包容性参与促进公平韧性:社区案例研究见解。

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Emily Eisenhauer, Keely Maxwell, Brittany Kiessling, Siena Henson, Marissa Matsler, Raven Nee, Maureen Shacklette, Meridith Fry, Susan Julius
{"title":"包容性参与促进公平韧性:社区案例研究见解。","authors":"Emily Eisenhauer, Keely Maxwell, Brittany Kiessling, Siena Henson, Marissa Matsler, Raven Nee, Maureen Shacklette, Meridith Fry, Susan Julius","doi":"10.1088/2515-7620/ad9242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Incorporating equity into climate resilience planning, especially through participatory processes, is important to adequately address social vulnerability and avoid reproducing inequities. Recent analyses of resilience and adaptation plans in the United States suggest that there is increasing attention on equity and justice, but a wide variation in how it is being incorporated and implemented. Available studies of resilience planning are limited by their focus on larger urban areas and on plan contents. This research contributes a qualitative analysis of participatory engagement for resilience planning in smaller cities and rural areas. It presents findings from community case studies used as part of human-centered design research to develop an equitable resilience planning tool. Materials from the tool were used to conduct participatory engagement activities including storytelling, mapping, and brainstorming actions that elicited community members' experiences with hazards and disasters and ideas for equitable resilience actions. Themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis of the workshop discussions were: community members' include both environmental and social concerns in addressing resilience, challenges associated with social vulnerability framing, the underlying social systems that perpetuate inequities, recognizing different types of trauma, the power of convening, and challenges with sustaining engagement without dedicated resources. This article provides insights that inform efforts to better incorporate equity into resilience planning and advance the study of equitable resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":48496,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Communications","volume":"6 ","pages":"125012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusive engagement for equitable resilience: community case study insights.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Eisenhauer, Keely Maxwell, Brittany Kiessling, Siena Henson, Marissa Matsler, Raven Nee, Maureen Shacklette, Meridith Fry, Susan Julius\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2515-7620/ad9242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Incorporating equity into climate resilience planning, especially through participatory processes, is important to adequately address social vulnerability and avoid reproducing inequities. Recent analyses of resilience and adaptation plans in the United States suggest that there is increasing attention on equity and justice, but a wide variation in how it is being incorporated and implemented. Available studies of resilience planning are limited by their focus on larger urban areas and on plan contents. This research contributes a qualitative analysis of participatory engagement for resilience planning in smaller cities and rural areas. It presents findings from community case studies used as part of human-centered design research to develop an equitable resilience planning tool. Materials from the tool were used to conduct participatory engagement activities including storytelling, mapping, and brainstorming actions that elicited community members' experiences with hazards and disasters and ideas for equitable resilience actions. Themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis of the workshop discussions were: community members' include both environmental and social concerns in addressing resilience, challenges associated with social vulnerability framing, the underlying social systems that perpetuate inequities, recognizing different types of trauma, the power of convening, and challenges with sustaining engagement without dedicated resources. This article provides insights that inform efforts to better incorporate equity into resilience planning and advance the study of equitable resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Research Communications\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"125012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980913/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Research Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad9242\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad9242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将公平纳入气候适应能力规划,特别是通过参与性进程,对于充分解决社会脆弱性和避免不平等再现至关重要。最近对美国恢复力和适应计划的分析表明,人们越来越重视公平和正义,但在如何纳入和实施方面却存在很大差异。现有的弹性规划研究主要集中在较大的城市区域和规划内容上。本研究对小城市和农村地区韧性规划的参与性参与进行了定性分析。它介绍了社区案例研究的结果,这些研究被用作以人为本的设计研究的一部分,以开发公平的弹性规划工具。该工具的材料被用于开展参与性参与活动,包括讲故事、绘制地图和头脑风暴活动,这些活动激发了社区成员对灾害和灾害的经验以及公平的抗灾行动的想法。从研讨会讨论的定性分析中得出的主题是:社区成员在解决复原力方面的环境和社会问题,与社会脆弱性框架相关的挑战,使不平等长期存在的潜在社会制度,认识到不同类型的创伤,召集的力量,以及在没有专门资源的情况下维持参与的挑战。本文为更好地将公平纳入弹性规划和推进公平弹性研究提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inclusive engagement for equitable resilience: community case study insights.

Incorporating equity into climate resilience planning, especially through participatory processes, is important to adequately address social vulnerability and avoid reproducing inequities. Recent analyses of resilience and adaptation plans in the United States suggest that there is increasing attention on equity and justice, but a wide variation in how it is being incorporated and implemented. Available studies of resilience planning are limited by their focus on larger urban areas and on plan contents. This research contributes a qualitative analysis of participatory engagement for resilience planning in smaller cities and rural areas. It presents findings from community case studies used as part of human-centered design research to develop an equitable resilience planning tool. Materials from the tool were used to conduct participatory engagement activities including storytelling, mapping, and brainstorming actions that elicited community members' experiences with hazards and disasters and ideas for equitable resilience actions. Themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis of the workshop discussions were: community members' include both environmental and social concerns in addressing resilience, challenges associated with social vulnerability framing, the underlying social systems that perpetuate inequities, recognizing different types of trauma, the power of convening, and challenges with sustaining engagement without dedicated resources. This article provides insights that inform efforts to better incorporate equity into resilience planning and advance the study of equitable resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Research Communications
Environmental Research Communications ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
136
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信