脑卒中康复中复杂护理需求患者的管理探讨:一项解释性描述研究。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000440
Alyssa Indar, Michelle Nelson, Whitney Berta, Maria Mylopoulos
{"title":"脑卒中康复中复杂护理需求患者的管理探讨:一项解释性描述研究。","authors":"Alyssa Indar, Michelle Nelson, Whitney Berta, Maria Mylopoulos","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exploring the \"wicked\" problem of improving care for patients with complex care needs could benefit a large swath of health system stakeholders given the breadth and depth of this issue. Patients with complex health and social needs often require customized care that deviates from expected care trajectories. At Canadian Stroke Distinction sites, clinicians provide care for a high proportion of patients with complex needs while adhering to best practice recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an interpretive description study, which explored the perspectives of 16 stroke rehabilitation clinicians, four organizational key informants, and two health system key informants. We collected data via 45- to 60-minute virtual interviews and engaged in a hybrid inductive-deductive approach to analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We constructed three main themes: (a) recognizing complexity is routine work for clinicians, (b) clinicians use workarounds to manage complexity, and (c) clinicians perceived and worked to bridge a difference between organizational processes and the realities of patient care. When comparing clinician and key informant perspectives, we noted differences regarding their perceptions of the prevalence and nature of patient complexity. We developed the concept of \"work-as-expected\" as an intermediary to bridge the gap between the \"work-as-imagined\" and \"work-as-done\" framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We describe the strategies used by expert clinicians to continually manage care for a high proportion of patients with complex care needs. Although expert clinicians have developed effective workarounds, they experience significant moral distress when these strategies are unable to compensate for health system limitations.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>A better understanding of how clinicians manage the needs of patients with complex care needs could support policymakers and organizational leaders to consider macro- and meso-level strategies to support the adaptive practices of clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":" ","pages":"185-196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring perspectives on the management of patients with complex care needs in stroke rehabilitation: An interpretive description study.\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa Indar, Michelle Nelson, Whitney Berta, Maria Mylopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exploring the \\\"wicked\\\" problem of improving care for patients with complex care needs could benefit a large swath of health system stakeholders given the breadth and depth of this issue. Patients with complex health and social needs often require customized care that deviates from expected care trajectories. At Canadian Stroke Distinction sites, clinicians provide care for a high proportion of patients with complex needs while adhering to best practice recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an interpretive description study, which explored the perspectives of 16 stroke rehabilitation clinicians, four organizational key informants, and two health system key informants. We collected data via 45- to 60-minute virtual interviews and engaged in a hybrid inductive-deductive approach to analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We constructed three main themes: (a) recognizing complexity is routine work for clinicians, (b) clinicians use workarounds to manage complexity, and (c) clinicians perceived and worked to bridge a difference between organizational processes and the realities of patient care. When comparing clinician and key informant perspectives, we noted differences regarding their perceptions of the prevalence and nature of patient complexity. We developed the concept of \\\"work-as-expected\\\" as an intermediary to bridge the gap between the \\\"work-as-imagined\\\" and \\\"work-as-done\\\" framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We describe the strategies used by expert clinicians to continually manage care for a high proportion of patients with complex care needs. Although expert clinicians have developed effective workarounds, they experience significant moral distress when these strategies are unable to compensate for health system limitations.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>A better understanding of how clinicians manage the needs of patients with complex care needs could support policymakers and organizational leaders to consider macro- and meso-level strategies to support the adaptive practices of clinicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"185-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000440\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:考虑到这一问题的广度和深度,探索改善对具有复杂护理需求的患者的护理的“邪恶”问题可以使卫生系统的大量利益相关者受益。具有复杂健康和社会需求的患者往往需要偏离预期护理轨迹的定制护理。在加拿大中风区分网站,临床医生提供护理的病人有复杂的需要,同时坚持最佳实践建议的比例高。方法:对16名脑卒中康复临床医生、4名组织关键举报人和2名卫生系统关键举报人的观点进行了解释性描述研究。我们通过45至60分钟的虚拟访谈收集数据,并采用混合归纳-演绎方法进行分析。结果:我们构建了三个主要主题:(a)认识到复杂性是临床医生的日常工作,(b)临床医生使用解决方案来管理复杂性,以及(c)临床医生感知并努力弥合组织流程与患者护理现实之间的差异。当比较临床医生和关键信息提供者的观点时,我们注意到他们对患者复杂性的患病率和性质的看法存在差异。我们开发了“按预期工作”的概念,作为“按想象工作”和“按完成工作”框架之间的桥梁。结论:我们描述了专家临床医生使用的策略,以持续管理高比例的复杂护理需求患者的护理。尽管专家临床医生已经制定了有效的变通办法,但当这些策略无法弥补卫生系统的局限性时,他们会感到严重的道德困扰。实践意义:更好地了解临床医生如何管理具有复杂护理需求的患者的需求,可以支持政策制定者和组织领导者考虑宏观和中观层面的策略,以支持临床医生的适应性实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring perspectives on the management of patients with complex care needs in stroke rehabilitation: An interpretive description study.

Background: Exploring the "wicked" problem of improving care for patients with complex care needs could benefit a large swath of health system stakeholders given the breadth and depth of this issue. Patients with complex health and social needs often require customized care that deviates from expected care trajectories. At Canadian Stroke Distinction sites, clinicians provide care for a high proportion of patients with complex needs while adhering to best practice recommendations.

Methods: We conducted an interpretive description study, which explored the perspectives of 16 stroke rehabilitation clinicians, four organizational key informants, and two health system key informants. We collected data via 45- to 60-minute virtual interviews and engaged in a hybrid inductive-deductive approach to analysis.

Results: We constructed three main themes: (a) recognizing complexity is routine work for clinicians, (b) clinicians use workarounds to manage complexity, and (c) clinicians perceived and worked to bridge a difference between organizational processes and the realities of patient care. When comparing clinician and key informant perspectives, we noted differences regarding their perceptions of the prevalence and nature of patient complexity. We developed the concept of "work-as-expected" as an intermediary to bridge the gap between the "work-as-imagined" and "work-as-done" framework.

Conclusion: We describe the strategies used by expert clinicians to continually manage care for a high proportion of patients with complex care needs. Although expert clinicians have developed effective workarounds, they experience significant moral distress when these strategies are unable to compensate for health system limitations.

Practice implications: A better understanding of how clinicians manage the needs of patients with complex care needs could support policymakers and organizational leaders to consider macro- and meso-level strategies to support the adaptive practices of clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信