诊、住院)以及减少成人和儿科患者人群中强的松的使用有关。目的:考虑到与开发移动医疗平台相关的前期成本,本文试图通过减少住院、ED就诊和强的松使用来估计儿童和成人用户使用ASTHMAXcel平台所节省的费用。方法:40名成人哮喘患者和39名儿科哮喘患者在Montefiore医疗中心完成了评估ASTHMAXcel移动平台有效性的研究。研究参与者接受了为期6个月的移动干预,并在基线和随访时进行问卷调查。利用Montefiore的内部成本数据和保险覆盖的信息,我们估计了在整个研究期间因急诊科就诊、住院和强的松使用减少而节省的平均成本。结果:在整个研究期间,参与者接触ASTHMAXcel和ASTHMAXcel冒险活动估计节省了总共367,280美元,其中成人减少哮喘相关医疗保健利用节省了270,732美元,儿童减少了哮喘相关医疗保健利用节省了96,548美元。这些节省估计的大部分是由于在研究期间儿童和成人参与者住院治疗的减少。结论:鉴于哮喘治疗和管理的巨大经济负担及其对经济弱势群体的不成比例的影响,评估哮喘干预措施不仅要评估其临床效果,还要评估其成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Cost Savings Associated with a Patient-Facing Asthma Mobile Health Intervention.

The patient-facing ASTHMAXcel mobile platform has been linked to improved asthma knowledge decreased asthma-related health care utilization (emergency department [ED] visits, hospitalizations), and reduced prednisone use among adult and pediatric patient populations.Given the upfront costs associated with developing mobile health platforms, this paper seeks to estimate the savings attributable to pediatric and adult users of the ASTHMAXcel platform through decreased hospitalizations, ED visits, and prednisone use.Forty adult patients and 39 pediatric patients with asthma completed studies evaluating the effectiveness of the ASTHMAXcel mobile platform at Montefiore Medical Center. Study participants received the mobile intervention for 6 months and questionnaires were administered at baseline and follow-up visits. Using internal cost data from Montefiore and information on insurance coverage, we estimated the average costs saved by the decreases in ED visits, hospitalizations, and prednisone usage throughout the study time period.Throughout the study time period, participant exposure to ASTHMAXcel and ASTHMAXcel adventures was estimated to save a total of $367,280 with $270,732 in savings from adults' decreased asthma-related health care utilization and $96,548 from pediatric decreases in asthma-related health care utilization. The bulk of these savings estimates are driven by decreases in hospitalizations among both pediatric and adult participants during the study time frame.Given the significant economic burden of asthma treatment and management and its disproportionate impact on those who are economically disadvantaged, it is critical that asthma interventions are assessed not only for their clinical effectiveness but also for their cost-effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信