抬高头部的位置对视频喉镜插管过程中颈椎运动的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Woo-Young Jo, Chan-Ho Hong, Kyung Won Shin, Hyongmin Oh, Hee-Pyoung Park
{"title":"抬高头部的位置对视频喉镜插管过程中颈椎运动的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Woo-Young Jo, Chan-Ho Hong, Kyung Won Shin, Hyongmin Oh, Hee-Pyoung Park","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02946-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The head-elevated position during videolaryngoscopic intubation enables better visualization of the glottis than the head-flat position. We hypothesized that the head-elevated position would result in less cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which we assigned patients undergoing coil embolization for unruptured cerebral aneurysms into the head-elevated (N = 55) or head-flat (N = 54) groups. Manual in-line stabilization was applied to simulate cervical spine immobilization during Macintosh-type videolaryngoscopic intubation. To measure the cervical spine angle, two lateral cervical spine radiographs using the capture method were taken, one before and one during intubation, respectively. The primary outcome was cervical spine motion during intubation (cervical spine angle during intubation - cervical spine angle before intubation) at the occiput-C1 segment. We investigated cervical spine motion at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments; intubation performance, such as the success rate at the first attempt, intubation time, and frequency of external laryngeal maneuver; and intubation-associated airway complications (airway bleeding, injury, sore throat, and hoarseness).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significantly less cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1 segment in the head-elevated group than the head-flat group (mean [standard deviation], 8.6° [5.6°] vs 11.4° [5.7°]; mean difference [95% confidence interval], -2.9° [-5.0 to -0.7]; P = 0.009). Cervical spine motion at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments, intubation performance, and intubation-associated airway complications did not significantly differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The head-elevated position during Macintosh-type videolaryngoscopic intubation with manual in-line stabilization resulted in less upper cervical spine motion than the head-flat position.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>CRIS.nih.go.kr ( KCT0008669 ); date of registration (approved), 1 August 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the head-elevated position on cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation with manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Woo-Young Jo, Chan-Ho Hong, Kyung Won Shin, Hyongmin Oh, Hee-Pyoung Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12630-025-02946-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The head-elevated position during videolaryngoscopic intubation enables better visualization of the glottis than the head-flat position. We hypothesized that the head-elevated position would result in less cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which we assigned patients undergoing coil embolization for unruptured cerebral aneurysms into the head-elevated (N = 55) or head-flat (N = 54) groups. Manual in-line stabilization was applied to simulate cervical spine immobilization during Macintosh-type videolaryngoscopic intubation. To measure the cervical spine angle, two lateral cervical spine radiographs using the capture method were taken, one before and one during intubation, respectively. The primary outcome was cervical spine motion during intubation (cervical spine angle during intubation - cervical spine angle before intubation) at the occiput-C1 segment. We investigated cervical spine motion at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments; intubation performance, such as the success rate at the first attempt, intubation time, and frequency of external laryngeal maneuver; and intubation-associated airway complications (airway bleeding, injury, sore throat, and hoarseness).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significantly less cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1 segment in the head-elevated group than the head-flat group (mean [standard deviation], 8.6° [5.6°] vs 11.4° [5.7°]; mean difference [95% confidence interval], -2.9° [-5.0 to -0.7]; P = 0.009). Cervical spine motion at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments, intubation performance, and intubation-associated airway complications did not significantly differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The head-elevated position during Macintosh-type videolaryngoscopic intubation with manual in-line stabilization resulted in less upper cervical spine motion than the head-flat position.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>CRIS.nih.go.kr ( KCT0008669 ); date of registration (approved), 1 August 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02946-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02946-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在视频喉镜插管时,头部抬高的位置比头部平放的位置能更好地观察声门。我们假设,在手动在线稳定的情况下,头部抬高的位置会导致视频喉镜插管时颈椎运动减少。方法:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,我们将接受线圈栓塞治疗未破裂脑动脉瘤的患者分为抬头组(N = 55)和平头组(N = 54)。在麦金塔式视频喉镜插管期间,应用手动在线稳定模拟颈椎固定。为测量颈椎角度,分别在插管前和插管时拍摄2张颈椎侧位片。主要结局是插管时枕骨- c1节段的颈椎运动(插管时颈椎角度-插管前颈椎角度)。我们研究了C1-C2和C2-C5节段的颈椎运动;插管表现,如第一次插管成功率、插管时间、喉外操作次数等;以及插管相关的气道并发症(气道出血、损伤、喉咙痛和声音嘶哑)。结果:头抬高组枕骨- c1节段颈椎运动明显少于头平躺组(平均[标准差],8.6°[5.6°]vs 11.4°[5.7°];平均差[95%置信区间],-2.9°[-5.0至-0.7];p = 0.009)。两组间C1-C2和C2-C5节段颈椎运动、插管表现和插管相关气道并发症无显著差异。结论:在麦金塔式视频喉镜插管时,手动直线稳定的头部抬高位比平头位导致的上颈椎运动更少。研究注册:criss .nih.go.kr (KCT0008669);注册(批准)日期,2023年8月1日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of the head-elevated position on cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation with manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: The head-elevated position during videolaryngoscopic intubation enables better visualization of the glottis than the head-flat position. We hypothesized that the head-elevated position would result in less cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which we assigned patients undergoing coil embolization for unruptured cerebral aneurysms into the head-elevated (N = 55) or head-flat (N = 54) groups. Manual in-line stabilization was applied to simulate cervical spine immobilization during Macintosh-type videolaryngoscopic intubation. To measure the cervical spine angle, two lateral cervical spine radiographs using the capture method were taken, one before and one during intubation, respectively. The primary outcome was cervical spine motion during intubation (cervical spine angle during intubation - cervical spine angle before intubation) at the occiput-C1 segment. We investigated cervical spine motion at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments; intubation performance, such as the success rate at the first attempt, intubation time, and frequency of external laryngeal maneuver; and intubation-associated airway complications (airway bleeding, injury, sore throat, and hoarseness).

Results: There was significantly less cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1 segment in the head-elevated group than the head-flat group (mean [standard deviation], 8.6° [5.6°] vs 11.4° [5.7°]; mean difference [95% confidence interval], -2.9° [-5.0 to -0.7]; P = 0.009). Cervical spine motion at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments, intubation performance, and intubation-associated airway complications did not significantly differ between the groups.

Conclusions: The head-elevated position during Macintosh-type videolaryngoscopic intubation with manual in-line stabilization resulted in less upper cervical spine motion than the head-flat position.

Study registration: CRIS.nih.go.kr ( KCT0008669 ); date of registration (approved), 1 August 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信