关于CDS失败的特刊:重新设计预警失败后早产儿视网膜病变筛查的临床决策支持。

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1055/a-2594-3571
Mikael C Guzman-Karlsson, Lauren M Hess, Amy L Jeppesen, Regine M Fortunov
{"title":"关于CDS失败的特刊:重新设计预警失败后早产儿视网膜病变筛查的临床决策支持。","authors":"Mikael C Guzman-Karlsson, Lauren M Hess, Amy L Jeppesen, Regine M Fortunov","doi":"10.1055/a-2594-3571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the leading cause of preventable childhood blindness. Guidelines recommend screening for infants with gestational age at birth <31 weeks or birth weight ≤1,500 g. However, ensuring timely screening during readmissions after birth is challenging.To analyze the performance of an interruptive alert at a large academic pediatric hospital for identifying premature infants needing ROP screening upon hospital readmission and to describe how data informed the transition to a non-interruptive dashboard.The alert appeared for patients 1 to 365 days of age hospitalized in acute care or pediatric intensive care and instructed providers to order an ophthalmology consult from within the alert and to call ophthalmology for at-risk patients. For quality improvement, the clinical decision support (CDS) advisory group evaluated the effectiveness and efficiency of the alert. We extracted alert metrics from the hospital's enterprise data warehouse, including the user response and feedback, patient characteristics (age, birth gestational age, and birth weight), and any ophthalmology consultations. We analyzed the percentage of encounters seen by ophthalmology using a statistical process control chart during alert implementation and 6 months before and after.The alert appeared 3,309 times during 2,194 patient encounters usually. Users chose \"Accept and place order\" for 43% (943/2,194) of encounters, but only 11% (102/943) had an ophthalmology consult; 34% (53/155) of ophthalmology consultations occurred in encounters with a final response other than \"Accept and place order.\" The intervention was redesigned using a non-interruptive surveillance dashboard with greater specificity, and the alert was de-implemented.Analysis of a failed interruptive alert for identifying patients at risk for ROP led to a transition to targeted surveillance using a dashboard. This case emphasizes the importance of aligning the CDS modality to the clinical workflow, information availability, and user decision-making needs and should be supported by governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"1024-1030"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redesigning Clinical Decision Support for Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening After Alert Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Mikael C Guzman-Karlsson, Lauren M Hess, Amy L Jeppesen, Regine M Fortunov\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2594-3571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the leading cause of preventable childhood blindness. Guidelines recommend screening for infants with gestational age at birth <31 weeks or birth weight ≤1,500 g. However, ensuring timely screening during readmissions after birth is challenging.To analyze the performance of an interruptive alert at a large academic pediatric hospital for identifying premature infants needing ROP screening upon hospital readmission and to describe how data informed the transition to a non-interruptive dashboard.The alert appeared for patients 1 to 365 days of age hospitalized in acute care or pediatric intensive care and instructed providers to order an ophthalmology consult from within the alert and to call ophthalmology for at-risk patients. For quality improvement, the clinical decision support (CDS) advisory group evaluated the effectiveness and efficiency of the alert. We extracted alert metrics from the hospital's enterprise data warehouse, including the user response and feedback, patient characteristics (age, birth gestational age, and birth weight), and any ophthalmology consultations. We analyzed the percentage of encounters seen by ophthalmology using a statistical process control chart during alert implementation and 6 months before and after.The alert appeared 3,309 times during 2,194 patient encounters usually. Users chose \\\"Accept and place order\\\" for 43% (943/2,194) of encounters, but only 11% (102/943) had an ophthalmology consult; 34% (53/155) of ophthalmology consultations occurred in encounters with a final response other than \\\"Accept and place order.\\\" The intervention was redesigned using a non-interruptive surveillance dashboard with greater specificity, and the alert was de-implemented.Analysis of a failed interruptive alert for identifying patients at risk for ROP led to a transition to targeted surveillance using a dashboard. This case emphasizes the importance of aligning the CDS modality to the clinical workflow, information availability, and user decision-making needs and should be supported by governance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1024-1030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413272/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2594-3571\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2594-3571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)是可预防的儿童失明的主要原因。指南建议对出生时胎龄< 31周或出生体重≤1500g的婴儿进行筛查。然而,确保在出生后再入院时及时筛查是具有挑战性的。目的:分析一家大型学术儿科医院的中断警报的性能,以识别再次入院时需要进行ROP筛查的早产儿,并描述数据如何告知向非中断仪表板的过渡。方法:警报出现在1-365天的急性护理或儿科重症监护住院患者中,并指示提供者在警报范围内安排眼科会诊,并呼叫有风险患者的眼科。为了提高质量,临床决策支持(CDS)咨询小组评估了警报的有效性和效率。我们从医院的企业数据仓库中获取警报指标,包括用户响应和反馈、患者特征(年龄、出生胎龄和出生体重)以及任何眼科咨询。我们使用统计过程控制图分析了在警报实施期间和前后6个月眼科就诊的百分比。结果:在2194例患者就诊中,预警出现3309次。43%(943/2194)的用户选择“接受并下单”,但只有11%(102/943)的用户进行了眼科咨询;34%(53/155)的眼科会诊发生在最后答复不是“接受并下单”的情况下。重新设计了干预措施,使用了具有更高特异性的非间断监视仪表板,并取消了警报。结论:对识别有ROP风险患者的中断警报失败的分析导致使用仪表板进行有针对性的监测。这个案例强调了使CDS模式与临床工作流程、信息可用性和用户决策需求保持一致的重要性,并应得到治理的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redesigning Clinical Decision Support for Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening After Alert Failure.

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the leading cause of preventable childhood blindness. Guidelines recommend screening for infants with gestational age at birth <31 weeks or birth weight ≤1,500 g. However, ensuring timely screening during readmissions after birth is challenging.To analyze the performance of an interruptive alert at a large academic pediatric hospital for identifying premature infants needing ROP screening upon hospital readmission and to describe how data informed the transition to a non-interruptive dashboard.The alert appeared for patients 1 to 365 days of age hospitalized in acute care or pediatric intensive care and instructed providers to order an ophthalmology consult from within the alert and to call ophthalmology for at-risk patients. For quality improvement, the clinical decision support (CDS) advisory group evaluated the effectiveness and efficiency of the alert. We extracted alert metrics from the hospital's enterprise data warehouse, including the user response and feedback, patient characteristics (age, birth gestational age, and birth weight), and any ophthalmology consultations. We analyzed the percentage of encounters seen by ophthalmology using a statistical process control chart during alert implementation and 6 months before and after.The alert appeared 3,309 times during 2,194 patient encounters usually. Users chose "Accept and place order" for 43% (943/2,194) of encounters, but only 11% (102/943) had an ophthalmology consult; 34% (53/155) of ophthalmology consultations occurred in encounters with a final response other than "Accept and place order." The intervention was redesigned using a non-interruptive surveillance dashboard with greater specificity, and the alert was de-implemented.Analysis of a failed interruptive alert for identifying patients at risk for ROP led to a transition to targeted surveillance using a dashboard. This case emphasizes the importance of aligning the CDS modality to the clinical workflow, information availability, and user decision-making needs and should be supported by governance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信