利用健康信息交换的临床决策支持提高了与患者复苏命令和临终愿望的一致性。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Eesha Chakravartty, Jared Silberlust, Saul Blecker, Yunan Zhao, Fariza Alendy, Heather Menzer, Aamina Ahmed, Simon Jones, Meg Ferrauiola, Jonathan Saul Austrian
{"title":"利用健康信息交换的临床决策支持提高了与患者复苏命令和临终愿望的一致性。","authors":"Eesha Chakravartty, Jared Silberlust, Saul Blecker, Yunan Zhao, Fariza Alendy, Heather Menzer, Aamina Ahmed, Simon Jones, Meg Ferrauiola, Jonathan Saul Austrian","doi":"10.1055/a-2591-9040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives Improve concordance between patient end-of-life preferences and code status orders by incorporating data from a state registry with Clinical Decision Support (CDS) within the electronic health record (EHR) to preserve patient autonomy and ensure that patients receive care that aligns with their wishes. Methods Leveraging a Health Information exchange (HIE) interface between the New York State Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (eMOLST) registry and the EHR of our academic health system, we developed a bundled CDS intervention that displays eMOLST information at the time of code status ordering and provides an in-line alert when providers enter a resuscitation order discordant with wishes documented in the eMOLST registry. To evaluate this intervention, we performed a segmented regression analysis of an interrupted times series to compare percentage of discordant orders before and after implementation among all hospitalizations for which an eMOLST was available. Results We identified a total of 3648 visits that had an eMOLST filed prior to inpatient admission and a code status order placed during admission. There was a statistically significant decrease of discordant resuscitation orders of -5.95% after the intervention went live, with a relative risk reduction of 25%, [95% CI: -9.95%, -1.94%, p=0.009] in the pre- and post-intervention period. Logistic regression model after adjusting for co-variates showed an average marginal effect of -5.12% after the intervention [CI =-9.75%, -0.50%, p=0.03]. Conclusions Our intervention resulted in a decrease in discordant resuscitation orders. This study demonstrates that accessibility to eMOLST data within the provider workflow supported by CDS can reduce discrepancies between patient end-of-life wishes and hospital code status orders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Decision Support Leveraging Health Information Exchange improves Concordance with Patient's Resuscitation Orders and End-Of-Life Wishes.\",\"authors\":\"Eesha Chakravartty, Jared Silberlust, Saul Blecker, Yunan Zhao, Fariza Alendy, Heather Menzer, Aamina Ahmed, Simon Jones, Meg Ferrauiola, Jonathan Saul Austrian\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2591-9040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives Improve concordance between patient end-of-life preferences and code status orders by incorporating data from a state registry with Clinical Decision Support (CDS) within the electronic health record (EHR) to preserve patient autonomy and ensure that patients receive care that aligns with their wishes. Methods Leveraging a Health Information exchange (HIE) interface between the New York State Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (eMOLST) registry and the EHR of our academic health system, we developed a bundled CDS intervention that displays eMOLST information at the time of code status ordering and provides an in-line alert when providers enter a resuscitation order discordant with wishes documented in the eMOLST registry. To evaluate this intervention, we performed a segmented regression analysis of an interrupted times series to compare percentage of discordant orders before and after implementation among all hospitalizations for which an eMOLST was available. Results We identified a total of 3648 visits that had an eMOLST filed prior to inpatient admission and a code status order placed during admission. There was a statistically significant decrease of discordant resuscitation orders of -5.95% after the intervention went live, with a relative risk reduction of 25%, [95% CI: -9.95%, -1.94%, p=0.009] in the pre- and post-intervention period. Logistic regression model after adjusting for co-variates showed an average marginal effect of -5.12% after the intervention [CI =-9.75%, -0.50%, p=0.03]. Conclusions Our intervention resulted in a decrease in discordant resuscitation orders. This study demonstrates that accessibility to eMOLST data within the provider workflow supported by CDS can reduce discrepancies between patient end-of-life wishes and hospital code status orders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2591-9040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2591-9040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:通过在电子健康记录(EHR)中纳入具有临床决策支持(CDS)的州登记处的数据,改善患者临终偏好和代码状态命令之间的一致性,以保持患者的自主权,并确保患者接受符合其意愿的护理。方法利用纽约州维持生命治疗医嘱(eMOLST)登记系统和学术卫生系统EHR之间的健康信息交换(HIE)接口,我们开发了一种捆绑的CDS干预措施,在代码状态订购时显示eMOLST信息,并在提供者输入与eMOLST登记中记录的愿望不一致的复苏医嘱时提供在线警报。为了评估该干预措施,我们对中断时间序列进行了分段回归分析,以比较在所有可获得eMOLST的住院治疗中实施前后不一致订单的百分比。结果:我们共确定了3648次就诊,在住院前有eMOLST存档,并在住院期间放置了代码状态订单。干预前后,不一致复苏指令的发生率降低了-5.95%,相对风险降低了25%,[95% CI: -9.95%, -1.94%, p=0.009]。经协变量调整后的Logistic回归模型显示,干预后平均边际效应为-5.12% [CI =-9.75%, -0.50%, p=0.03]。结论我们的干预减少了不一致的复苏顺序。本研究表明,在CDS支持的提供者工作流程中访问eMOLST数据可以减少患者临终愿望与医院代码状态命令之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Decision Support Leveraging Health Information Exchange improves Concordance with Patient's Resuscitation Orders and End-Of-Life Wishes.

Objectives Improve concordance between patient end-of-life preferences and code status orders by incorporating data from a state registry with Clinical Decision Support (CDS) within the electronic health record (EHR) to preserve patient autonomy and ensure that patients receive care that aligns with their wishes. Methods Leveraging a Health Information exchange (HIE) interface between the New York State Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (eMOLST) registry and the EHR of our academic health system, we developed a bundled CDS intervention that displays eMOLST information at the time of code status ordering and provides an in-line alert when providers enter a resuscitation order discordant with wishes documented in the eMOLST registry. To evaluate this intervention, we performed a segmented regression analysis of an interrupted times series to compare percentage of discordant orders before and after implementation among all hospitalizations for which an eMOLST was available. Results We identified a total of 3648 visits that had an eMOLST filed prior to inpatient admission and a code status order placed during admission. There was a statistically significant decrease of discordant resuscitation orders of -5.95% after the intervention went live, with a relative risk reduction of 25%, [95% CI: -9.95%, -1.94%, p=0.009] in the pre- and post-intervention period. Logistic regression model after adjusting for co-variates showed an average marginal effect of -5.12% after the intervention [CI =-9.75%, -0.50%, p=0.03]. Conclusions Our intervention resulted in a decrease in discordant resuscitation orders. This study demonstrates that accessibility to eMOLST data within the provider workflow supported by CDS can reduce discrepancies between patient end-of-life wishes and hospital code status orders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信